→What is a vested contributor?: new section |
Salvio giuliano (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I've seen the term thrown around, but different people seem to intend it differently, including slightly pejoratively. Can I ask what is meant by it, and if the term is intended to encompass a class of editors? If you are intending remedies that would apply against a wide range of people, the time allotted may not be sufficient.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC) |
I've seen the term thrown around, but different people seem to intend it differently, including slightly pejoratively. Can I ask what is meant by it, and if the term is intended to encompass a class of editors? If you are intending remedies that would apply against a wide range of people, the time allotted may not be sufficient.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 01:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
:{{Small|Quick reply before turning in.}} This case will only deal with the conduct of the parties; the name has been chosen because, to be very frank, I did not like the idea of using an editor's real name as case name. It can be changed, if someone comes up with a better name, but, for my money, it's an incredibly unimportant issue... <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano|<sup>Let's talk about it!</sup>]] 01:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:56, 29 October 2015
Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
What is a vested contributor?
I've seen the term thrown around, but different people seem to intend it differently, including slightly pejoratively. Can I ask what is meant by it, and if the term is intended to encompass a class of editors? If you are intending remedies that would apply against a wide range of people, the time allotted may not be sufficient.--Wehwalt (talk) 01:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Quick reply before turning in. This case will only deal with the conduct of the parties; the name has been chosen because, to be very frank, I did not like the idea of using an editor's real name as case name. It can be changed, if someone comes up with a better name, but, for my money, it's an incredibly unimportant issue... Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC)