Requests for page protection | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This page is for requesting that a page, file or template be protected. Please read up on the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used only to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, the protection is listed in the page history and logs with a short description indicating why it was protected, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. Further discussion should take place on the Talk page of the article. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins do not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Note: Editors should not consider requesting page protection as a method for continuing an argument from elsewhere nor as a venue for starting a new discussion regarding article content. If a request contains excessive argument, appears to be intended to resolve a content dispute, includes personal attacks or uncivil comments, or has any other unrelated discussion, it will be removed from this page and no action will be taken.
|
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Hambirrao Mohite
- Hambirrao Mohite (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: High level of consistent IP vandalism on this page. Page was protected earlier for a week but after expiration, article has been constantly disrupted. Need page protected with access to confirmed users only. MehmoodS (talk) 19:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Laksmi De-Neefe Suardana
- Laksmi De-Neefe Suardana (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unreferenced details added; edit warring; article ownership. Migsmigss (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
2022 UEFA Champions League Final
- 2022 UEFA Champions League Final (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Volten001 ☎ 21:57, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Humane Columbia
- Humane Columbia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Multiple new sockpuppets attack. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#David26531,_Andy22336,_Jhon18729,_Tommytom13_and_Juan239272_WP:SOCK_and_WP:POV — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Historic Pact for Colombia
- Historic Pact for Colombia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Multiple new sockpuppets attack. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#David26531,_Andy22336,_Jhon18729,_Tommytom13_and_Juan239272_WP:SOCK_and_WP:POV — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Team for Colombia
- Team for Colombia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Multiple new sockpuppets attack. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#David26531,_Andy22336,_Jhon18729,_Tommytom13_and_Juan239272_WP:SOCK_and_WP:POV — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Elections in Peru
- Elections in Peru (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Multiple new sockpuppets attack. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#David26531,_Andy22336,_Jhon18729,_Tommytom13_and_Juan239272_WP:SOCK_and_WP:POV — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Libertarian Party (United States)
- Libertarian Party (United States) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Curbon7 (talk) 01:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Bimal Acharya
- Bimal Acharya (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 02:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Danny Carey
- Danny Carey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ip's keep removing sourced content. RF23 (talk) 03:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
F3 (film)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent unsourced changes by IPs/new users to BO figures and critical reception. Ab207 (talk) 13:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Kishmish
Reason: High level of IP vendalism Thenfsa (talk) 13:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Road signs in Malaysia
- Road signs in Malaysia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Multiple unlogged in IP users from the same ISP and area are doing disruptive edits on this article. They are reinstating old PNG images and removing the descriptions when there is newer SVG images that follow a new sign format and a lot more high resolution.
This content dispute is addressed in the talk page to discuss, but since these users are making mobile, visual edits it is most likely they will never reply.
Currently I think this is the only way other than banning the IPs but they will just return with a new IP address like they did before. Thank you. ItsTomato (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Specifically, 114.122.128.0/18 has been blocked from editing this article for 3 months. Favonian (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Meena Jutla
- Meena Jutla (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous users continue to add validly removed information and are not liaising with other editors. I am reporting this now since I do not want to create or engage in an edit war. Blanchey (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:CEE Spring 2022
- Wikipedia talk:CEE Spring 2022 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Semiprotection requested as a lot of new accounts appear to have been spamming frequently these past few days. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 14:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
List of large volcanic eruptions in the 21st century
- List of large volcanic eruptions in the 21st century (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. HurricaneEdgar 16:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Compañero y Compañera
- Compañero y Compañera (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from an IP user which has been going on for months. TheHotwiki (talk) 16:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Adam Adli
Reason: Avoiding unnecessarily editing Amfiq92 (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read the instructions at the top of this page. "Unnecessarily editing" is not a protection criteria. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
FIFA
156.174.22.208 (talk) 17:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Cypriot Greek
- Cypriot Greek (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: I am requesting semi-protection due to persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Demetrios1993 (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Cupcakke
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 18:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Jesus
Indefinite or temporary for a long time, extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite semi protection, unwanted edits keep coming, so this needs to be protected more. This page is simply very susceptible to vandalism. Drummingman (talk) 18:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Uttarakhand
- Uttarakhand (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Please Permanent Protection this article because some people vandisam TheManishPanwar (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Aspartame
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP adding the usual badly sourced and debunked claims and not discussing in talk. Unbh (talk) 19:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Frenkie de Jong
- Frenkie de Jong (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism with unproven changes. Ultraprime12345 (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
|
1917 (2019 film)
- 1917 (2019 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Protection exists because of 1 IP edit warrior over a year ago. I doubt this film is a active target for vandals nowadays SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping Primefac. It looks like 79.53.128.0/17, home to the editor whose antics caused the protection, is still active, and some of the edits are – disconcerting. Favonian (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Not super-inclined - I count a half-dozen IPs, in which every edit from January 2021 has been redacted or suppressed. My protection was not a one-off, it was due to escalating protections previously. If someone wants to overrule me I will not stand in their way, I agree with Favonian's disconcert. Primefac (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Not unprotected – For the record, the protection was caused by BLP violations, not just edit-warring. Someone has a very unhealthy focus on one of the actors in this film, and as the above mentioned IP range still produces a number of unhinged edits, I'm coming down on the side of caution. Favonian (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Imran Khan
- Imran Khan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because of a significantly lower rate of possible vandalism on the page due to recent occurrences.. . Ultraprime12345 (talk) 19:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
Gamergate (harassment campaign)
- Gamergate (harassment campaign) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I’m not sure if “right wing” is explicitly correct in it’s entirety, and seems a little oddly biased in its writing. I’d prefer changing “right wing” to “misogynistic” or “anti-feminist”, as ‘right-wing’ is kind of vague nowadays, with the term being used inconsistently to describe certain groups that can or have been perceived as on the political right in many a few cases. It just doesn’t sound very precise in my opinion. MaxOS117 (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Bennedict Mathurin
- Bennedict Mathurin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The Bennedict Mathurin needs to mention his 3/21/22 groping allegations. This was caught on video, widely discussed in the media, and reported by credibly outlets. An administrator, Drmies, and other users seem to be trying to suppress any mention of this incident. Truth Possum (talk) 17:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please see the recent history of that article: these I consider to be BLP violations considering the size of the edit and the paucity of the sourcing; the user is welcome to make their case on the talk page but hasn't seen fit to do so. Drmies (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- How is ESPN not a valid source? Making this briefer doesn't allow for any mention of Mathurin's denial of the allegations. Because of the sensitivity of these allegations, the more in-depth discussion feels necessary. Do you have any suggestions that don't result in completely suppressing the matter altogether? Truth Possum (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sheesh. Yes. DISCUSS IT ON THE TALK PAGE AND LOOK FOR CONSENSUS. And don't twist my rationale into "ESPN is unreliable"--that's disingenuous. As far as I'm concerned, that content is so undue that the admin who looks at this might well consider rev-deleting. Drmies (talk) 17:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please clarify: "that content is so undue"?
- Will a shorter version of this story citing ESPN meet your standards then? Truth Possum (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sheesh. Yes. DISCUSS IT ON THE TALK PAGE AND LOOK FOR CONSENSUS. And don't twist my rationale into "ESPN is unreliable"--that's disingenuous. As far as I'm concerned, that content is so undue that the admin who looks at this might well consider rev-deleting. Drmies (talk) 17:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- How is ESPN not a valid source? Making this briefer doesn't allow for any mention of Mathurin's denial of the allegations. Because of the sensitivity of these allegations, the more in-depth discussion feels necessary. Do you have any suggestions that don't result in completely suppressing the matter altogether? Truth Possum (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Not done – Wrong venue. There are now discussions at Talk:Bennedict Mathurin as well as WP:BLPN. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.