Failed "good article" nomination
Upon its review on May 27, 2019, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:
- contains cleanup banners including, but not limited to, {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}}, etc, or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar inline tags
thus making it ineligible for good article consideration.
This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.
What it is
When an article fails a good article review because it meets the criteria for immediate failure of having large numbers of cleanup banners, a "quick-fail" tag, abbreviated as a "QF-tag", may be placed on the talk page of the failed article.
How to use
{{subst:QF-tags}}— ~~~~
With optional closing comments:
{{subst:QF-tags|comments = <!-- OPTIONAL --> }}— ~~~~
When not to use
There is no specific rule against the existence of tags in a Good article. The tags may be invalid (e.g., added by someone who doesn't understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines) or may address issues not covered by the WP:Good article criteria (e.g., a request for an additional image). Do not use this template if the tags are invalid or irrelevant.
See also
- {{QF-unstable}} - for articles that are victims of edit wars, or discuss a future event
- {{QF-NPOV}} - for articles that lack neutrality
- {{QF-source}} - for articles with too few references