Buzk's Gard National Nature Park
Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2022 at 19:10:24 (UTC)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220531035815im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/%D0%92%D1%96%D0%B4%D1%8C%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D1%96_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%83.jpg/451px-%D0%92%D1%96%D0%B4%D1%8C%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D1%96_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%83.jpg)
Original – Panorama of an area in the Buzk's Gard National Nature Park, Mykolaiv Oblast, Ukraine.
- Reason
- Good capture.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Buzk's Gard National Nature Park
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
- Creator
- Vian
- Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 19:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support A little further down the page than I'd like, but it feels reasonably prominent. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.8% of all FPs 09:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Stunningly gorgeous photo! --Janke | Talk 19:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support – Lots of texture. –Sca (talk) 13:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not encyclopaedic. Too much 'artistic' editing including vignetting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles. This is too manipulated, which greatly reduces the EV. Nick-D (talk) 09:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. The unnatural combination of low contrast, high saturation, and vignetting make this look more like a painting than a photograph. I agree with the others above that the image editing crosses the line beyond technical correction and into unencyclopedic artistic effects. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)