- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Deleted at 19:27, October 23, 2007 by Violetriga. This afd discussion closed by B1atv 18:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC) (non admin closure)[reply]
- Todays television (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a soapbox. J-ſtanTalkContribs 17:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as a "duh". - Smashville 18:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I was thinking about tagging it, but I didn't know what it would fall under. J-ſtanTalkContribs 18:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't either...which is why I think there should just be a duh. Like if someone creates "Joey Jones is the King of the Universe and is teh awesome"...technically..."King of the Universe" is an assertion of notability... Smashville 18:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think anyone would mind in this case if an admin excersized the right to IAR. J-ſtanTalkContribs 18:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't either...which is why I think there should just be a duh. Like if someone creates "Joey Jones is the King of the Universe and is teh awesome"...technically..."King of the Universe" is an assertion of notability... Smashville 18:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I was thinking about tagging it, but I didn't know what it would fall under. J-ſtanTalkContribs 18:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete...yes but it's an unproven, unsourced claim, plus you can also say that article was little or no context too :) Wildthing61476 18:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - I tagged it as speedy using the "little or no context" - I'm not sure if that's a valid use of that reason; but there should be a snow or iar reason for articles such as this - You may joke about "king of the universe" asserting notability; but I've had csd nominations rejected on (what appeared to me to be) similar grounds ;-) B1atv 18:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.