You've been absent for awhile
Hope everything is ok. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Same here. Crossroads -talk- 03:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ditto - hope you're OK Girth Summit (blether) 07:57, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Sourceror
Hi there! I hope things are well. Wanted to check in with you regarding Sourceror, I know Ahmed would like to get in touch with you about closing out the project. Cheers, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Newslinger:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
Appeal topic ban
Hey I created an appeal for a topic banned you created in March. I hope it can be repealed, due to my apologies for previous actions. Thanks have a good day. [1] 3Kingdoms (talk) 01:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Listing of Forbes magazine
You appear to have contributed to the discussion of Forbes magazine as a reliable source last April which resulted in what looks like an odd addition to the Reliable Sources list for Forbes. It appears odd because "Forbes" is listed as reliable but "Forbes.com" is listed as unreliable. This does not appear to work because many of Forbes staff writers have they articles available on Forbes.com as that magazine's electronic data base. The current presentation of these two sources as on the one hand reliable and on the other hand unreliable appears further to be inconsistent since the Forbes staff writers have their articles in both places. Could you glance at this on the listing of reliable sources page since they are listed back-to-back? ErnestKrause (talk) 16:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- ErnestKrause, I would suggest taking a look at the list again, it refers to Forbes.com contributors as unreliable. Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back. The distinction of the two sources seems to say that Forbes.com is unreliable since it does not currently state an exception for Forbes staff writers. Also, since contributors do appear in the hard-copy version of the magazine, this distinction of staff versus contributor does not seem easy to apply. The hard-copy magazine which publishes both staff articles and contributor articles is reliable, but the contributors on Forbes.com, which include those published contributor articles in the hard-copy magazine, are unreliable? ErnestKrause (talk) 16:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) comment: The unreliable rating is applied specifically to
Forbes.com contributors
, notForbes.com
. For print articles by contributor, the description forForbes.com contributors
saysArticles that have also been published in the print edition of Forbes are excluded, and are considered generally reliable.
Schazjmd (talk) 16:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) comment: The unreliable rating is applied specifically to
- Thanks for getting back. The distinction of the two sources seems to say that Forbes.com is unreliable since it does not currently state an exception for Forbes staff writers. Also, since contributors do appear in the hard-copy version of the magazine, this distinction of staff versus contributor does not seem easy to apply. The hard-copy magazine which publishes both staff articles and contributor articles is reliable, but the contributors on Forbes.com, which include those published contributor articles in the hard-copy magazine, are unreliable? ErnestKrause (talk) 16:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
You doing alright?
Hey. You doing alright Newslinger? You haven't edited in quite a while. NarSakSasLee (talk) 19:54, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Maintenance tag
I'm not sure what my agenda is. It would be nice to know what I'm supposed to fix. My templates?? I wanna figure it out so I can move forward. GetWellSoonJun2921 (talk) 03:20, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Notification
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Nicoljaus, indef topic ban and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks,--Nicoljaus (talk) 10:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Where is Newslinger?
I'm sure someone knows something Renat 13:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Amendment request: Nicoljaus, indef topic ban declined
The amendment request Amendment request: Nicoljaus, indef topic ban, has been declined by the Committee. You can review the closed amendement request here. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 12:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)