2006 • 2007 • 2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022 • |
Proposed deletion of Emmerson Brooks-Meade
![Notice](https://web.archive.org/web/20220530215157im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Emmerson Brooks-Meade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Maurice Cooreman
I have a funeral letter from Maurice Cooreman .. where can I mail this to ? Rafa009 (talk) 12:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- (by talk reader) @Rafa009: Wikipedia does not compile offline sources and we do not present original research. Please also keep in mind that we only publish what is verifiable as we care not for what is actually true. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- As I have already told you, Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. It seems odd that Mr Cooreman would have died and no media outlet reported it. If you have evidence to the contrary, please consider using WP:OTRS. GiantSnowman 13:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
2021–22 Tottenham Hotspur F.C. season
On a scale of one too ten, how bad is this page in your edit-war book!! page history :/ Govvy (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
User:Seasider53, who could not care less about your warning, has reverted me in two articles where i actually ADDED REFS!! --2001:8A0:767B:9C00:ECBA:8C6A:2360:11D7 (talk) 21:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tiago_Gomes_(footballer,_born_1986)&diff=1090493597&oldid=1090493492) and here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jes%C3%BAs_Vallejo&diff=1090493898&oldid=1090493861). Attentively --193.137.135.2 (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi @Seasider53: I am concerned by these blind reverts of seemingly good edits. Would you care to explain before I have to escalate for wider review? GiantSnowman 18:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- For the reasons I gave in my reversion summaries. Seemed suspicious, given the extended and obscure edit summaries that had to be matched to the changes, which included external links to non-English websites. If we're asking for clarification, maybe you have one for this reversion you made to one of my edits because you found it "non-constructive" without even giving any further details? We all make mistakes. Seasider53 (talk) 18:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see any edit summary in the Jesús Vallejo edit...and my Bowyer summary was valid. GiantSnowman 18:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Should I itemise the questions I have about the reversion you made? Bear in mind, the edits were allowed (and are still in place) after I gave pushback on it. Seasider53 (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- you mean where you continued to revert and then were reverted by another user? Sure, go for it. GiantSnowman 19:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Was the other user correct to revert (as in, which part of my edit required consensus on the talk page)? Just trying to get my ducks in a row before going any further. Seasider53 (talk) 19:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- you mean where you continued to revert and then were reverted by another user? Sure, go for it. GiantSnowman 19:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Should I itemise the questions I have about the reversion you made? Bear in mind, the edits were allowed (and are still in place) after I gave pushback on it. Seasider53 (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see any edit summary in the Jesús Vallejo edit...and my Bowyer summary was valid. GiantSnowman 18:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Also see this (the old "fine as it was" dismissive) from before my outrageous edits and this one from after. But anyway, getting back to the point of the thread, it appears I should not have reverted, but if the editor makes an account, I will ask them to be clearer in their edit summaries. Seasider53 (talk) 19:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2022)
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Turkey (bird) • Cheque Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|