Contents |
This page is for listing and discussing images that are marked as available under a free license or public domain, but have disputed source or licensing information. Images are listed here for 14 days before they are processed. Images that are tagged with a non-free template should not be listed here.
Instructions
Before listing, remember that images which are already marked unfree and used under fair use should not be listed here.
To list an image on this page:
I |
Edit the image page.
Add {{pui|log=2009 April 23}} to the image page. If the image is in use, also add {{puic|Image_name.ext|log=2009 April 23}} to the caption(s). |
---|---|
II |
Create its PUI subsection.
Follow and list the image using {{subst:pui2|image=Image_name.ext|reason=reason}} ~~~~ (remember to exclude the Image: prefix). |
III |
Give due notice.
Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst:idw-pui|Image_name.ext}}
|
Unlike Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion the primary purpose of this page is to ascertain the source and/or copyright status of an image. Therefore it is not specifically a vote to keep or delete but a forum for the exploration of the copyright status/source of an image and contributions should not be added solely in those terms.
Listings should be processed by an administrator after being listed for 14 days. Images that are accepted following this fourteen-day period should have {{subst:puir}} added to the image talk page and a copy of the issue and/or discussion that took place here put on the image talk page as well. If no objection to the image's deletion is raised, or no proof that the image is indeed free is provided, the image may be deleted without further notice after the 14-day period.
Note: Images can be unlisted immediately if they are indisputably in the public domain or verifiably licensed under an indisputably free license (GFDL, CC-BY-SA, etc.—see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for more on these). An archiving system was implemented July 2007. For older discussions, see the history pages. For all discussions from July 3, 2007 forward, see the Archive.
Holding cell
- These images have been listed for at least 14 days. Images which have been determined to be acceptable may be removed from this page.
- /2009 March 21 - 2 left
- /2009 March 31 - 1 left
- /2009 April 3 - 4 left
- /2009 April 5 - 4 left
- /2009 April 6
- /2009 April 8
- /2009 April 9
New listings
April 10
File:Hammteam.jpg
Uploader claims image has been released into public domain, but the source states:
"Everything on this page is (c) 2000 - 2005 Kristin and the Hamm Family unless otherwise stated. Please do not take without permission. This is Paul and Morgan's Official website. The banner was made using Paint Shop Pro 8.0 and the HTML was written by Kristin. Please do not take anything without asking!"
Radiant chains (talk) 09:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Guyong explotion.jpg
File:Jetnepal.jpg
orphaned, from pixelation appears to be a magazine scan Skier Dude (talk) 16:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Bannerxyz.gif
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would not be the (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 16:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Wilke Cosmo Ready To Upload copy close Crop.jpg
orphaned, (c) self doesn't match summary's source Skier Dude (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:VBA32.png
screenshot of antivirus software - unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Dotfusc.JPG
screenshot of software, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:FSIS08.jpg
software screenshot, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:DhakaGlimpses.JPG
collage of several images, no sources for any - uploader has history of (c) problems Skier Dude (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:DhakaImage.JPG
same as above Skier Dude (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Sharada srinivasan.jpg
No CC at source. — neuro(talk)(review) 16:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Image_name.ext
File:ASEAN Demographics.PNG
Tagged as public domain, but also listed as having a source. There's no evidence here to indicate that the source released the image into the public domain, so this might be unfree. –Drilnoth (T • C) 23:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
April 11
File:Epcot_Scenery.JPG
Theme parks, especially Disneyland, typically impose conditions of entry stating photographs taken within their borders are to be used for non-commercial purposes only. MER-C 04:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure this merely means that the photographer is in breach of contract by distributing the images as free. It does not, however, invalidate the free license that was assigned. It is common practice to allow such images (there are hundreds on Commons, I'm sure). I know this issue has come up before (here for example, you seem to agree that such an image attached to an adhesion contract is acceptable), and I think we need a larger scale policy discussion somewhere (or just ask Mike Godwin) before we decide on individual cases like this. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Album Art-past life experiences.jpg
orphaned 'album art', if legit album unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Agree that this should be deleted. It is unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder of an album cover. Note also that it is not possible to add this image under a fair use rationale to an existing article, as there are no articles on either the band or the album. Awadewit (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Cover Afrique.jpg
orphaned book cover, if legit, uploader would likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Agree that this should be deleted. It is unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder of a book cover. Note also that it is not possible to add this image under a fair use rationale to an existing article, as there does not appear to be an article on this book. Awadewit (talk) 23:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Cover id pass.jpg
orphaned Indonesian passport cover, not sure of (c), but not likely "self" Skier Dude (talk) 07:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Indonesia's coat of arms is not subject to copyright protection, per Commons. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with IronGargoyle. This image appears to be in the PD. Note also that Commons states, quoting a translation of the Indonesian Copyright Act of 2002, "Publication and/or distribution of any work that has been published and/or distributed by or in the name of the Government, except if the copyright of the object is stated as protected, either in law or in writing on the work, at the time the work was published and/or distributed." - We could ask the uploader if there is such a statement in the passport to make sure. Thoughts on this? Awadewit (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Cover sheet.jpg
orphaned, no source, appears to be Burlington Northern material Skier Dude (talk) 07:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this image should be deleted. It appears to be Burlington Northern material, as Skier Dude, says and there does not seem to be any obvious article to which we can add the image under a fair use rationale. Awadewit (talk) 00:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Cover sheet1.jpg
orphaned, no source, appears to be Burlington Northern material Skier Dude (talk) 07:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this image should be deleted. It appears to be Burlington Northern material, as Skier Dude, says and there does not seem to be any obvious article to which we can add the image under a fair use rationale. Awadewit (talk) 00:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Cover1.jpg
orphaned magazine(?) cover, if legit, uploader would not likely be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this file should be deleted. The "cover" may be owned by the uploader (it is very amateurish), but it is impossible to verify this. The uploader made only a handful of edits back in December 2008 (all were image uploads) and hasn't responded to any talk page messages. Awadewit (talk) 00:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Cover2.jpg
orphaned magazine(?) cover, if legit, uploader would not likely be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 07:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this file should be deleted. The "cover" may be owned by the uploader (it is very amateurish), but it is impossible to verify this. The uploader made only a handful of edits back in December 2008 (all were image uploads) and hasn't responded to any talk page messages. Awadewit (talk) 00:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Csabaa.jpg
orphaned, appears to be book cover, if legit, uploader would likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this image should be deleted. It is unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. I am not sure what article this would be appropriate for, as the title is not in English. I was going to contact the uploader and recommend that they create a FUR, but I see they have been banned. Awadewit (talk) 00:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Final Logo BLUE jpeg.jpg
orphaned logo, if legit, uploader not likely the (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 08:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- This logo cannot be copyrighted. WP:LOGO explains that a logo will be copyright-free if it "is simply a sequence of letters or written words: characters from a typeface are uncopyrightable in the U.S., so logos that consist purely of characters from a typeface are also uncopyrightable." Note, however, that some group may have a trademark claim on the logo. Awadewit (talk) 00:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Final Logo SF.PNG
orphaned logo, if legit, uploader not likely the (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 08:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- This image was apparently replaced by a different version which is used in the article Spring Fest. It is now orphaned and should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 00:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Spring Fest Logo.PNG
orphaned logo, if legit, uploader not likely the (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 08:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- This is being used at Spring Fest. I have left a message on the article talk page asking the editors to provide a FUR for it. Awadewit (talk) 00:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Sharada srinivasan dance.jpg
No GFDL at source. — neuro(talk)(review) 08:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this image should be deleted. There is no evidence that the image was released under the GFDL at the source. Awadewit (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Vijayan k pillai.jpg
No mention of CC at source. — neuro(talk)(review) 08:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this image should be deleted. There is no evidence that it has been released under CC-by-SA at the source. Awadewit (talk) 00:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Vankat rangan.png
Website states "© Copyright 2008 Amrita Technologies" — neuro(talk)(review) 08:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- If this image is exempt from the general copyright claim, there is no indication of that (particularly since the PNG file is linked directly). I agree that this image should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 00:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Ettimadai.jpg
Source states "© 2009 Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham" — neuro(talk)(review) 08:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this image should be deleted. This image comes from a series of images labeled "Campus tour", each of which is explicitly labeled "Copyright 2005 Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham". Awadewit (talk) 00:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:APTIS FAM Card 4.JPG
File:FAM Card 1.png
File:FAM Card 2.png
File:FAM Card 3.png
File:APTIS Status Code FAM (1).JPG
File:APTIS Status Code CHFAM.JPG
File:APTIS Status Code FAM (2).JPG
File:APTIS Status Code FAMCH.JPG
File:Bitemewhydoesthishavetobesohard.jpg
orphaned logo, if legit, uploader would not likely be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 16:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- This is a duplicate, but I'm not sure how to delete it. Uploading images seems to be beyond my comprehension, even now. Thanks. Flowanda | Talk 01:32, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I deleted one copy and I see you also uploaded it to Commons as File:Peanutlogo.jpg (wich is the one actualy used in the Shaking Ray Levis article, and that I have now tagged as lacking permission confirmation as well), what you have not done however is adress the actual issue here: On what basis can you say that the copyright holder of the logo have agreed to release it under the GFDL / CC-BY-SA-2.0 dual license combination? Are you personaly the sole copyright holder of this logo as the current information implies? Or do you have any correspondence with the copyright holder(s) indicating that they wish to release the logo under this license? If you do please forward such correspondense to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, if not the Commons version should be delted and this one should be put into Shaking Ray Levis in it's place with the license changed to {{Non-free logo}} along with a "standard" logo non-free use rationale. --Sherool (talk) 16:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Re-tag as {{Non-free logo}} and replace the Commons version currently in the Shaking Ray Levis article (unless permission to release under free license is confirmed naturaly), per my comment above. --Sherool (talk) 16:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
File:SmushLAL06.JPG
orphaned, no source, appears to be professional shot Skier Dude (talk) 17:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that this image should be deleted. This looks professional to me as well, particularly since it has no metadata and is such a good "action shot". Awadewit (talk) 00:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:RITA2.jpg
The image is one of rita disk cover. i didn't found it in google images, but as you can see from the user talk page, most of his uploads was copyright violations Itzike (talk) 17:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what album this is a cover for. Is it Rita (album)? If so, we should at least try to leave a note on the article talk page asking for a FUR before we delete the image. Awadewit (talk) 00:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:ZP show intro.jpg
Also nominated for the same reason:
Tagged with {{PD-Yugoslavia}}, but it obviously doesn't have anything to do with either Yugoslavia or public domain (screenshot of a TV show). —Admiral Norton (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Tagged with PD-Yugoslavia because it has a lot to do with former Yugoslavia. The tag itself reads: "exempt from copyright protection by the Agreement on succession issues; Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Slovenia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, being in sovereign equality the five successor States to the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, have agreed in Vienna on 29th of June 2001. The Agreement came to power on 2004-03-25." Croatia is one of the aforementioned successor states. It also arguably has a lot to do with public domain. Following texts are from Wikpedia sourcs: "The public domain is generally defined (e.g. by the U.S. Copyright Office) as the sum of works that are not copyrighted, i.e. that were not eligible for copyright in the first place, or whose copyright has expired." On the picture entitled "Closingcredits.jpg" it is clearly visible the tv show lists no copyright information in the closing credits. "There is no globally valid "International Copyright Law" that would take precedence over local laws." Croatia is not in the EU yet, so the EU Directive on harmonising the term of copyright protection does not apply. The pictures proposed for deletion are screenshots of a Croatian NATIONAL GOVERNMENT-OWNED television station. Being government property the PD-Yugoslavia tag applies. These pictures are of importance to the article because they reinforce the notability of the person who is the subject. They simply show the person's media coverage. Turqoise127 (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
In addition, upon further research, an actual copyright law for Croatia was recently established on 22 October 2003 [1](Croatian National Journal 167/03, the text of the newly established law in Croatian) and later in 2007. Following is a Guide printed by a Croatian Ministry that informs of copyright laws harmonization coming up in 2009 because of the impending accession to the European Union; [2]. Regardless, taking into consideration that this show aired (06 September 2003) before even the initial copyright laws were introduced (October 2003), we again arrive to the conclusion that the subject matter is public domain and the PD-Yugoslavia tag is the most appropriate tag for these pictures currently. I kindly request these pictures not be deleted, please allow Wikipedia to be what it is: a great source of information and pictures if the copyright status is adequately explained and defended which I believe is the case here. Thank you. Turqoise127 (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
April 12
File:Dale Earnhardt Jr..jpg
File:Xtina zae.jpg
Low resolution shot taken from elsewhere. The uploader and his meatpuppets became surprisingly quiet when asked for the original. Not used, as a stronger image is used as the lead. J Milburn (talk) 09:53, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- delete, per request. Already had some obvious copyvios from this user and sockpupets on Commons, not trustful. --Martin H. (talk) 19:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
File:ABS-CBN 55th.png
Apparently a commercial logo. I doubt it has been released into the public domain. J Milburn (talk) 11:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- This logo, which is owned by ABS-CBN broadcasting, requires a fair use rationale to justify its inclusion in ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation. I have left a note at the article talk page requesting that such a rationale be provided. Awadewit (talk) 23:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Shakira mtv unplugged.jpg
Screenshot of MTV program, claimed to be public domain. Orphaned image. Radiant chains (talk) 15:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- As this image appeared on TV program on MTV, it is owned by MTV. It would require a fair use justification. However, it is currently orphaned and therefore no fair use justification can be provided. This should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 23:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Dinosaur.JPG
This is a 2D image of a 3D sculpture or other work of art, and therefore the image can't be free. –Drilnoth (T • C) 17:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- We need to establish where the sculpture is. Freedom of panorama varies by country. I've left a note at the uploader's talk page. Awadewit (talk) 23:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- See discussion at User talk:Awadewit#Dinosaur. Awadewit (talk) 00:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
April 13
File:Nashik city.jpg
too small to be 100% sure, but it appears that there is a (c) watermark in the lower left-hand corner Skier Dude (talk) 00:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- There does indeed seem to be a watermark there. If the uploader cannot explain this in some way, I agree that the image should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 03:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:My girl.png
appears to be screencap from film, uploader not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Skier Dude that this appears to be a frame from a film and that the uploader is not the copyright holder. As such, it should have a FUR. I'm not sure what article this image should be in, so I cannot even contact the appropriate editors. We should therefore delete it. Awadewit (talk) 03:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Radiologo.jpg
orphaned, no source, if legit logo, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Per WP:LOGO, this image cannot be copyrighted because the logo is purely typeface. It can be trademarked, however. Awadewit (talk) 03:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Rv16.jpg
series of game screenshots for Roma Victor, all incorrectly licensed PD - including File:Rv13.jpg File:Rv13.jpg File:Rv11.jpg File:Rv8.jpg File:Rv9.jpg File:Rv7.jpg File:Rv5.jpg File:Rv3.jpg File:Rv4.jpg File:Rv2.jpg File:Rv1a.jpg Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- I've left a note at the Talk:Roma Victor#Non-free images. Perhaps one of the editors there will help add some FURs. If that does not happen, these should definitely be deleted as the copyright is owned by the software company. Awadewit (talk) 04:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Lindberg Southern Belle riverboat kit.jpg
If it's a photography of the box front, wouldn't the publisher (Lindberg Models) own the copyright to that, since it isn't in the public domain? As such, it would be a non-free image which isn't appropriate as used at 1:64 scale. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that the copyright is owned by the publisher. The editors at that article should at least be given a chance to write a FUR, however. I've left a note at Talk:1:64 scale#Non-free image. If a FUR is not forthcoming, the image should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Schway screenshot.png
Screenshot of a commercial website. I doubt this has been released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 10:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- This image is copyrighted by the Schway corporation (see website). As it is feasible that a shot of the company's website might be justified on the company's article, I've left a note at Talk:Schway regarding the use of fair use images and encouraging the editors to add a FUR. Without the addition of a FUR, however, this image should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 04:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Clifford zavoloka.jpg
Album cover. Almost certainly not released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 11:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed - few album covers are. Moreover, the website from which this was downloaded claims a copyright over the entire site for Zavoloka. This should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 04:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Zavoloka-Agf.jpg
Album cover. Almost certainly not released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 11:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed - few album covers are. Moreover, the website from which this was downloaded claims a copyright over the entire site for Zavoloka. This should be deleted. Awadewit (talk) 04:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Zavoloka-PLAVYNA.jpg
Album cover. Almost certainly not released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 11:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:EGHS logo.JPG
orphaned, low quality, if legit logo, uploader would not likely be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Brian budd.jpg
multiple conflicting licenses; highly doubt CC2.5 is correct Skier Dude (talk) 17:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:DWW 07-06-2008 11;40;16AM.JPG
orphaned, appears to be scan of book, not a photo Skier Dude (talk) 17:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:DWW 07EEE3~1 (2).JPG
given pixelation & blur (left side), appears to be scan of book or newpaper article, not of picture Skier Dude (talk) 17:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Timothy D. Hobart GetAttachment.jpg
given odd size of image & artifacts, appears to be book scan Skier Dude (talk) 17:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Will. 07-05-2008 11;43;35PM.JPG
clearly scan of book & not a picture Skier Dude (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:David 204.jpg
scan of professionally-distributed football cards, not photos Skier Dude (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Upton 1967 h2.jpg
appears to be a yearbook or similar scan, not a photo Skier Dude (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Bankston 07-04-2008 03;43;19PM.JPG
given image artifacts & odd top border, appears to be scan of newspaper or similar source Skier Dude (talk) 19:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Bradshaw 07-04-2008 03;26;51PM.JPG
from pixelation & odd top border, appears to be scan of yearbook or other similar source Skier Dude (talk) 19:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Brewer 07-04-2008 03;22;53PM.JPG
from pixelation/crosshatching, appears to be scan of yearbook or other similar source Skier Dude (talk) 19:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Bruce Crawford MSP.jpg
no source provided, appears to be official headshot Skier Dude (talk) 19:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Christine Grahame MSP.jpg
no source, from background appears to be official headshot Skier Dude (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
April 14
File:NextG.svg
orphaned, if legit logo, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Choijiwoohimeo.jpg
orphaned, no source, appears to be official promotional shot Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Keene dennis c.jpg
orphaned, given background appears to be an official photo Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Native.jpg
orphaned screenshot, uploader most likely not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:JaaniPeuhu.jpg
Tagged {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}, but no other information is given. This is a relatively low-resolution image with no metadata; there is no evidence that the uploader is indeed the creator of the image. The caption for this image in Jaani Peuhu identifies it as a "Peuhu Promo Pic", which seems to imply that it comes from a third-party source. —Bkell (talk) 12:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Rafiqui.jpg
"PAF" is not a source, it's a string of three letters. Need to have the proper source in order to verify the GFDL claim. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Presumably "PAF" refers to the Pakistan Air Force, which is prominently mentioned in the Sarfaraz Ahmed Rafiqui article that uses this image. All the same, I agree that it is vague and insufficient information. —Bkell (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Spokeo logo.png
recreated a deleted file: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3ASpokeo+logo.jpg Used only for a spammy article akaDruid (talk) 14:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:AZIZ-BHATTI.jpg
"PMA" is not a sufficient source to check GFDL status. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- It seems likely, based on the Raja Aziz Bhatti article in which this image is used, that "PMA" refers to the Pakistan Military Academy. That being said, I agree that it is vague and insufficient information. —Bkell (talk) 23:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MinarikOfficialFilePhoto.JPG
"Official file photo" in the filename indicates that it is unlikely that the uploader holds the copyright as claimed in the license tag. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- It's a larger version of http://www.monroegop.com/i/stephen-minarik.jpg . Does one tag with Template:Db-g12 in this case? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 16:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Image_name.ext
File:Chiarello negro leagues.jpg
I'm not sure the uploader actually has permission from the publisher for it to be GFDL, but even then, it's not be used right now. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- File is byte-identical to the larger image of the book on Amazon.com. — Ken g6 (talk) 01:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Holmeswidesg.jpg
Reportedly self-made, but appears to be a software screenshot – Quadell (talk) 20:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's an edited photograph certainly, but I'm not quite sure what you mean by "software screen shot". Is there any reason to believe that the uploader is not an amateur astronomer? The uploader doesn't have a history of copyright violations. I would assume good faith here. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Holmessg.jpg
same as above – Quadell (talk) 20:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- See my comment above. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Parkingticketcontract.jpg
This is an image of a ticket for a parking facility, tagged {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}}. If there is any copyright here, presumably it belongs to the ticket company or the parking company. If the ticket itself is not copyrighted, then surely this image cannot be either—it is a faithful reproduction of the ticket, with little to no element of creativity. Either way, the GFDL tag seems inappropriate. —Bkell (talk) 23:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. The copyright is held by the parking company. Stifle (talk) 13:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't think there's any meaningfully copyrightable creative content other than their logo. Their name and telephone number at the top is uncopyrightable telephone directory information. The legal language is the same verbatim language on just about every US parking ticket in existence for years and extremely unlikely to have been created by this company. Legal text is rarely considered creative work or the subject of "copyright" claims. Absent any assertion by a putative "rights holder" that this is a copyvio, I'd just say leave it! Reswobslc (talk) 21:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
April 15
File:Library Roosevelt Study Center Wikipedia.JPG
Image appears at http://www.roosevelt.nl/smartsite.dws?ch=RSC&id=1034. No evidence of a GFDL license. fuzzy510 (talk) 02:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Vestryhall.jpg
Just confused here. Image is tagged as both being in the public domain and being fair-use. One is wrong, obviously. fuzzy510 (talk) 03:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's in the public domain and it is also used as a logo for the Ancient Monuments Society; because I used the word "logo" in the description, a bot then tagged it as a logo. I have now removed all mentions of logo so hopefully that won't happen again. SilkTork *YES! 07:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Mizraab.jpg
no source given for the 4 base photos used herein Skier Dude (talk) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Skier Dude (talk) 04:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MC1pyayroadfront.JPG
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle (talk) 14:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Npdcityhall.jpg
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle (talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:NayPyiTaw.jpg
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Stifle (talk) 14:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MC1inside.JPG
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Ministrybuilding.JPG
Based on the uploader's other recent image uploads, it appears very likely that this image has just been taken from another website. Notice that the metadata on the various images refers to a wide range of camera makes; it is unlikely that someone would own so many cameras. Stifle (talk) 14:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Andrei kozlov.jpg
Here the photo is claimed to be made by Reuters. I was unable to find the original Reuters photo, but still seems to be copyvio. Blacklake (talk) 15:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Butterfeild.jpg
This link http://encarta.msn.com/media_461536702_761581480_-1_1/Alexander_Butterfield.html on the encarta web site from where this image was downloaded seems to indicate that this image is the property of the Corbis Bettman archive. There is no indication that this image was taken by employee of the Executive Office of the President of the United States. Captain-tucker (talk) 16:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Mona-Chopra.jpg
orphaned, appears to be professional headshot, no source Skier Dude (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Epididymovasostomy.jpg
No indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Time To Patency.jpg
no indication of release of (c) at source Skier Dude (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Adding the following by the same uploader for the same reason: File:IVF ICSI.jpg File:Microsurgical vasovasostomy.jpg File:Vasovasostomy Layer Diagram.jpg Skier Dude (talk) 19:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:DLogieL.jpg
Image appears to be copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/DLogieL.jpg and although the uploader claims to be the copyright holder, that's not likely to be true based on other copyright violations. Whpq (talk) 19:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MEHSbldgL.jpg
Image is copied from http://www.mehsa.org/images/MEHSbldgL.jpg and according to http://www.mehsa.org/MEHSbldgL.htm, the image is courtesy of Kyaw Thinn, so unless User:Sky89 is this person, they are not the copyright holder. Based on contribution history, this is very unlikely. Whpq (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:TDT New Logo white on blacksmall2.jpg
Logo for the Toronto Dance Theatre; no evidence of any permission to publish under Creative Commons. fuzzy510 (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Appointment certificate for Franz Josef Popp 1917.jpg
An IP expressed the following concern: BMW is not a German court. I assume the IP does not know about PUF, so I am vouching here even though I think the IP doesn't understand what this document is. Ipatrol (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} in any case. Stifle (talk) 10:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. Clearly in the public domain per {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Kknjsp.jpg
orphaned, no reason to believe this was released under GNU Skier Dude (talk) 22:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Komennewbrandpostcard.jpg
orphaned, highly doubt that uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Rac seal green625.png
orphaned logo, doubtful uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 23:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Roughrider.gif
orphaned logo, if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 23:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
April 16
File:Brezhnev1936.jpg
Appears to be unfree: fails {{PD-Russia-2008}}, as we do not know the author, and it is unclear if this is from a film (it appears to be a picture). Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, this is a 1936 photograph taken by an anonymous photographer. This is exactly {{PD-Russia-2008}} requirement Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- For an anonymous work in the EU, I know that "every effort must be shown that the original author of the work was not credited". In this case, I think we just don't know who it is because our source is insufficient. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Retagged, OK for en.wikipedia. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Btpcrest.jpeg
from source page: © British Transport Police 2008. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Bulibasa.jpg
Even if this picture were taken in the interwar period (1919-39), this photo would likely not be in the public domain in the EU. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:CharlesHRamsey.jpg
dc.gov: "United States and foreign copyright laws and international conventions protect the contents of the Site. You agree to abide by all copyright notices posted on the Site. " Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
The above notice is a disclaimer for contents of the site that are not products of the U.S. Federal Government. It is not a copyright notice on the contents as a whole. Washington D.C. is a federally administered district governed under the authority of the United States Congress. Official works (such as an official portrait of its police chief), and the large majority of website contents would be covered under {{PD-USGov}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)- Never mind, apparently Washington DC is not considered part of the U.S. Government copyright exemption. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:03, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Bobbarkerpriceisriht.jpeg
Low-res...bad quality ViperSnake151 Talk 15:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Dwightc.jpg
Source for this image is http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKchapin.jpg which has nothing to do with the Executive Office of the President of the United States. There is no indication that this photo was taken by a member of the White House staff. No hits on a tineye search. Captain-tucker (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:YB TownCentreReRoute Sept2002.gif
Appears to be an image of a copyright advertisement. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Patriarca-Lazzara.JPG
Highly dubious; orphaned here at en.wiki; deleted from Commons; lacks source information etc. —Danorton (talk) 14:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
April 17
File:Patriarca-Lazzara.JPG
Highly dubious; orphaned here at en.wiki; deleted from Commons; lacks source information etc. —Danorton (talk) 01:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Bleriot.jpg
Image of a sticker manufactured in 2006 by a United States firm- this does not qualify as Freedom of panorama and is thus a non-free image. Its acceptability under fair use guidelines is questionable at best, as in neither case of usage is there specific commentary on the image itself. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note that this same image was also just deleted from Commons as a copyvio (I don't recall the filename, unfortunately). —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 14:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Coin roman licinius close-up.png
no indication of public domain; uploader stated in summary "deemed fair use." Orphaned image. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
File:FastandLoose.jpg
"Author, myself--from Haydn, Whit, "School for Scoundrels Notes on Fast and Loose," 2000." would seem to indicate that the image is from a copyrighted book. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 15:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Kanymtv1.jpg
Uses a Flickr free license but the member's account has been deleted there, so there is no way to verify if this is correct. Aspects (talk) 17:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
File:KanyGolddisk.jpg
Uses a Flickr free license but the member's account has been deleted there, so there is no way to verify if this is correct. Aspects (talk) 17:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
File:KanyGarciaInew.jpg
Orphaned image that uses a Flickr free license but the member's account has been deleted there, so there is no way to verify if this is correct. Aspects (talk) 17:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Jordana fast .JPEG
The uploader has licenced stating they are the copyright holder, however, he also states that it was found using a google image search and gives a url to a website (which doesn't currently work) from where it was downloaded. The copyright for the image will most likely belong to the photographer and/or the website which hosted the image. JD554 (talk) 20:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Somebody edit for me and says that i found the image in google image search, but is a li. I add now, the real summary. The image was taken from her OFFICIAL FAN SITE and i gave the right url. please check again,before you deleted!!
thank u! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loveableone (talk • contribs) 03:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
April 18
File:Candelabra Roman Numerals2.jpg
templated license and "permission" sections are inconsistent - permission states "all rights reserved" Skier Dude (talk) 00:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Festum Album Candelabra2.jpg
templated license and "permission" sections are inconsistent - permission states "all rights reserved" Skier Dude (talk) 00:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Territorial support group organisational chart.jpg
If this image was made by the uploader, I'd expect the original file, rather than a photo of it. IMHO, it's probably a photo of an official chart. h2g2bob (talk) 00:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- It is a photo of an official chart, released under the Freedom of Information Act, my copyright notice applied to the photograph, I wasn't claiming to have produced the chart itself, I didn't think that was necessary.
- Wnjr (talk) 01:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- It is clearly a photograph of a chart, there are no copyright claims seen on the document photographed, and the photographer has clearly given permission for it to be reproduced. Where is the problem? Bristle-krs (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Earl Klugh.jpg
orphaned, appears to be publicity shot Skier Dude (talk) 03:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Emma Lahana.jpg
orphaned, appears to be screenshot Skier Dude (talk) 03:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:ErpenbachHeadShot.jpg
summary "Source = Jon Erpenbach, photographed by WI State Senate photographer for hire" is not consistent with license Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Eunhyuk.JPG
orphaned, no source, appears to be publicity shot Skier Dude (talk) 03:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Fb1a4c27-ecca-44e1-a759-4a3fa2f3041f.jpg
orphaned, no source, given the angle, appears to be professional shot Skier Dude (talk) 03:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Fethullah Gulen.jpg
orphaned, no source, appears to be professional shot Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:GaryImhoffWymorePic.JPG
pretty clear this is a screenshot Skier Dude (talk) 04:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:GrahamJack.jpg
orphaned, given crosshatching 'tis likely a screenshot Skier Dude (talk) 04:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Greg Marcks on set of Echelon Conspiracy.JPG
no source, no metadata, absent uploader, given image quality appears to be professional shot Skier Dude (talk) 04:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Henry Hobbs photo IMG 1366.JPG
orphaned, appears to be a picture of a picture (upper R corner), no source for original Skier Dude (talk) 04:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Herbalpertfreecolour1.jpg
high quality image, appears to be professional shot, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 04:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Hilburn 07-04-2008 03;59;34PM.JPG
appears to be scan of yearbook or other such source - source not provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Huntington Hartford and Diane Hartford.jpg
orphaned, appear to be professional shot Skier Dude (talk) 04:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:JaredGoldTopHat.jpg
absent uploader, appears to be publicity shot, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 04:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Jim Mather MSP.jpg
appears to be publicity headshot, no source Skier Dude (talk) 04:31, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Kenny Gibson MSP.jpg
given background & image quality most likely a professional headshot Skier Dude (talk) 04:33, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:LG Official Headshot.jpg
no source, given image title & summary ("official headshot") it's unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 04:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Jpastner.jpg
I think this is a screenshot from the video on this page. The camera angle is the same, the image size is about identical, and there's some aliasing that would be indicative of a web video instead of a photo taken at a press conference. fuzzy510 (talk) 06:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:PICHONBARON.JPG
not sure of the French (c) laws, but I'm pretty sure the uploader isn't the (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:CANTENACBROWN.JPG
Very unlikely that the uploader is the (c) holder of the wine label Skier Dude (talk) 06:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:StPierre.JPG
Very unlikely that the uploader is the (c) holder of the wine label Skier Dude (talk) 06:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:BRANAIRE-LABEL.JPG
Very unlikely that the uploader is the (c) holder of the wine label Skier Dude (talk) 06:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Silvernetlogo10w377632.png
explicit copyright in image, missing ORTS tag Toddst1 (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Gsmanual.jpg
Uploader claims GFDL, but image appears to be scan from copyrighted instruction manual. Daram.G (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:SDGamesLogo.jpg
No source, appears to be logo of SnapDragon Games, but uploader is likely not to be (c) holder. See also File:SDGamesLogo.gif. — Ken g6 (talk) 19:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Lego Phil boswell.JPG
Near duplicate of deleted File:Lego Phil Boswell.JPG, which was already deleted per PUI. — neuro(talk) 21:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
April 19
File:DSC_03172350.jpg
Source is a Flickr page that no longer exists. Unable to verify the license. – Quadell (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Maggie-Brooks.jpg
WP:COPYVIO of http://www.monroegop.com/i/maggie-brooks.jpg; User:Mountmiey's claim of PD-USGov appears to be false. DanielPenfield (talk) 17:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Elizab2.jpg
appears to be scan of yearbook, thus (c) would not be held by uploader Skier Dude (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Israel Houghton in 2008.jpg
given size & lack of metadata, and given the uploader's name (IntegrityMedia1) this is most likely a promo shot Skier Dude (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Irrfan Khan.jpg
orphaned, absent uploader, appears to be a publicity shot Skier Dude (talk) 20:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:KristinChenowethPD777.jpg
orphaned, appears to be a publicity shot Skier Dude (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:1936 Low card.jpg
Has 1926 copyright notice & no reason to assume this not renewed or that uploader owns copyright. Simon Speed (talk) 21:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- It says in the image description, quite clearly, that this image has been released freely by its owner. I will happily forward this permission email to anyone who asks me. Ask on my talk page, though, as I won't check back on this page. fish&karate 15:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Linda Fabiani MSP.jpg
Given focus & background appears to be an official headshot - uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 21:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Logan Joe HS0809.jpg
given focus & background & summary "headshot", unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 21:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Lopamudra.jpg
given crosshatching (no metadata), it appears that this is a screenshot, no source provided Skier Dude (talk) 21:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MMlogoreal.jpeg
claims to be band logo, if so, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 21:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Mahan IMG 0829.JPG
orphaned, badly cropped photograph of another photograph - possibly PD-old? Skier Dude (talk) 21:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MK Asante Jr.jpg
no source provided, appears to be professional shot Skier Dude (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Marc My Words album cover - Marc Nelson.jpg
album cover, claims to be "100% my original work.", if this is not the official cover it doesn't belong here Skier Dude (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:TonyGrantSinger.jpg
appears to be professional headshot, thus uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:TerrellPhillips.jpg
appears to be professional headshot, thus uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 21:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Indrajit gupta mp.jpg
given border, low resolution, lack of metadata, suspect taken from uncited web site Skier Dude (talk) 21:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Birensasmal.gif
given quality of image & dates of subject, most likely a scan of a newspaper or other source Skier Dude (talk) 21:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Mark L. Walberg.JPG
orphaned, given resolution & focus appears to be publicity/professional shot Skier Dude (talk) 22:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MatthewMorrisonHeadshot.jpg
appears to be publicity headshot, thus the (c) would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 22:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:WilliamMiller-ca1846.png
really doubt that the uploader of this image is the (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 22:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:NathanHKnorr-WTPres.png
appears to be a publicity shot, complete with signature Skier Dude (talk) 22:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Benito Arias Montano.png
highly doubt that the uploader is the (c) holder of this most likely PD-old Skier Dude (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Near-duplicate of this image from Commons (better sourcing there). Painting is by Francisco Pacheco, and this artist has been dead for hundreds of years. PD-old. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MargaretKeane.png
given resolution & artifacts, appears to be screenshot or scan Skier Dude (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Walter Ralston Martin ca 1983.png
given slight blur is most likely a screenshot of an older TV programme Skier Dude (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MiltonGeorgeHenschel.png
given image quality, bad cropping, 'tis most likely a screenshot of a TV programme Skier Dude (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:JosephWTkachJr.png
given image quality, appears to be publicity shot Skier Dude (talk) 22:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Moreland 1956 h17.jpg
appears to be a scan of a yearbook, no source provided Skier Dude (talk) 22:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Michot 07-04-2008 03;47;02PM.JPG
given crosshatching 'tis a scan or screenshot, no source provided Skier Dude (talk) 22:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Mike Weir MP.jpg
given focus & resolution & background, appears to be publicity headshot Skier Dude (talk) 22:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Miriam.GIF
given crosshatching, no metadata, bad photoshopping & border, most likely taken from non-sourced website & then altered Skier Dude (talk) 22:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Nancy Landry.jpg
given background & focus, most likely official government photo, no source Skier Dude (talk) 22:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:NormanLacy at 63yo W150.jpg
orphaned, given background & focus, most likely official publicity shot Skier Dude (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Oliver Heald MP in 2005.jpg
orphaned, given background & focus, most likely official publicity shot Skier Dude (talk) 22:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
April 20
File:Tiananmendifference.jpg
possible blatant copyvio, user claims ownership of a screenshot of Google -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 01:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Suganya.jpg
The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 02:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
April 21
April 22
File:Johndelaney.jpg
given pixelation/ image quality, most likely a screenshot Skier Dude (talk) 01:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Russellbrand2007.jpg
Image has watermark, taken from non-free website but asserts permission. No OTRS info. (EhJJ)TALK 02:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Tashee.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I strongly suspect this, and all other uploads by Persia2 (listed below) are copyvios. – Quadell (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MazarShohada.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MILAD TOWERR03.JPG
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MILAD TOWERR01.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Tehran Highway.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Majlis01.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Majlis02.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Majlis03.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Derafsh2.gif
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:MILAD TOWERR04.JPG
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Tehran-Tower01.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Tehran-Tower02.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Tehran-Tower03.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Milad tower new 03.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Milad Tower000.jpg
Uploaded by Persia2, a sockpuppet of Iran2 who was indef-blocked for repeated mass-uploads of copyrighted images. I would presume this image is copyrighted as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:1605 spo p20 n11.jpg
Uploader has a history of uploading unfree images, this image is: Web resolution, no metadata or metadata contradictory to prior uploads (the uploader claims to be the owner of 2 or 3 different high professional cameras). It is obvious that the uploader is not the photographer like claimed. He is not eligible to release all rights on this image and give it away to everyone for unrestricted (commercial) reuse. --Martin H. (talk) 23:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:WaleedAbdullah1.JPG
see one above Martin H. (talk) 23:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Abdoh15.PNG
see two above Martin H. (talk) 23:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
April 23
File:SheepskinDiploma.jpg
1948 creation date means it may not be PD in Mexico, GFDL or CC would not apply regardless. MBisanz talk 04:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
File:KodakSummerGirl2.jpg
Commercial image, no OTRS permissions. MBisanz talk 05:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Footer
Today is April 23, 2009. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 April 23 -- ()
Please remember to add new nominations to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/NewListings.
If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:pui log}} to the top of the day's page.
Please ensure "===April 23===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Possibly unfree files page (the one you're on now) work.