- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Lamest discussions
- Wikipedia:Lamest discussions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Abandoned page with only one entry, which wasn't even really a discussion. Quite nearly orphaned, with the only link from an article being from WP:LAME. Nobody, including the page creator, seems to have any interest in maintaining it. KonveyorBelt 16:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- delete disapppointed that I'm not listed on the list, but that's another issue...--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Keep. Project related opinion. First consider merge and redirect to Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars, then userfy to the author's userspace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't really fit that target. Author doesn't want it. And per TPH below. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, potential for flaming if it ever gets expanded, and clearly WP:POINTy given the single entry on it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- delete I thought this was Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars at first and was about to say 'keep', but then I realised it's just a feeble me-too that's either abandoned, or else deliberately very pointy. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- delete — Any content here could probably be covered by WP:LAME? The author doesn't seem to object: see here. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 16:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete — There is one link, and it can probably be merged to Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars. Epicgenius (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- By the way, the list entry isn't even reelvant to the topic, and is off-wiki. All the more reason to delete. Epicgenius (talk) 17:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.