A note |
---|
Hello, and welcome to my talk page. If you've come here to complain, by all means do so but please Assume good faith. Saying,
Is not nearly as nice as saying, Yet they get the same message accross. |
My Talk Archives |
|||
---|---|---|---|
|
Contents |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Goalkeeper (water polo)
Hi. Sorry for not responding earlier. I was away. In regards to Goalkeeper (water polo), which A-Class assessment process were you going to go through? I'd need to see the criteria before evaluating for the specific project. As far as I know, there are no A-Class assessments open to swimming and sport in general. --LauraHale (talk) 18:59, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you...
... for the barnstar. :) Means a lot. :) --LauraHale (talk) 20:56, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Guinotia dentata
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:29, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
You can at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks about your comment the Metz article featuring Process. I appreciated your attention. Best regards.
GA reviews
Hi JZCL,
Sorry to bother you, as I appreciate that you may be busy. I noticed via an article that you do GA reviews, and was wondering if I may ask a few questions about the GA process, when you have time to spare of course. Much regards, Wesley☀Mouse 20:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- No problem at all - state the question and I'll do my best to answer it. If you want advice on reviewing GAs, look at WP:Reviewing good articles but please feel free to ask a question. JZCL 16:11, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for responding back to me. The question may be a bit of a strange one, but nevertheless I shall try and word it the best I can. I recently nominated Eurovision Song Contest 2012 for a GA review, which is still in progress, albeit taking weeks. But we've hit a bit of a stumbling block in regards to some content on the article itself. As the article is in regards to a contest, it also includes results etc. The overall results for the contest are determined by a 50/50 split of jury and televoting - which is mentioned in the article. Since 2009, the annual articles have included the combined results (as presented during the contest itself), and a split breakdown of individual jury and televote results (which also get published by the official website) to show how the combination was achieved. The GA reviewer has stated that the split breakdown results shouldn't be included, and could fail the GA. Yet, the consensus of members regarding these tables is hat they are vital to the article and explain how a result was achieved. So I was wondering if you'd be able to cast a second opinion, and then perhaps there would be something to put forward to the members of the Eurovision project to determine which direction would be the best way forward. Kindest regards in advance, Wesley☀Mouse 17:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)