WT:RFAR archives (2004–2009) |
---|
Various archives (2004–2011): |
Ongoing WT:A/R archives (2009–): |
WT:RFAR subpages |
Archive of prior proceedings |
Semi-protected edit request on 30 July 2022
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 08:33, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Edit request: banned user talkpage
- moved from User talk:Jytdog
Since Jytdog is banned, please remove all content on his userpage and replace with the following (invisible unless viewed in edit source):
Another example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ALugnuts&type=revision&diff=1102002458&oldid=1101167456 Yleventa2 (talk) 19:52, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note to reviewing admin: I've asked ArbCom to clarify this here: [1]. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- This page isn't the right place for this discussion but a specific user's talk page is absolutely a worse place. I would decline the request. This decision is made on a case-by-case basis and there is no policy mandating blanking. Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/Procedures § Enacting bans and editing restrictions, which is a procedural guide, doesn't say to blank. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- (pings: @Yleventa2 and Tryptofish: KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- This page isn't the right place for this discussion but a specific user's talk page is absolutely a worse place. I would decline the request. This decision is made on a case-by-case basis and there is no policy mandating blanking. Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/Procedures § Enacting bans and editing restrictions, which is a procedural guide, doesn't say to blank. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- comments made post-move:
- @L235: I see, thanks. What determines whether pages of banned users get blanked or not? Yleventa2 (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- With all due respect Yleventa2, it's probably best you don't worry about that and find something more constructive to do
— TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 20:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- I will do that TheresNoTime Yleventa2 (talk) 20:31, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- With all due respect Yleventa2, it's probably best you don't worry about that and find something more constructive to do
- @L235: I see, thanks. What determines whether pages of banned users get blanked or not? Yleventa2 (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt response, L235! I'll note that the edit (not the request) was reverted by Praxidicae; thanks for that, too. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- And I reverted this blanking, and will again, if required. Just leave these people alone, Yleventa2. Bishonen | tålk 20:31, 3 August 2022 (UTC).
- I've gone ahead and restored Lugnut's userpage, since I see no need to blank here. A tag would be sufficient. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- @CaptainEek: You reverted the banned user template along with reverting the blanking. Perhaps you didn't intend that. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tryptofish Huh, didn't even see it, but I've added it back. Is it supposed to be visible? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:31, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I saw it in the edit history, but the only thing visible on the user page is a hidden category. The thinking behind making the template non-displaying is discussed at the ACN talkpage section about the deletions case. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Just as an fyi: Template:Banned user/doc § Syntax has details on how to use the template for users banned by the arbitration committee. isaacl (talk) 22:52, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tryptofish Huh, didn't even see it, but I've added it back. Is it supposed to be visible? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:31, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- @CaptainEek: You reverted the banned user template along with reverting the blanking. Perhaps you didn't intend that. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)