My Contributions
|
Bhumika Gurung recreation
Hi! I learnt that I have to approach you for the recreation of the blp article of Bhumika Gurung. Her article was deleted with the stated reason of lack of notability WP:N which is not correct as the actress has done several lead roles. She was the lead with titular role in Nimki Mukhiya & Nimki Vidhayak and also negative lead Mann Kee Awaaz Pratigya 2. Apart from these lead roles she has also done prominent roles in films. She is verified across all social media platforms as a notable actress. So, I request the article be restored to draft space so that I can make suitable edits to it, to make it suitable for mainspace. Can you please help me with it because you were the administrator who WP:SALTed the page?Commonedits (talk) 07:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Commonedits: There is no deleted history at [1]. If you want to use an existing revision as the basis for a draft, you can follow WP:RUU and provide a link to the revision in your edit summary, and then continue working within draft space. ST47 (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- @ST47: Ok thank you. Can you explain how exactly I should go about to provide a link in the edit summary? Commonedits (talk) 05:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Alex The Ander
You blocked this user a while back as a sock of Bodiadub. Since that user has been globally blocked, I declined Alex's unblock request on the grounds that it is not for us patrolling admins to lift the blocks of globally blocked sockmasters, and it was apparently based on checkuser data anyway.
He has emailed me and insisted he has nothing to do with Bodiadub, that he is willing to provide proof of his real identity as a Miami-area journalists. I don't see anything in their edit histories that overlap. Is there something I can't see that shows up in the checkuser data? Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: His appeal is currently with ArbCom. It appears to be a case of account sharing with a globally banned user. ST47 (talk) 15:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
192.80.184.0/22 block
I want to let you know that 192.80.184.0/22 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) and 192.80.188.0/23 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) no longer belong to a webhost... it's part of the range 192.80.184.0/21 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) which is registered to "COASTAL TELCO SERVICES", which is a home ISP in Maine. wizzito | say hello! 23:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Interestingly it was handed over to Coastal Telco just 2 days after you made your latest 3yr block... weird. wizzito | say hello! 23:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Wizzito: Thanks for the info, I've unblocked them. How do you know the date it was transferred? Are you basing that on the update date in whois? ST47 (talk) 00:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah wizzito | say hello! 03:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- P.S. 45.83.4.0/22 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) belongs to Freedom Internet now, same rationale as the unblock of 45.80.168.0/22 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). wizzito | say hello! 05:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah wizzito | say hello! 03:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Wizzito: Thanks for the info, I've unblocked them. How do you know the date it was transferred? Are you basing that on the update date in whois? ST47 (talk) 00:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Interestingly it was handed over to Coastal Telco just 2 days after you made your latest 3yr block... weird. wizzito | say hello! 23:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian – Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian – Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian – Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news
Nomination for deletion of Template:Editnotice SCW CR
Template:Editnotice SCW CR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)