- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- The Inconvenience Committee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not seeing anything to suggest meaningful notability and improvement with the best search results here and here. With no obvious signs of improvement or moving elsewhere, I'm not seeing anything to suggest keeping and there have been no one significant edits since starting in February 2009. SwisterTwister talk 03:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No citations (the one on the page redirects away from the original target) and no evidence of notability. The Nom's Google searches represent more good faith work to justify this article than the article authors put in. -Markeer 23:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Non notable pressure group, fails WP:ORG. Apologies for the inconvenience. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.