Welcome to the assessment department of the Egypt WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Egypt related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Egypt}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed into the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Egypt articles by quality and Category:Egypt articles by importance, which serve as the foundations for an automatically generated worklist. Frequently asked questions
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department. InstructionsQuality assessmentAn article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Egypt}} project banner on its talk page: The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Quality scaleImportance assessmentAn article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Egypt}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Egypt|importance=???}}
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Importance scale
Requesting an assessmentIf you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Assess Talent Management - Egypt's No. 1 Personality Assessment, Ability Assessment and Psychometric Testing Software Company and the smartest choice for HR and OD Managers in the Middle East. I have rewritten most of the article. Nominating it for Good Article status. Zakawer (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC) The entire article was rewritten. The speechmark is also correctly used.It deserves reassessment. Many thanks. I have developed this article from a stub and added new refrences. I think it deserves reassessment. Thank you. Wrote the article from scratch. Isn't much though. More is in the citations. Assess. Contribute. Thanks. :-) I significantly expanded this article from a stub. Please reassess. It needs more Arabic sources. Thanks. I have developed this article from a stub with new references. Please assess it, thank you Rmeares01 (talk) 00:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Education in Egypt and reform by community leaders and educators. I have added external links and reference as evidence of notability ..Please note the corruption in the past regime that was suppressing reform attempts specially by community leaders and scarcity of information and research on the topic.. please check.. thank you Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Please lock at this article and give it a rats , i have created it fast so i dont know if it is good or not. Hi. Please take a look at my article "niqab in Egypt" I have made a lot of changes and it is nominated for good article status and would love your feedback. Noosaelgamoosa (talk) 05:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)noosaelgamoosa I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. MontyofEgypt 18:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC) I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) I have developed this article from a small stub. I think it deserves a new assessment. Thank you. The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) I have expanded a small, stub article into a longer one. DCI2026 (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC) Operation Badr (1973) - complete re-write of the article after moving it (previously called: The Crossing); you can see the difference between the present article and the old one here. With a proper ending I think this article can reach GA-class. Sherif9282 (talk) 18:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Comments by --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 10:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Generally our assessment is for a maximum of B-class. Please do a peer review before nominating for GA
Ask for a peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review to get a review of more then one user.
Done. I corrected a few refs that I spotted myself. I don't suppose there are any more mistakes. Note: I assumed it was Cairo Local Time (since Shazly and Gamasy give the time, and they are Egyptians), but I will check it soon. Anything else with the article? --Sherif9282 (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC) Tamara Siuda -- Significant changes have been made in the past month or so, including layout, content, and the addition of a variety of references. Was rated "Start", I believe now to be "GA". IanCheesman (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Kemetic Orthodoxy -- Complete re-write took place over the past few months, including layout, content, and references. Article is now more than four times the original size, and layout is largely based on that of other religion pages. Was rated "Start", I believe now to be "GA". IanCheesman (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC) It's better but:
--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 08:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Popular pagesPopular pages: A bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles. Assessment log
September 17, 2024Renamed
Reassessed
Assessed
September 16, 2024Reassessed
Assessed
September 15, 2024Reassessed
Assessed
September 14, 2024Reassessed
Assessed
Removed
September 13, 2024Reassessed
Assessed
Removed
September 12, 2024Reassessed
September 11, 2024Assessed
RemovedSeptember 10, 2024Reassessed
|