Regarding page reviewer
Thank you to everyone who recommended I try out the New Page Reviewer right, however, I have opted not to make it permanent nor do I intend on returning to it for as long as this message is up. New page reviewing doesn't seem to make sense to me given all I've ever used it for (mostly) was page reviewing redirects following bad article attempts. Even that part of Wikipedia has given me a small amount of stress, and I've had to back away from disputes to avoid making that stress worse.
In short, it doesn't make sense to me to keep a user right if I know I'm not going to use it as frequently, especially given I might leave Wikipedia within the next few years. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. I was coming here to leave a message to you regarding NPP, and saw this. Too bad, we could use quality folks over there, but I definitely understand about the stress. Thanks for all you do. Onel5969 TT me 15:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Jaiden Animations draft
So is this ready to pass notability? Please see Draft talk:Jaiden Animations and chime in on whether this is now ready to pass notability. If enough of the objectors in AFC and AFDs are on board, we can push to remove the salt. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- AngusWOOF, Thanks for notifying. I was only involved in this draft to remove a promotional version, but I would definitely say that the current version of the draft is a pass. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Crescent Dunes
Hi Jalen,
I have seen you have changed the editions I have done on Crescent Dunes. Not sure if you have anything related with this project but for some people that we work at this place and we have made it make it work, it is kind of frustating seing information that isn't accurate.
I hope you can respect the post I have done, as those are more accurate of what was posted I still let important information about the history of the project. There is also updated information that you don't have unless you were working here.
I have no account on wikipedia, not sure if you reply back I will be able to see.
Thanks for your support.
Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.29.212.98 (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi IP. It looks like you might have a conflict of interest; in other words, it's hard to write neutrally about the subject you are trying to edit. I've been reverting your and many other editors edits on this page for not only this very reason, but every attempt to claim reactivation of the project has gone unsourced. Since conflict of interest is in place here, it's best to avoid editing the article directly and instead propose these changes on the Talk page at Talk:Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project. Also, if you are being paid to make these edits, then you are required to disclose this as per WP:DISCLOSEPAY. Thank you for your understanding in this matter. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Deletion of Page Titled "Ayshia Taskin"
Good morning,
A page titled "Ayshia Taskin" was deleted before I could contest and give a reason why it should not be deleted. I see that it has been deleted and will add the reason here. I look forward to your reply.
"This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (The page regards the contribution to Intermedia art by a MENA-region, Turkish Cypriot female Intermedia artist and curator. Their conceptual artwork on the blockchain/NFT space corresponding with research on Intermedia art and how conceptual art is understood and experienced. Focus on this artist and page corresponds with research surrounding the 'creative female voice' focused on a diverse group of women artists which should be included on public knowledge sites like Wikipedia. Articles intended to spread knowledge and diversify perspectives and experiences of art due to female artists remaining 'undervalued' within the cannon of art history. Research is conducted on this artist-curator which aims to dissect and understand their contribution to Intermedia art which can be built upon by other researchers/writers on Wikipedia and edited to meet Wikipedia standards.
However, although I am putting effort into writing this Wikipedia entry, I have reason to believe it is futile and that there is a degree of racism or unconscious bias toward the artist where the page has been declined without any offer of editing through collaborative effort although live news coverage on BBC and News channels in Scotland, articles written and magazine entries about this artist exist. If the case is racism, bigotry or unconscious bias, then should information fall to gate-keeping by such individuals? I am sure, as logical individuals, you will agree on this matter. Otherwise, where is the objectivity of the reviewers? It would be appreciated if a variety of neutral reviewers could also look at, edit and contribute to the article based on the research conducted thus far or based on growing information. If it is not possible for this to happen, then perhaps the draft could remain untouched until other information becomes available? If any part of the draft is unambiguously promotional, then I openly request that such parts be rewritten by the community to meet Wikipedia standards.)" --0penS0urx (talk) 04:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- While "edited to meet Wikipedia standards" is valid, the subject does not appear to have sufficient notability for inclusion on Wikipedia, and a draft with only self-published citations adds to the promotion case. Also consider checking the wording on future drafts, as this is also what we look for when determining promotional editing (more at User:Deepfriedokra/promo). If my explanation isn't clear enough, I also recommend going to the talk page of the deleting admin and make your case there, as the deleting admin usually has a better explanation for the specific reason for deletion. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Tagging pages for speedy deletion
Hello, JalenFolf,
Please do not tag any pages as being the work of a blocked sockpuppeteer unless the account creating the page is a confirmed sockpuppet, not just based on your suspicions or on allegations in a SPI case. Now, I'm having to spend time untagging pages because the page creator of these drafts is not only not a confirmed sockpuppet but they aren't even blocked which is just a time-consuming task when I'd rather be doing other things. Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- You also need to identify what sockpuppeteer an account is a sockpuppet of so that an admin can follow up on the tagging by looking at an SPI or an account. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Liz, Would the affected pages by chance also be eligible for G11, save for one redirected draft? I know I tagged one of them for G11 in a multiple criteria template and nearly all drafts appear to be duplicates of each other per subject. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Liz: This is just a massive promotional sockfarm churning out dozens of the same articles under increasingly elaborate titles each day. The ranges are too wide and dynamic to block, but they they are indeed evading multiple blocks. I understand why you would be hesitant to CSD them, so I've done so. JalenFolf, perhaps to avoid confusion in the future, maybe just leave me a note on my talk page (as you did today) instead of tagging the articles? It may not be immediately obvious to the reviewing admins that the IPs are socking. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Liz, Would the affected pages by chance also be eligible for G11, save for one redirected draft? I know I tagged one of them for G11 in a multiple criteria template and nearly all drafts appear to be duplicates of each other per subject. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Meridional French and Francitan
Hello JalenFolf, There was a splitting in the french version between "Meridional French" and "Francitan". In english version, there's only "Meridional French". For all the others languages, there's only "Francitan".
I presume that english lectors of Wikipedia prefer to have an access to the both articles.--Diddou (talk) 15:31, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Diddou, Whatever the case is on other language wikis does not matter here; English Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are very different from the French Wikipedia. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
TheFatRat
I added the Youtube link to TheFatRat's MV on his channel. The revert was a mistake.
ABAL1412 (talk) 16:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)ABAL1412
- ABAL1412, The problem with your edits is that you did not provide sources for the genres you added. That, and the categories you added don't exist. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
This IP
Hi there, this IP, which you gave a much needed AA2 warning,[1] states that he works at the Nizami Ganjavi International Center, an institution funded by the government of the Republic of Azerbaijan. The obvious conflict of interest is therefore even admitted by himself (promoting Ilham Aliyev and the overal doctrines of his government). The IP is also trying[2] all that he can to obscure the Persian origins of one of the greatest Persian poets (Nizami Ganjavi), in line with another well-known doctrine of the republic of Azerbaijan where they try to Azerbaijanify/Turkify this historic figure (see also; Campaign on granting Nizami the status of the national poet of Azerbaijan, Historical_negationism#Azerbaijan, Media freedom in Azerbaijan). IMO, if this continues, this IP should be blocked per WP:NOTHERE and WP:SOAPBOX. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- For the record, I just noticed that he keeps accusing you.[3] This won't look good at ANI. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:11, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- LouisAragon, I'll be sure to make my comments when the ANI report happens. Thanks! Jalen Folf (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)