Some editors feel that the use of the ESI score is unencyclopedic because it has no peer reviewed papers and is which has never been cited in any serious WP:MAINSTREAM literature. Relisted by Davidbuddy9 Talk 21:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
apparently, the article was titled "area of a disk" for a long time...was recently changed to "area of a circle" (the recent consensus is for this title) but was changed back to "area of a disk." See above talk section "move history" for this...policy arguments can be made for either title so I think it's going to come down to simple consensus/preference...
my vote: area of a circle (see earlier section for my reasoning, if interested) 68.48.241.158 (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
The lists of countries that use YouTube and of media encoding options are now collapsed. MOS:COLLAPSE normally discourages collapsing the tables. The question is not to either keep the tables collapsed or expand them. Actually, someone said that these tables are too long for an average reader. Shall we retain those tables or remove them? --Relisted.George Ho (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The crash article seems short enough to fit into another article. Shall we merge the private airplane crash incident into the biography of the Canadian politician? George Ho (talk) 09:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion on popular culture has highlighted a fervent but inchoate mix of ideas among editors as to the status of EHS, a mess which is preventing progress in that discussion. The present RfC is aimed at clearing this up. The issue may also be complicated by the fact that claimed sufferers of EHS fall into two groups, those who have misdiagnosed some real symptom caused by something else and those who have worried themselves into developing adverse symptoms via the nocebo effect. I would ask for comments on two issues:
Is EHS a medical topic? Note that it is generally accepted classed as an alternative diagnosis, i.e. the condition has no medical recognition.
Is EHS pseudoscience? Note that several other alternative diagnoses based on unsound ideas such as Leaky gut syndrome, Drapetomania and Mucoid plaque are currently categorised as such.
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.