Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.
If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here. The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results. If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.
A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture. For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:.If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance. Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.
|
Featured picture tools: |
Step 1:
Evaluate Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations. |
Step 2:
Create a subpage
To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.
To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.
|
Step 3:
Transclude and link Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (). |
How to comment for Candidate Images
How to comment for Delist Images
Editing candidates
Is my monitor adjusted correctly?
|
- To see recent changes, .
FPCs needing feedback |
---|
Current nominations
Lidar scan of Folsom and Dore St, San Francisco
Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2019 at 05:41:36 (UTC)
- Reason
- This is a representation of a point cloud accumulated using an automotive lidar from a moving vehicle. This type of lidar may be used on autonomous cars, which is a popular topic recently. As a striking image that is the first and (so far) only example of this type of data on Wikimedia Commons, it provides encyclopaedic value for lidar, as well as articles on the algorithmic techniques of aligning such data (SLAM and point set registration).
- Articles in which this image appears
- Point set registration; lidar; Simultaneous localization and mapping
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
- Creator
- user:dllu
- Support as nominator – dllu (t,c) 05:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support - even though I'd much prefer a viewpoint from the car's position, but I realize that might be much more cluttered... I guess this was recorded at night - no people visible (unless that's a drunken person leaning against the light pole at 2 o'clock from center... ;-) --Janke | Talk 09:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – Visual information in this type of image is not readily accessible to the general reader/viewer, therefore it lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 15:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Geoffroi 08:22, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Roloway monkey
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2019 at 20:28:38 (UTC)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20191215230833im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Cercopithecus_roloway.jpg/347px-Cercopithecus_roloway.jpg)
- Reason
- Excellent photo of one of the most endangered primate species in the world
- Articles in which this image appears
- Roloway monkey, The World's 25 Most Endangered Primates, The world's 100 most threatened species
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Hans Hillewaert
- Support as nominator – Kaldari (talk) 20:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - a cluttered snapshot, not showing the animal to advantage. --Janke | Talk 12:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – Agree. More a 3/4 view and a tighter crop would show the subject to better advantage. – Sca (talk) 15:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Boulders Beach
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2019 at 12:04:48 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV & quality
- Articles in which this image appears
- Boulders Beach, Cape Town, African penguin, Simon's Town
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- kallerna
- Support as nominator —kallerna 12:04, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - As with the Faeroe sheep, there's a problem with the composition, since neither the penguins nor the location are the focal point. Less is more! --Janke | Talk 12:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment – leaning to support but it is only used in a gallery in Boulders Beach. (it has some EV in Simon's Town as well) Bammesk (talk) 14:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Sergeant John Geary, Thomas Onslow and Lance Corporal Patrick Carthay of the 95th (Derbyshire) Regiment of Foot
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2019 at 05:36:14 (UTC)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20191215230833im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e0/Jabez_Hughes_after_Cundall_%26_Howlett_-_Heroes_of_the_Crimean_War_-_Sergeant_John_Geary%2C_Thomas_Onslow_and_Lance_Corporal_Patrick_Carthay_of_the_95th_%28Derbyshire%29_Regiment_of_Foot.jpg/331px-thumbnail.jpg)
- Reason
- The best (and currently only) image of this now-extinct regiment, showing the regimental uniform clearly at the time of the Crimean War. Some nice examples of the famous Crimean beard
- Articles in which this image appears
- 95th (Derbyshire) Regiment of Foot
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military
- Creator
- Jabez Hughes after Cundall & Howlett; restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 05:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support, although it needs a little touch up right on the left edge close to the bottom. MER-C 10:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- @MER-C: Pretty sure I've got it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 22:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Geoffroi 17:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support after fix
Unnecessarily dark & murky. Easy to fix...--Janke | Talk 17:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC) - Comment – I agree with Janke. Bammesk (talk) 14:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
@MER-C, Geoffroi, Janke, and Bammesk: Tweaked it. Sorry, Christmas is getting at me. Let me know what you think; I don't want to lose it looking like a carbon print, because that's misleading, but I can readily tweak within that, and there was a lot of unused brightness levels on the right. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 07:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Il signor Tambourossini (redux)
Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2019 at 01:40:58 (UTC)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20191215230833im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/20/Il_signor_Tambourossini_-_Delaroche.jpg/295px-Il_signor_Tambourossini_-_Delaroche.jpg)
- Reason
- I'm not sure why this didn't pass the first time. Perhaps too much of the context was in a note at the bottom of the article. But this is an excellent example of a satirical cartoon that shows a negative view of someone who's now considered almost above reproach, challenging our modern view of his climb to fame. A prominent illustration in a featured article.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Gioachino Rossini
- FP category for this image
- WP:FP/THEATRE
- Creator
- Paul Delaroche, restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 01:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Geoffroi 04:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support as before. MER-C 18:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Because it's still funny 200 years later, definitely not true of all editorial cartoons. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:19, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Taewangkorea (talk) 22:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support - DreamSparrow Chat 08:16, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Gołuchów Castle
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2019 at 11:27:06 (UTC)
- Reason
- Articles in which this image appears
- Gołuchów Castle
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- User:P.R.Schreyner
- Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 11:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. There's a fair amount of noise in the flat surfaces (especially window panes) and the surrounding foliage is quite blurry. The article is short, but it also appears to indicate that this is not really a historic building any more, but rather merely a 19th-century mansion built in an earlier style on top of what used to be an old castle. Is there enough encyclopedic value here to make up for the faults in the image? (And if so, should we accept a caption that glosses over this history?) —David Eppstein (talk) 07:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – Substandard detail. Doubtful EV given the relative obscurity of the "castle," reconstructed in the 19th century. (Gołuchów was politically part of Prussia-cum-Germany in 1793-1918). – Sca (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per David and Sca. Geoffroi 20:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
NGC 1097 (2nd nomination)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2019 at 07:36:06 (UTC)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20191215230833im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/59/NGC1097_-_ESO_-_eso0438d.jpg/250px-NGC1097_-_ESO_-_eso0438d.jpg)
- Reason
- Received 4.5 support votes and 0 oppose votes in the previous attempt. Lede image in the NGC 1097 article.
- Articles in which this image appears
- NGC 1097, Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
- Creator
- European Southern Observatory
- Support as nominator – ↠Pine (✉) 07:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Question Are the galaxy's spiral arms slightly cut off? The one on the left seems to loop back into the shot. Nick-D (talk) 08:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Nick-D: I agree that a slightly wider crop would be better, but there are no other images in the Commons category at commons:Category:NGC 1097 that have a similar level of size and clarity and are nearly true color. I think that the closest alternative to this image in regards to quality is the decidedly "false" colored File:Coiled Galaxy.jpg. ↠Pine (✉) 08:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - Very fuzzy and noisy in full size, appears to be upsampled, also blown higlights in center. This mirror image (do we know which one is correct?) is much better: [[1]] - --Janke | Talk 22:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - needs a wider field of view. The "noise" is actually part of the galaxy (these areas have a low projected area density of stars) - the real noise characteristics of the image are seen on the bottom right. I don't think it is reasonable to observe this galaxy in whole without blowing out/saturating the center. MER-C 20:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose because (although showing only a much narrower field of view) File:NGC 1097 center Hubble.jpg shows how a much better image of the same subject is possible. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Nominations — to be closed
Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.
Older nominations requiring additional input from users
These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.
Closing procedure
A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Jujutacular/closeFPC
When NOT promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
- {{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- {{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
- If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing {{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}} on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.
When promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
- {{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
- Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
- Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- {{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
- Add the image to:
- Template:Announcements/New featured content - newest on top, remove the oldest so that 15 are listed at all times.
- Wikipedia:Goings-on - newest on bottom.
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs - newest on top.
- Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
- The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
- Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
- Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
- If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
- Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
- If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} to the top of the section.
- Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the December archive. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} from this page to the bottom of the archive.
- If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Delist closing procedure
Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.
If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:
- Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
- {{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- {{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
- Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.
If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
- {{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- {{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
- Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
- Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.
If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
- {{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
- {{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
- Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the delisted image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
- Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
- Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
- Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the top of the section.
- Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
- If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Recently closed nominations
Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.
Tilework in Jameh Mosque of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2019 at 11:15:19 (UTC)
- Reason
- HQ + Encyclopedic
- Articles in which this image appears
- Jameh Mosque of Isfahan - Tile
- FP category for this image
- Artwork/Others
- Creator
- Poco_a_poco
- Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 11:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Geoffroi 23:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support. --Gnosis (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - the top is fuzzy as though an overaggressive NR was performed, whereas the bottom is completely fine. MER-C 20:20, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per MER-C. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:50, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2019 at 09:59:26 (UTC)
- Reason
- We don't see many law-related pictures at FPC at all. This one's an FP on Commons. I've read the objections, and having been there myself can attest to the difficulty of getting this shot.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, United Kingdom constitutional law, Constitution of the United Kingdom, European Union law
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
- Creator
- Diliff
- Support as nominator – MER-C 09:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Geoffroi 23:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 04:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.3% of all FPs 00:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support. The commons complaints about perspective distortion don't bother me. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:48, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support - DreamSparrow Chat 17:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Promoted File:Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Court 1 Interior, London, UK - Diliff.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 10:54, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Adrian Horridge
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2019 at 23:11:47 (UTC)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20191215230833im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2a/Adrian_Horridge_FRS_on_his_90th_birthday.jpg/350px-Adrian_Horridge_FRS_on_his_90th_birthday.jpg)
- Reason
- Good EV and high quality
- Articles in which this image appears
- Adrian Horridge
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
- Creator
- Thennicke
- Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 23:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The pose of the subject is haphazard, and the background is busy and unattractive (the man sitting behind him, the hose, etc). Geoffroi 23:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – EV not apparent. – Sca (talk) 15:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's great that we have this picture, but it does not strike me as a professional-quality portrait. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:52, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 07:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Grey-faced Petrel
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2019 at 21:08:23 (UTC)
- Reason
- Good quality flight shot
- Articles in which this image appears
- Grey-faced Petrel
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- JJ Harrison
- Support as nominator – JJ Harrison (talk) 21:08, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Geoffroi 01:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 04:00, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - oversharped to the detriment of detail, noticeable halo on body and bottom wing. MER-C 12:04, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 21:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Hudsonian Godwit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2019 at 20:59:43 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV and quality. Quite rare for them to show up in Australia and easy the best image on commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Hudsonian godwit
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- JJ Harrison
- Support as nominator – JJ Harrison (talk) 20:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support Geoffroi 21:13, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Neutral - I'm suspecting the loss of detail on the body is due to preprocessing, please correct me if wrong. MER-C 12:06, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 21:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination didn't reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust The Homunculus 21:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Rabin Square
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2019 at 10:56:39 (UTC)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20191215230833im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c4/Rabin_Squre_eco_pool.jpg/392px-Rabin_Squre_eco_pool.jpg)
- Reason
- Good quality and high EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Rabin Square, Ibn Gabirol Street, Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv City Hall
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
- Creator
- Ron Henzel
- Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 10:56, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Andrei (talk) 00:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - uninspiring composition, no wow. MER-C 10:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per MER-C. Geoffroi 23:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - a simple snapshot, not Wikipedias "best" --Janke | Talk 22:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Suspended nominations
This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.