|
![]() Archives |
---|
![]() |
---|
14 April 2016 |
|
Contents
- 1 your deletion of Dada Nada Page
- 2 Bandar bin Abdulaziz Al Saud
- 3 Praxisphere
- 4 Tagging of Drogo of Nesle
- 5 Page has been Deleted
- 6 Speedy deletion nomination of 'Radіo Lem.fm
- 7 A barnstar for you!
- 8 Sigurður Guðmundsson
- 9 Answer
- 10 That Spanish-speaking company is actually remarkable, it's just promotional
your deletion of Dada Nada Page
looks like you prob did this via "quick deletion" - i truly wish you'd not done that and would've given others an opportunity to respond to the possible deletion.
It was not a new page as it's been there for many, many years.
the reason you gave was that it was redundant as it was in a page about recording artist/screenwriter/film producer/actor Robert Ozn
While DaDa Nada is one of Robert Ozn's acts, it is entirely separate and also an act that is by far the most recent, particularly as it relates to a a very important pro-peace, anti-terrorism music release he's about to make in 2016, which was also the subject of an indiegogo campaign.
i'm a huge supporter/fan and want to see that it as easy as possible for journalists to get information about DaDa NaDa. Once that release occurs there will be searches for DaDa NaDa and it's now going to be confusing because they very likely will not know that that name has a relationship to Mr. Ozn.
There have been times in his career that he only uses that moniker without any reference to any other identity.
I truly appreciate how you care about Wikipedia, but this deletion from my point of view was a bit overzealous in the fact that you didn't give anyone time to respond.
I passionately disagree with it and would really appreciate it if you or whoever followed you would restore it.
Thank you, MusicalTheatreBuff — Preceding unsigned comment added by MusicalTheatreBuff (talk • contribs) 22:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- @MusicalTheatreBuff:
- Procedure: As noted above, I am not an administrator and do not have the power to delete articles. I had proposed it for deletion for reasons I listed on your talk page--once tagged as such, anyone can object to the deletion by simply removing the tag. The article was deleted by an administrator after one week with no objections. This process is distinct from the speedy deletion process whereby an article meeting certain criteria can be deleted immediately.
- Content: Nothing in the article was backed up by any sources whatsoever, and I found nothing about Dada Nada to indicate that it merited a separate article. As it is really just a solo vehicle for Ozn, anything about it can and should be covered under his article. Perhaps Dada Nada could be turned into a redirect to the Ozn article, but nothing more.
- To be fair, I will request its undeletion in the appropriate forum, but then I plan to put it forth for discussion via the more formal articles for deletion process, where the community at large will have an opportunity to comment. You will also have time to improve it if you can, but I stand by my assessment of the article in the state it was in at the time I tagged it. --Finngall talk 23:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- (PS: I had just purchased "Feeling Cavalier" on iTunes shortly before tagging the article, so it's not like I'm not a fan, but I'm trying to be objective here...)
- @MusicalTheatreBuff: Article is now up for discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dada Nada. --Finngall talk 00:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Bandar bin Abdulaziz Al Saud
Hello Finngall. Would you please use the discussion page of the article and explain what makes you sure that it was Bandar bin Saud who died. Regards --Dangermouse600 (talk) 20:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Dangermouse600: Ummmm, because every cited source named Bandar bin Saud as the prince who died? It looks like some of the sources themselves got confused about the relationships, but the name was consistent. --Finngall talk 20:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Praxisphere
Sorry about that, I had the page open while I was doing a google search looking for copyvios or evidence of the term's existence, and I'd opened it before you did the Prod so I didn't see it when I placed the speedy. I speedied it as a hoax because it appears to be entirely his creation, the person he said created it doesn't appear to have done so. Apologies for the confusion. JamesG5 (talk) 02:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- @JamesG5: Yeah, it's totally non-notable self-promotional (insert your favorite perjorative noun here), but now that Dr. Trevino has removed the prod tag, it'll be a matter for AfD momentarily. --Finngall talk 02:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Tagging of Drogo of Nesle
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Drogo of Nesle. I do not think that Drogo of Nesle fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because The mention of the first crusade, and of Emicho give ample context. I request that you consider not re-tagging Drogo of Nesle for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. Before tagging for "no context" a Wikipedia search and a web search on terms mentioned in the article is strongly advised. DES (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Page has been Deleted
Hi Finngall,
I have created a page for Our Startup company and no way it is related for Promotion. Please suggest what changes are required if i want my page to be created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kishore.Gurram (talk • contribs) 06:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Kishore.Gurram:
- Startup companies are not generally considered notable enough to merit an article in Wikipedia.
- "Telling the world about our company and its services" is the very definition of advertising, which is not allowed on Wikipedia.
- It's not your article--even if an article were allowed to be created, you would not be allowed to have control over it.
- Regardless of any of the above, we STRONGLY discourage editors from creating articles on subjects with which they have a close connection.
- If you want there to be a Wikipedia article about your company, then stop worrying about Wikipedia and build the company to the point where someone else might consider writing about it. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia which covers subjects that are already notable. It is not a free web host for companies which seek to become notable. Please read the pages on Wikipedia's policies which I have linked to above. You are more than welcome to edit articles on other subjects, but PLEASE do not attempt to recreate an article on Instasafe again. Thank you for your time. --Finngall talk 14:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 'Radіo Lem.fm
Hi Finngall!
Yhis is not my original article but trabslation from the original text rue:Радіо_Лем.фм
It article aboout about ONLY Radio in Lemkos language around all world. Today it seems impossible find more medii for such very small people,with it's original culture , folclore etc...
Golodg (talk) 00:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC).
- @Golodg: Please read the general notability guidelines for Wikipedia. Without significant coverage in reliable sources, it doesn't matter how unique it is. --Finngall talk 00:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
Congratulations! Javier José Moreno Tovar18 (talk) 23:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC) |
Sigurður Guðmundsson
I took the speedy off of Sigurður Guðmundsson, you might want to have checked what links here first as well as the fact the guy does have some foreign wikis. Though I might of done the same as you! But it does look like he is notable and apparently was on a Icelandic stamp! Wgolf (talk) 00:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Wgolf: When all the article says is "he exists and someone thinks he's a great guy" with that referenced "someone" being his publisher, I don't think "decorated author", I think "borderline spam" (shrug). --Finngall talk 01:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Answer
This point. In fact, I've just removed the section you dab'd. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
That Spanish-speaking company is actually remarkable, it's just promotional
I did a quick Google and several reliable sources showed up (I don't read Spanish-language media but at least I know Univision, which reported the company). If the ad tone could be edited out, and article translated into English, the article could stay. Ueutyi (talk) 23:00, 15 April 2016 (UTC)