![]() Archives |
---|
Contents
Photo of Leonie Kramer
Disclaimer says that site material may be used for limited use, not commercial. Are there any loopholes to this? --George Ho (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Seems like a regular disclaimer from educational institution's websites. No commercial usage, no non-educational usage. Hence uploaded the image locally on en wp with disclaimer. Didnt get any free image on web to upload on Commons. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Your user page
Your WikiHates section only promotes hate. It is my advice that you remove it. People often keep funny vandalized diffs but this is a collection of diffs where people express their hatred towards you. You could do well and remove it. --QEDK (T ☕ C) 15:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
-
- I had read this before and ignored it. I guess that was clear enough to state that i do not intend to remove it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Generally the people I post to care enough to reply, whatever their response. It was my fault that I expected it from you too. Feel free to re-archive this. --QEDK (T ☕ C) 18:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- I see no persuasive reason to remove it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- And I'm not here to convince you. --QEDK (T ☕ C) 09:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Good! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- And I'm not here to convince you. --QEDK (T ☕ C) 09:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- I see no persuasive reason to remove it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Generally the people I post to care enough to reply, whatever their response. It was my fault that I expected it from you too. Feel free to re-archive this. --QEDK (T ☕ C) 18:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- I had read this before and ignored it. I guess that was clear enough to state that i do not intend to remove it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Leonie Kramer.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leonie Kramer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Provocation
Dharmadhyaksha, I'm still keeping an eye on the Kashibai article, following the ANI thread a few days ago. It looks like Krish! is holding his tongue. You, however, are not. My comment on the ANI thread about civility applies to you too, comments such as calling the editor a "fanboy", or "You need to complete your studies. For our sake. You were not pinged in that message because i knew it would not be easy for you to comprehend it. LOL. will get you blocked. Stop it. WormTT(talk) 13:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Worm That Turned: He is a self-claimed fan of PC. That’s one difference for evidence and there are plenty on talk pages of his and other people here and there. I don't think he should selectively take "fanboy" as offensive at times and on other times boast about it on his pages.
At ANI you stated that Krish has stopped his behaviour after your note on 1st May. These things "I'm sure you have a movie of Kashibai from that era on your Laptop and you surely know how she acted, walked and talked with her family. Kindly tell us." and "This is no way neutral and adding the neagtives and removing positives? What an Idea? LOL." and "Do one favour, why don't you show the worls, the video you have of Kashibai' walking, talking and working from that era? You have right? Because you are beahaving the way like you have seen her and she didnt look anything like the film's character. LOL this is so funny, just because you think her personality would be different from the film, you are stretching this discussion?" are post your note and are not civil or non-provocative in any nature.
Just because I can't boast of GAs/FAs/FLs or make hysterical dramas with bold block letters I should not be prone to PAs. I am least interested in this fellow and promise to stay away from all articles he has ever edited even if the articles are wrong in whatsoever matter. I have been discussing IBAN with SpacemanSpiff but he and RegentsPark don't think it effectively works. Well... the Wiki imposed one might not work, but my self-imposed one surely would. Tell other editors also to follow the suit who have no better experience of this fellow. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)- "Fan" and "fanboy" are very different words Dharmadhyaksha. The latter has many connotations and is considered derogatory, perhaps have a look at Wikipedia's article to see what I mean - Fan_(person)#Fanboy. He moved from commenting on the contributor to commenting on the argument, which is at a core of our civility policy. Provocative, maybe, but there was always going to be a disagreement. You need to ensure that you're not commenting on the contributor, as you were in diffs I highlighted.
Now, I don't disagree with the idea of an interaction ban. They're not great, for the reasons mentioned there, but if you're actively trying to remove yourself from the argument, I'd be happy to help you with that. If he's not letting you move away, let me know. WormTT(talk) 10:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)- Thanks for offering help. But if I have decided to stay away I don't think anyone can force me to not do it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- "Fan" and "fanboy" are very different words Dharmadhyaksha. The latter has many connotations and is considered derogatory, perhaps have a look at Wikipedia's article to see what I mean - Fan_(person)#Fanboy. He moved from commenting on the contributor to commenting on the argument, which is at a core of our civility policy. Provocative, maybe, but there was always going to be a disagreement. You need to ensure that you're not commenting on the contributor, as you were in diffs I highlighted.
WikiCup 2016 May newsletter
Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.
Round 2 saw three FAs (two by Cas Liber (submissions) and one by
Montanabw (submissions)), four Featured Lists (with three by
Calvin999 (submissions)), and 53 Good Articles (six by
Worm That Turned (submissions) and five each by
Hurricanehink (submissions),
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), and
MPJ-DK (submissions)). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by
Adam Cuerden (submissions) and five by
Godot13 (submissions)). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) scored 265 base points, while
The C of E (submissions) and
MPJ-DK (submissions) each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with
MPJ-DK (submissions) completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants,
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and
Cas Liber (submissions), broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.
If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)