Archives: [ 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Contents
- 1 enfield paul (talk · contribs)
- 2 Re: Howdy
- 3 William A. Brown nominated for deletion
- 4 Proposed deletion of William A. Brown
- 5 Re-write report request
- 6 Jury Trial - help
- 7 License tagging for File:RLRL AUTOFIX example.gif
- 8 Forty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India listed at Redirects for discussion
- 9 Eighty-sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India listed at Redirects for discussion
- 10 Please Don't Chang These Edits Thank You.
- 11 Reference errors on 28 April
- 12 Continuing issue with East Coast hip hop
enfield paul (talk · contribs)
please can you return the article kingston hospital radio to my sandbox. i do not understand what you mean by redirects etc, and I find the wikipedia guidelines confusing and complicated. i work for the charity involved so am not sure how why i don't seem to be able to use our content. all i need is for someone to say do this, don't do this in relation to my article. if necessary i will move it to a special page. thanks.
Re: Howdy
You can at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
William A. Brown nominated for deletion
Proposed deletion of William A. Brown
![Ambox warning yellow.svg](https://web.archive.org/web/20150613095901im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article William A. Brown has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Flagged with unref in 2012 with no action since then. No dates, no cites, only one sentence, and not able to find information on him that migt improve the article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eric Cable | Talk 13:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Agree, this should probably be deleted. It was added to disambiguate the similarly named diplomat, William Andreas Brown. While I was able to confirm that they're not the same person (the dates, jobs and locale made it feasible that they were), I could not find much on the Bishop either other than that he exists and that, by virtue of his position, is/was probably notable. - TB (talk) 16:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Re-write report request
Could you re-produce the two reports as defined in Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/Lists of pages/Chembox templates transclusion count? Old page can be overwritten. -DePiep (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Jury Trial - help
I saw your revert at Jury Trial. The editor, Gerrytlloyd is adding the same material in seven different articles. Started out as highly POV with no refs, then refs that didn't mention what was being sourced and now information so watered down, it doesn't look too belong in the article. I'm getting to involved in this and could use some neutral eyes. Bgwhite (talk) 07:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
License tagging for File:RLRL AUTOFIX example.gif
Thanks for uploading File:RLRL AUTOFIX example.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Forty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Forty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India. Since you had some involvement with the Forty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ninney (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Eighty-sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eighty-sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India. Since you had some involvement with the Eighty-sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ninney (talk) 00:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Please Don't Chang These Edits Thank You.
Please Don't Chang These Edits Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.138.25 (talk) 14:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 28 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:
- On the Ohio State Buckeyes football page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )
- On the History of Dedham, Massachusetts, 1635–1792 page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). ( | )
- On the Mean systemic pressure page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). ( | )
Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Continuing issue with East Coast hip hop
Hi Topbanana! You recently semi-protected East Coast hip hop due to serial abuse from an IP-user. That protection expired two days ago and someone from that same IP block is reverting (my) edits on the article. I'm still learning about managing these sorts of situations, but I'd love it if you can take a look and advise how I should proceed here. (The revert in question is 17:52, 6 May 2015, but I plan on making a few more edits, which might also be reverted). Many thanks for help and guidance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by J D (talk • contribs)
- update: I made the change again and asked the user to provide a reference on the IP address's talk page. So far it's stuck. J D (talk) 23:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Howdy. Firstly, good job patrolling this article - it's a topic prone to opinion, he addition of unnotable artists and outright personal research. It will probably always take a bit of time and effort to maintain. The large block of text/rant being added by the IP editor has also been copied to other Wikipedia articles and posted on several other web sites and forums. I don't believe he/she is interested in merging their material into Wiki articles in a useful manner; rather they're publishing their personal manifesto to as wide an audience as possible. The best we can probably do is what's already being done - that is, watching for and reverting the addition of 'the rant', protecting articles that are the particular subject of his/her attention (although doing so blocks millions of potential useful editors from contributing) and ultimately removing their editing rights by the use of an IP block if they become an irredeemable pest.
- I'll keep an eye on the article (and editor) for now and re-protect if your attempts to communicate lead nowhere. Cheers. - TB (talk) 08:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)