1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 |
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 256Drg (talk • contribs) 09:40, May 3, 2021 (UTC)
Audrey Truschke
Deserves a 30/500 protection under ARBIPA. Consult recent edits. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks; semi-protection is prob. warranted at Gyanvapi Mosque. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- EPC - indefinite, please. Semi isn't helping. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- I second that. Even EPC wouldn't guard against the editor that got 3RR warning this morning. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Looks like it will only partly help but done anyway (not sure why this mosque is topical?)--RegentsPark (comment) 20:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hindutva wants it back. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- We need semi-protection of the t/p too. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Soomra dynasty need to be indefinitely semi-ed under ARBIPA — edit-warring to insert Rajput in lead (or delete Dani's comments) for the past one year. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- RegentsPark is not some kind of janitor at everyone's beck and call. As V. S. Naipaul said (before me), "Don't bring Regents Park every two-bit squabble to resolve. Bring only the big battles." Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Forgot to say: both the late V. S. Naipaul and I are (talk page stalker)s Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- RegentsPark is not some kind of janitor at everyone's beck and call. As V. S. Naipaul said (before me), "Don't bring Regents Park every two-bit squabble to resolve. Bring only the big battles." Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Soomra dynasty need to be indefinitely semi-ed under ARBIPA — edit-warring to insert Rajput in lead (or delete Dani's comments) for the past one year. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- We need semi-protection of the t/p too. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hindutva wants it back. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Looks like it will only partly help but done anyway (not sure why this mosque is topical?)--RegentsPark (comment) 20:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- I second that. Even EPC wouldn't guard against the editor that got 3RR warning this morning. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- EPC - indefinite, please. Semi isn't helping. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks; semi-protection is prob. warranted at Gyanvapi Mosque. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done. F&f, it is fine to bring these requests to my talk page. The main role of an admin is janitorial! --RegentsPark (comment) 15:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Alha
Could you look at the content dispute? To me, neither preferred veersion is good. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: That and Udal of Mahoba are a mess and I think we should just revert to some version before these two new editors arrived on the scene. Perhaps @Bonadea: has ideas? --RegentsPark (comment) 15:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I see you've reverted and fully protected, for the best. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I would happily see both TBANned at this point. My impression is caste warfare/glorification --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I dropped a CS CASTE notice on Iamritwikaryan's (littered with warnings) talk page. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Why do we even need a separate page on Udal of Mahoba? TrangaBellam (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I dropped a CS CASTE notice on Iamritwikaryan's (littered with warnings) talk page. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I would happily see both TBANned at this point. My impression is caste warfare/glorification --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I see you've reverted and fully protected, for the best. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Unexplained addition or removal across multiple pages
Hi, some user @Smith Jats is editing multiple pages and adding/removing things without any explanation. All without any source. Please check the user contributions. Thank you. Krayon95 (talk) 02:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
You talk my page.Smith Jats (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Need your attention here
Dear Admin, I checked that you have blocked the user ( for 1 week ) who created this page [[1]], is such caste based Wiki project allowed? I have not seen any similar example till date. I think the above newly created page should be deleted. Akalanka820 (talk) 17:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Is this statement true?
"You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general." RegentsPark Is this correct? MehmoodS (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MehmoodS: Not to my knowledge. Imo, quotes should be avoided (because they are lazy) but if there is a quote less than 25 words you probably don't even need the quote= parameter. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- RegentsPark Thanks. Just wanted to confirm as an editor used this excuse to revert my changes. [2] and here is my change that was reverted.[3]. Before my change, in the article, in infobox, result section, the quotes were incorrect or you can say mis-represented as those weren't the correct quotes about the conclusion of the war but rather about initial war. And when I corrected the quote as it seemed necessary due to many disruption on the page, two editors reverted the change without any discussion. Seems like they are pushing POV. Even they are using two unreliable sources by Y.G. Bhave and Barbara West where earlier is a scholar in humanist and the latter is anthropologist. Not historians. MehmoodS (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MehmoodS: The diff you've provided above has the edit summary "Copyvio and POV pushing", and there is a a talk page discussion on the result. The 25 word limit is, of course, not the case but Aman.kumar.goel seems to have moved on from that reasoning. The reliability of the sources is best evaluated at WP:RSN and you will need consensus on the result since you're changing it from the status quo. You could ask for more eyes on WT:IN. --RegentsPark (comment) 17:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- RegentsPark Thanks. Just wanted to confirm as an editor used this excuse to revert my changes. [2] and here is my change that was reverted.[3]. Before my change, in the article, in infobox, result section, the quotes were incorrect or you can say mis-represented as those weren't the correct quotes about the conclusion of the war but rather about initial war. And when I corrected the quote as it seemed necessary due to many disruption on the page, two editors reverted the change without any discussion. Seems like they are pushing POV. Even they are using two unreliable sources by Y.G. Bhave and Barbara West where earlier is a scholar in humanist and the latter is anthropologist. Not historians. MehmoodS (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete the article
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripura_People%27s_Front as it is not notable one. Wikifulness (talk) 12:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- I can't do that. You will need to try WP:PROD and, if that does not work, then try WP:AFD. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Page moving
The page titled Thori (tribe) has been recently moved to Kalash tribe without explanation. Including unexplained removal of content. Recent editors are @Virendra Raghuwanshi and @Smith Jats. Seems like it was done in imitation of Kalash people. Please check. Thank you. Krayon95 (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I undid the move. If you could restore the last best version, I'll keep watch on it. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Nupur Sharma (politician)
Thank you for the protection. Can you please also take a look at the related event article 2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy. It is currently unprotected. Venkat TL (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I semi-protected that one but will continue to watch it. --RegentsPark (comment) 13:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I almost got blocked for asking this Venkat TL (talk) 13:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Jeypore Estate
May I know why have you removed my edit? I am providing a legitimate source of Raphael Rousseleau. MasterClass8x (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MasterClass8x: I'll respond on the article talk page in a little while. Best to keep it there. --RegentsPark (comment) 19:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)