Skip to the bottom ⇩ · It is 12:33 PM where this user lives in Alberta. (Purge)
Talk page archive |
Send me no flowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
Thank you
Hi Diannaa, Thought I'd drop off a little snack and say thanks for commenting out use(s) of file "File:New York Academy of Sciences logo.gif": non-free file in userspace. --Rosiestep (talk) 14:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, glad to help -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
This page, which you deleted yesterday, has been re-created. The user has previously received advice on his talk page. Eagleash (talk) 13:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The page is kinda borderline. He's shown no interest in actually editing the encyclopedia, only in posting an autobiography. I have removed the link to his website, let's see what happens next. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Olfactory Art
Hi Diannaa,
You deleted my Draft:Olfactory Art for "Unambiguous copyright infringement of"
https://www.academia.edu/4608919/Historical_Overview_of_Olfactory_Art_in_the_20th_Century
Perhaps it wasn't clear, but that is my paper. I spoke to another admin (+Stabila711) on wikipedia-en-help who explained that since I had it posted on Academia.edu, they have copyright over it. I could take it down from Academia and retry. But could you restore a copy of the draft I submitted yesterday? Because I spent hours reformatting it and I'm not so good at Wiki; this is my first time writing an article on Wikipedia. I'm offering my own research and expertise as a basis for a non-existent but much needed Wikipedia article...
I look forward to hearing from you.
@
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Archmemory (talk • contribs) 12:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Archmemory. Taking the paper down from Academia.edu would not make any difference at this point. Since the paper has previously been published elsewhere online, we can't take your word for it that you are the copyright holder. We do this for the protection of copyright holders. If you wish to release the material to Wikipedia under license, you need to get an OTRS ticket in place. Please see WP:donating copyrighted materials for how this is done. There's a sample permission email at WP:consent. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the links. As recommended in the Granting us permission to copy material already online section of your first link, I put the suggested text of the permission explicitly on the site where my material is posted (at the end of the Abstract section under INFO>more). Could you please restore a copy of that draft you deleted to my sandbox? -- Archmemory (talk) 18:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- I can't see a section marked INFO>more. Perhaps it is only available to logged in users? -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hmm... Yes, it seems so. Here's a screenshot of it. Should I put it in the PDF itself? That'll be visible to everyone. -- Archmemory (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Putting it in the PDF only works if it's in the copy that is publicly displayed without logging in. I can't download the PDF, as I cannot log in. I am going to the gym now, and will check back here when I return. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I added it to the PDF, and now it's visible without being logged in. Could you please restore the deleted draft? Thanks. -- Archmemory (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Archmemory. Thank you for taking the time to do that. Sorry it's all so complicated. I have restored the draft and have taken the liberty of fixing some of the style and mark-up issues. I hope you decide to stick around and help build the encyclopedia. Best, -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Diannaa! Yes, it was a challenge the first time, but now I know better how it's done. It obviously still needs work (I have yet to figure out the images), but at least it's a good solid start. It was a glaring omission on Wikipedia so far in terms of art... Best, @ Archmemory (talk) 23:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Wiki is hard. It is known. There's a set of helpful links at the top of your talk page that you might find useful. Also, consider visiting WP:teahouse for advice from people experienced in assisting new users. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw that, thanks. But frankly, with this rocky beginning, I'm reluctant to put any more effort into this. Just this morning, despite your note clarifying that "This submission has now been cleaned of the above-noted copyright violation..." a tag was placed on the draft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This system certainly doesn't make it easy for scholars to offer their research and expertise to quality articles; I seem to be caught in a vicious cycle of bureaucracy and absurdity... Archmemory (talk) 10:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- I do apologise for that on behalf of User:FoCuSandLeArN, who added the tag. It was a mistake on their part. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Diana. Yes, someone at WP:teahouse let me know. I must say, though, Wikipedia is one tough neighborhood ;-) Best, @ Archmemory (talk) 14:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Archmemory, I did remove the tag as soon as I saw what had happened, and because of it the draft has not been deleted a second time. I'm sorry for the confusion. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Zebb Dempster, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The Cambridge News article is (just barely) to pass A7. Probably won't pass the GNG, so take to AfD if required. . You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. GedUK 13:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Removal of sandbox
I recently noticed you deleted my sandbox, which in many cases is weird. A sandbox is what it says on the tin. You make anything and no one can say that's wrong. Deleting my sandbox is not right and you shouldn't do that, as it is my work that you just deleted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Can up you lol (talk • contribs) 15:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- The sandbox was deleted under criterion WP:U5: U5. Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. In the future please store such material offline, or use a free webhosting service such as Wordpress. If you wish to pursue this further, please go to Wikipedia:Deletion review. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- But how did I use my sandbox for a web host, plus why does anyone need to read my sandbox anyway? It's like "if I delete there sandbox I would make them angry" because I am. Can up you lol (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:57, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Material you posted there was a collection of material unrelated to creating an encyclopedia. Therefore it should not be on this website. It's immaterial whether anyone reads it or not. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- But what will happen if I do "immaterial" content on my sandbox again? Will I get blocked for my sandbox being "immaterial"? Can up you lol (talk) 12:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:User pages gives the guideline for user pages. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for fixing User talk:Law and Order. I was not sure how to approach it so did the CSD and made a section asking for moveback.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 18:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Tagging it for deletion under U2 was not the right way to go, as user talk pages are not normally deleted. I only ran across it by chance when assessing broken redirects. Better to tag it {{Db-move|page to be moved|reason}}. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Yet Another CaptainHog Sock
This time it's User:RadioFanLMAO. Same edits to the same pages. I think semi-protection of the pages and a CU is needed. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Nope, you're wrong. Don't know who you're talking about. Trying to make some useful edits without trying to start a fight. Bye! :) RadioFanLMAO (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, definite DUCK. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nope, No definite duck here. You can't prove it otherwise. Please stop. RadioFanLMAO (talk) 00:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Ohnoitsjamie blocked the sock, MikeV is running a CU to get rid of any sleepers. Page protection is probably still needed, though. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- ...and Ohnoitsjamie just semi-protected the pages. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- It's reassuring to know that I can go out for an hour, and stuff still gets done. :) -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Isn't though? :) MikeV said that HDRadioGuy2100 and RadioFanLMAO are "technically very likely" to be one-in-the-same based on the CU. With the pages protected, and no sleepers, hopefully this guy will go away. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- It's pointless to keep returnin, since all his edits get reverted. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, but some people just never seem to understand "you're blocked, now go away" for some reason. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Why did you delete Stimulation of nipples? It certainly didn't qualify under WP:CSD#R3. It wasn't a redirect, unless a vandal moved it recently. 107.10.236.42 (talk) 04:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- It was a mistake. I have restored it. Thanks for noticing, I appreciate it. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for restoring it. 107.10.236.42 (talk) 04:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Recover Shoalhaven wine
Can you please assist me in recovering the infobox details for the page Shoalhaven wine. I will work on contributing a revised page without the copyright infringements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karwalski (talk • contribs) 08:57, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Karwalski. I've placed what I could in a sandbox for you, User:Karwalski/sandbox. Best, -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
I think you could use one of these :-)
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
To Diannaa. I wanted to thank you for your hard work deleting the redirects that resulted in the ANI thread. The discussion has blown up with discussions, emotions, and actions - it should be recognized that what you're doing is hard work. I appreciate it, and I thank you. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 09:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC) |
Thank you, Oshwah! -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Deletion.
Why did you delete a page even though it had been contested? Do you realise that you must wait for the discussion to come to a close before deleting an article? --Bulb-und-Büld (talk) 21:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy deletions do not require discussion or consensus. The article qualifies as A7 regardless, and I mentioned that as a second deletion rationale. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyedits request
Totally Out of Control. Very short article. Whenever you have the time, I'd really appreciate it. Peace, Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 23:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, for a minute there I thought you were commenting on my behaviour -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hah :) But your copyedits might not even be needed since a deletion discussion is taking place. I'll do my best to prevent it being deleted and let you know the result. Stay tuned! Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 00:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Minor copy edit complete. Your English is improving all the time. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. :) I'm actually thinking about translating Tips og råd til bedre Engelsk, an easy helping page for non-native speakers, into German and English. My best friends gymnasium seems to be pretty found of it. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 00:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks for the redirect deletions
I started to look at deleting some of the Neelix redirects, only to discover that most of the worst of them had already gone. I just discovered that you had done much of the hard work. Thanks. -- The Anome (talk) 23:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, the worst of them were done by user:Drmies and myself on
Friday Thursday night. Thanks for the recognition. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Great fun. Drmies (talk) 01:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the copyvio fixes, and the block. Another editor with a similarly generic female name - Special:Contributions/Jenna_Malkovich - has now added the text right back in; and I've been asked whether, given a high degree of overlap, this seems like the same person. To me, yes - though this second account predates your block (and I have not otherwise undertaken to correlate, e.g., times of edits, or yet examined her edits for other violations). I'll report whatever further I learn (as well as re-insertion of the copyvio material) and am alerting you to this in case there's anything else you'd like to do in the meantime. JohnInDC (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Also see her edit to Audi Marissa. JohnInDC (talk) 18:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- I came here to say the same thing, plus, see also User talk:139.192.40.108 -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, that's got it done for now :/ Thank you for reporting. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, Diannaa! I hadn't clicked that in the event you'd done the honours for Joanna rather than JohninDC, so I took this to his page rather than bringing it straight here as perhaps I should have. Anyway, do you, either of you, think it's worth opening an SPI request and asking for check-user here? I have a success rate almost indistinguishable from 0% with such requests, but don't mind trying again if it's needed. Regards (and more thanks for the revdeletions!) Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yes please, if you could go ahead with that I would appreciate it. User:Jake Bayu has 8 articles in common with Joanna_Gunadi and two with Jenna_Malkovich. So I wonder. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I did that as best I could (as you presumably know, as I pinged you – or was there something about pings not working from that page?); on past form, I expect it to be declined. I looked at Jake Bayu: his edits seem to be mostly to with awards, and I didn't immediately see any obviously suspect edits; if you did, please go ahead and add him. I'm more worried about the IPs (I haven't researched them, but I don't like this edit or this one, for example), and I imagine that check-users will decline to help with them. How do those usually get handled? A subpage with a list of suspect IPs? Add them to the CCI on suspicion alone? Ask an admin who understands ranges (you?) to identify the likely ones? I know I don't know! Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 02:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting that started. The ping did not work, probably because the page is auto-signed for you. 139.192.40.108 and 139.192.40.92 are on the same range, but 139.195.169.225 is not. Editing whilst logged out is permitted, not considered socking unless it's done with ill intent, so there's not much point adding them to the SPI I don't think. If a check-user does a sweep, Jake Bayu will be found if it is editing from the same or similar IPs. If you have any particular IPs or accounts that you think should be added to the CCI, that can be done. Just ask MER-C or Moonriddengirl and they can create the material to add to the case page. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Jenna Malkovich is a confirmed sock, and needs to be added to the CCI. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Special:Contributions/111.94.14.117, geolocating to Jakarta, has been editing several articles previously edited by the master & puppet, and
today yesterday added copyrighted material to 2015 Nickelodeon Indonesia Kids' Choice Awards. I am happy to file an SPI, but am noting it here first in case you'd like to act directly. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 16:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Blocked for a week. Thanks John for keeping an eye on this. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Page I edited was deleted
Hi Diannaa I'm not sure why you deleted the page IKeyMonitor i just created, You found it promotional would you care to explain to me how it is I will certainly improve upon it and make the required changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Socialmux (talk • contribs) 15:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The page was deleted as G4: recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion. The prior deletion discussion can be found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IKeyMonitor. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
I wonder why do you guys think it's still promotional there are many others article like this. "the large table of features can be merged into the intro stub paragraph" is already done. And it's a good app and I have used it and tried to everything available in reliable sources. Yahoo-tech is a relible source. unsigned comment added by Socialmux (talk •
- Nothing has changed since the article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion in July. The source at Yahoo is a press release, not independent coverage. The app is not notable enough for an article at this time. Sorry, -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa,
This editor has been trying to refine their article through the irc help channel, agree the article appears promotional but they were seeking to improve the article and I believe with further assistance they would be able to reduce its promotional nature (no guarantee it will meet criteria for inclusion but that's a separate issue). Would you be amenable to unblocking subject to a user-name change to something less promotional and a declaration of COI/Paid editing on their user/talk page. Amortias (T)(C) 21:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- The user needs to post an unblock request on their user talk page in the usual way. I will add the "three questions" so they are clear what our requirements are. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- That's fine I'll instruct them as such. Amortias (T)(C) 22:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For your tireless and accurate removal of copyright violations in so many places I have lost count Fiddle Faddle 22:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks Tim! -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- We notice, you know. We notice. Fiddle Faddle 22:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
88.106.226.6
Hello, The IP editor that you blocked for 2 weeks after persistent disruption to F1 articles has returned in the last few days here today, here on Friday 6 November, and here on Saturday. He has been starting articles and templates in talk-pages again and a lot of edits have had to be corrected by others again. There is also a template for deletion notice on one of his creations Template:Chris Amon Racing which he has now deleted three times. He's also interfered with the discussion at the templates for discussion board by deleting the section. Our previous discussion is in your archive here. He was warned on his (today's) talk-page not to delete the template again, but he blanked the page and deleted the t/plate again. Can you help please? Thanks. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 20:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- The prior range was 92.21.240.0/20 but I am going to narrow that to 92.21.240.0/21, as someone else is using the range. We can block 88.106.224.0/20 with minimal collateral damage. I will block for 2 weeks. I have also semi-protected Template:Chris Amon Racing for a week so the TFD can run uneventfully. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you!! I don't know how this going to run out in the long run. Eagleash (talk) 20:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- These ranges in the UK are busy, else I might do longer blocks. I left a message at the IP talk page, which hopefully he reads before his IP once again switches. User talk:88.106.226.6. We've had some successes in the past with a combination of protection and range blocks with other persistent vandals/disruptive editors. We shall see. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- It's been suggested that he open account several times (I did so on Saturday) but to no avail. Some of his stuff is pretty good but he also does a lot wrong and won't either engage or take much notice of what's said to him. Eagleash (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Bollywoodhungama.com
Lots of images from Bollywoodhungama are uploaded in Wikipedia as free images. How can i find out which wesbite's pics can be uploaded in Wikipedia as free images? There are all these copyright rules.
commons:File:Shruti Haasan grace the Carzonrent-Gabbar Is Back Meet & Greet,2015.jpg
commons:File:Nargis Fakhri walks for Ritu Kumar at LFW 2013 (3) (cropped 2).jpg
--Galaxy Kid (talk) 04:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Galaxy Kid. Almost all photos that you find online are copyright. Please don't copy images from other websites and upload them here. You could get into trouble if you do. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- But why Bollywoodhungama pictures are allowed in Wikipedia? These pictures are not like movie posters.Galaxy Kid (talk) 04:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- That particular website has chosen to release their photos under license. --Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 05:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Okay, when i visit the source page of those image as this, i can only see the watermark (Bollywoodhungama logo) on the image. So, if any other website pictures have watermark of their website logo on the image; that image is released under license, or we have to request them for their permission? Galaxy Kid (talk) 05:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) According to the documentation at c:Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama, “photos copyrighted by other sites” are specifically mentioned as not covered by the BH licence, so I would say yes, you would have to get permission from the owner. (Remember that this must allow anyone to use the image for any purpose, not just for WP.)—Odysseus1479 05:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Hard Worker's Barnstar |
Thank you very much for taking care of the many revdel requests I have been submitting over the past few days. I imagine it is thankless work but I very much appreciate it! Cheers from Eastern Canada. /wia /tlk 15:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks! -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Phillip Bonosky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Onel5969 TT me 16:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Notability of organization help - feliciakw - the people's alliance
Hi Dianaa!! You made some changes to my original article which I really appreciated. I resubmitted it and "LaMona" rejected it because she felt the group was not 'notable'. I am sure that everyone who gets rejected has reasons why they feel their topic is notable, why else would you spend the time creating a page? If my page is going to ultimately be rejected because it is not notable - I need to change course fast. I am asking for your advice on how to proceed.
I am taking a class at NCCU in Durham called "Writing for Social Change". Our first project was to create or add to a Wiki page relevant to the social and political activism in our community. Durham, NC has a population of 250,000. The Research Triangle is anchored by Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill and has a combined population of 1M and is home to Duke and UNC as well as a dozen other colleges. We are a notably sized community.
I originally wanted to create a page on the Crest Street neighborhood. It is of great significance socially and politically as well as of great civil rights importance. In the mid-1970s, the NCDOT, USDOT and FHWA planned to obliterate another historically significant African American neighborhood in Durham with the Durham Freeway 147 extension (Hayti was the first). The community rallied and the government moved the neighborhood out of the way of the freeway at a cost of $10M. They are the only neighborhood moved to date, anywhere in the US, that the GOVERNMENT paid the entire cost. It's a big deal.
It was (is) too big a topic for the time I had available. The research made me aware of how much justice the People's Alliance has won in the last 40 years. They first came together as a group as part of the steering committee that worked with Crest Street. The members worked with the community to help align parties together - the Crest Street Council - the church - legal aid - the city and county - traffic engineers - environmental groups...the list goes on. So I decided to do their page.
Below is my supporting data. I'm All of my sources are valid. I hope you will find the PA notable. I really don't want to flunk my project.
Thank you kindly!!! -felicia
Extended content |
- One of the largest progressive organizations in Durham, the Durham Chapter of the People’s Alliance is an influential voice in local politics and culture. here
- Official group on Facebook here
- Respected and active Durham blog (I understand blogs are not accepted as sources, which is why I did not use it...) However, it supports importance of the PA activism in Durham.) here
- Current and notable social justice campaign here
- Current and notable social justice campaign here
- Recent references in the Durham Herald Sun here
- Recent references in the Indy Week magazine here
- Crest Street (1975): Page 7 details The People's Alliance as members of the Steering Committee that set the overall committee structure, approved the initial plan of action, monitored study and provided oversight of relocation planning process.
- Title VI Administrative Complaint, Mitigation and Enhancement Plan, Housing of Last Resort, Collaborative Planning, East-West Expressway Environmental Impact Study NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF DURHAM CREST STREET COMMUNITY COUNCIL. here
- Federal Highway Administration Case study regarding the Crest Street Relocation here
- Page 8 details the involvement of the PA here
- Page 6 details the PA involvement in Crest Street, Crest Street Community Negotiations here
- Case history: Use of Last Resort Housing Benefits and Redevelopment Powers to Preserve a Low-Income Community Threatened With Displacement: A Case History (with M. Calhoun), 22 CLEARINGHOUSE REV. 442 (1988).
- Page 59 details the PA involvement in Crest Street, The Politics of Relocation: The Moving of the Crest Street Community. DOI: 10.1080/01944369108975472
- Page 43 details the PA involvement in Crest Street, Neighborhood Groups vs. Business Developers in Durham: Expressway Politics in the Scarce Energy Age here
- Page 257 details the PA involvement in Crest Street, Activists and Asphalt: A Successful Anti-expressway Movement in a "New South City", Paul Luebke (1981) Activists and Asphalt: A Successful Anti-expressway Movement in a "New South City". Human Organization: Fall 1981, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 256-263. doi: here
- Paragraph 7 details Mike Calhoun, legal aid attorney for Crest Street Negotiations here
- United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit here
- United States Supreme Court decision regarding the payment of legal fees to attorneys in Crest Street Relocation here, here
- Duke University recognizes importance of Crest Street Negotiator, here
- The PA website identifies and supports involvement with parties involved in Crest Street here
|
Feliciakw (talk) 01:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Feliciakw. The thing that establishes notability (as Wikipedia defines it) is in-depth coverage in multiple sources that are independent of the subject of the article. What you need to do is incorporate any of these that meet that criterion as citations in your draft. Then re-submit for publication. Good luck, -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Thank you for cleanning up my sandbox! I appreciate you! jdxzhu 01:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC) |
File deletion: Private Industry Rehabilitation Headquarters Ontario, CA.jpg
Diannaa Dear Diana, a copyright for this image has been granted by the author, but the images was deleted nevertheless. I am confused.--Kalina3112 (talk) 10:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Kalina3112. File:WAATMEpicAddictionCanadaOFFICIAL.jpg. The file showed that only non-commercial use of the image is permitted, which is not a liberal enough license for the photo to be uploaded here. Sorry, -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
|