Welcome to my talk page!Welcome to my talk page. Please feel welcome and feel free to let me know anything. Say I've made a mistake, then kindly notify me. I don't mind Twinkle messages (they're quite convenient), but they can be embarrassing. If you need help, I'll give you all the help I can, and if I promise to help you but I forget, remind me! General talk page notes for the newcomers:
PLEASE NOTE: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. I do not often use the {{Talkback}} template, but I will if you are inquiring me for the first time, chances are I will. Also, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. |
Archives
|
||
|
Detox_(Dr._Dre_album)Penguin, The Detox_(Dr._Dre_album)#Guests_and_production is getting out of hand IMO. And one could argue the whole article. I'm writing on your talk page instead of the article page because I see that you have experience in creating and reviewing music articles to good status and may be with some help we can make this one do the same. I think the background section is ok but is starting to spill over into guest and production. And I don't know why there is a singles section when there have been no confirmed tracks. Let me know what you think and we can start a discussion on what to do on the article's talk page. Thanks! ChadH (talk) 23:09, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
WikiCup 2012 February newsletterRound 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was Grapple X (submissions), again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was Tigerboy1966 (submissions), thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were Ruby2010 (submissions), Cwmhiraeth (submissions), Miyagawa (submissions) and Casliber (submissions). February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from Ruby2010 (submissions). At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher. The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design. The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC) |