Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blumenthal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomingdale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karlovy Vary, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Czech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bajer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Please read edits comments before revert
The content has already been moved to the relevant article. Yug (talk) 16:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rheinpfalz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Afroasiatic languages
Dear Metron, you've made some edits to Afroasiatic languages where you assert that Omotic is widely disputed. First, I want to point your attention to the fact that you did not provide a source for this claim, which would certainly be necessary to support the edits. Secondly, it is also not clear as to what exactly is disputed about Omotic. I know that there has been discussion about the internal integrity of the Omotic branch, such as the inclusion of the South Omotic languages. Others have asserted that Omotic is really just a branch of the Cushitic languages, and called it West Cushitic (this discussion came to an end in the late 1970s). I think only a minority of scholars ever doubted that the Omotic languages are part of the Afroasiatic phylum, and certainly the consensus among Chushiticists and Omotocicists is that Omotic languages do belong into the Afroasiatic phylum, however the micro-classification works out. With all this in mind, I kindly request that you provide sources to your claim, and that you clarify your claim. If you cannot do this, I instead request that you revert your edits regarding Omotic and restore the state of the page according to the previous consensus among the editors. Landroving Linguist (talk) 16:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)