Archives |
---|
Threads older than 120 days may be archived by MiszaBot II. |
Contents
AAlertBot down since April 14
As you can see, AAlertbot hasn't run since 04:39, 14 April 2015 (Eastern U.S.). Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 05:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'll give it a kick tonight when I get home. I could have sworn it ran over the week end, but I guess it didn't. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
AAlertBot hasn't run for 4 days
Last ran at 08:11, 18 May 2015 UTC. Nurg (talk) 07:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Right you are. I'll get on it. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Pure workflow lists? (not broken out by WikiProject)
I was wondering if a feature could be added to Article Alerts Bot generated lists? Adding a general listing of all events qualifying under each workflow as a subpage here, for each workflow. such as WP:Article alerts/list/Requested moves will list everything that the bot detects as a move request and list them in the bot generated manner. (and the same for WP:Article alerts/list/Proposed deletions, WP:Article alerts/list/Articles for deletion, etc) -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 05:47, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That might not be a bad idea, though these pages will be HUGE in some cases. Also, the bot ignores pages not belonging to any projects, so it will be missing entries. The subscription-to-page logic is very much tied together atm. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Boldface missing
Hasn't run for WP Louisville since July 17
FYI... Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisville alerts haven't been updated since July 17. Rooster Run is shown as being deprod'd, but has since gone through an AfD which was closed. Thanks for looking into this. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:57, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- The AfD was opened and closed on the same day faster than the bot had a chance to see it. Closed entries can only happen if there ever was an open entry, which there wasn't for this page. "Closed" simply means it was detected active, but is no longer. The page is in no maintenance category, it is not flagged for AfD, etc. So the bot has no reason to visit it over any other.
- This is an uncommon edge case. Usually even speedy closes are at least a day old. There's currently no easy or reliable way to detect these super-fast workflow entries. And it would drastically change how things like dates are detected. I would need separate logic for these. For example, parsing AfD log or something. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for the explanation. I was actually more concerned that maybe other items weren't being caught in the interim period. It all makes sense now. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 12:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)