The best road to progress is freedom's road. - JFK
Texas
Please read before requesting arbitration
A request for arbitration is the last step of dispute resolution on Wikipedia. The Arbitration Committee considers requests to open new cases and review previous decisions. The entire process is governed by the arbitration policy. For information about requesting arbitration, and how cases are accepted and dealt with, please see guide to arbitration.
Arbitration
The Arbitration Committee of the English Wikipedia has the following duties and responsibilities:
To act as a final binding decision-maker primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve;
To hear appeals from blocked, banned, or otherwise restricted users;
To handle requests (other than self-requests) for removal of administrative tools;
To resolve matters unsuitable for public discussion for privacy, legal, or similar reasons;
To approve and remove access to (i) CheckUser and Oversight tools and (ii) mailing lists maintained by the Arbitration Committee.
Please make your request in the appropriate section:
Arbitrator-initiated motions, not specific to a current open request
Dispute resolution requests (WP:DRR) provides a central compilation of and an easy-access overview for Wikipedia:Dispute resolution's (WP:DR), and details the various different methods used at each of the Wikipedia dispute resolution pages.
Place to file an investigation to find out whether two or more Wikipedia accounts are being abusively operated by the same person.
Noticeboard for reporting users who are actively edit warring and/or have violated the three-revert rule.
Request assistance from administrators and experienced users on the English Wikipedia regarding recent or ongoing misconduct by a fellow user.
Arbitration and Arbitration Enforcement
Apply to the Arbitration Committee for an examination and binding decision regarding a long standing issue of mis-conduct after all other avenues of dispute resolution have been exhausted. Or request enforcement against a user who you feel is acting in breach of the remedies described in a closed arbitration case.