- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Critical Reader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Phillip Kirby (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected meatpuppets/sockpuppets
128.122.89.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
216.165.95.64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
128.122.89.187 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
WP:SPA accounts re-adding the same text and WP:SPS source to the WP:BLP of William Schniedewind
- Comments
- Conclusions
Phillip Kirby (talk · contribs) is a clear sock. The IPs have not edited the BLP at issue (only the talk page), and are all assigned to NYU; a block there would cause too much collateral damage.
Phillip Kirby indef blocked as a sock; puppeteer blocked 24h. — Coren (talk) 04:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]