User | Talk | Archives | My work | Sandbox | Resources | News | Stats |
---|
|
"Daybooks" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Daybooks and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Daybooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Tevildo (talk) 17:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
"Ebony.(Serial)." listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ebony.(Serial). and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22#Ebony.(Serial). until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 05:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Redirects
Hello, Headbomb,
I deleted all of those redirects you tagged as being CSD R3....and then went back and checked them and none of them were "recently created redirects" (most were at least a year old or older) and so I just restored them all and untagged them. Yes, they were implausible, but it seems like they are page creations of User:TokenzeroBot which is responsible for exactly these types of page creations. You might bring this matter up with the bot operator User:Tokenzero if you are finding more of them unlikely redirects. Or, you could do a batch deletion of these at WP:RFD to take care of them. Thanks for finding so many implausible redirects but I had to turn down your deletion requests. Liz Read! Talk! 23:59, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I swear the bureaucracy in this place... Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
A pie for you!
Just sending over some so called "Wiki-love". This pies for you for creating the deprec*a*ted script. Cheers!
If you're not a pie fan. I'll find something else to wiki-bake as substitute. :-) CaribDigita (talk) 16:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC) |