MaloneyW.F.C
- MaloneyW.F.C (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
30 January 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- NewInnBee (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Possible block evasion. MaloneyW.F.C was blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. He made several unblock requests but failed to address the reasons for the block. MaloneyW.F.C primarily edited the article Weymouth F.C. (history). The NewInnBee account was created two months after MaloneyW.F.C's last edit and also mostly edits Weymouth FC. Both accounts make large amounts of small edits in quick succession without edit summaries, and despite warnings both have repeatedly removed maintenance tags without attempting to fix the problem they address ([1][2], [3][4]) and repeatedly remove content without explanation ([5], [6]) ([7], [8]). Barret (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note Per behavioral evidence I've blocked NewInnBee. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 20:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
14 December 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Tribe 2 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Aggressive editor showing tendencies of OWNership, edits exclusively the Weymouth F.C. article - looks to be a clear case of DUCK to me but we should AGF and double-check. GiantSnowman 09:28, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- "Clear case of WP:DUCK" and having enough doubt to request a check are mutually exclusive situations. Pick one, please. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 12:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Check declined by a checkuser - It's a moot point, anyway, as the previous accounts are very
Stale. —DoRD (talk) 12:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- I pick DUCK, based behavior which is both consistent and evolving. Indef blocked, tagged, templated, closing. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 03:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
07 May 2013
- Suspected sockpuppets
- JoshM1991 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Similar edit pattern, primarily WP:OWN tendencies at Weymouth F.C. Has removed maintenance templates, removed references and inserted incorrect flags [9], in similar fashion to previous sock Tribe 2 (talk · contribs) [10] [11]. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Quack. Blocked and tagged. Closing. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 10:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)