This page was last edited or modified by Feminist (talk · contribs · count · logs · email) on Friday 10:43:37 August 5, 2022 UTC.
Wikipedia:Babel | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 |
The Signpost: 29 May 2022
- From the team: A changing of the guard
- News and notes: 2022 Wikimedia Board elections
- Community view: Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections
- In the media: Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
- Special report: Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Discussion report: Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19 revisited
- Technology report: A new video player for Wikimedia wikis
- Featured content: Featured Content of April
- Interview: Wikipedia's pride
- Serendipity: Those thieving image farms
- Recent research: 35 million Twitter links analysed
- Tips and tricks: The reference desks of Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Strange highs and strange lows
- News from Diff: Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced
- News from the WMF: The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?
- From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia
- Humour: A new crossword
Nomination of Lists of accolades by film for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of accolades by film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Indagate (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Oversight" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Oversight and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 19#Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Oversight until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 June 2022
- News and notes: WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks
- In the media: Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down
- Special report: "Wikipedia's independence" or "Wikimedia's pile of dosh"?
- Discussion report: MoS rules on CCP name mulled, XRV axe plea nulled, mass drafting bid pulled
- Featured content: Articles on Scots' clash, Yank's tux, Austrian's action flick deemed brilliant prose
- Recent research: Wikipedia versus academia (again), tables' "immortality" probed
- Serendipity: Was she really a Swiss lesbian automobile racer?
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Enterprise signs first deals
- Gallery: Celebration of summer, winter
FAR for Hurricane Irene
I have nominated Hurricane Irene (1999) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 02:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Thanks for your outstanding work on List of nicknames used by Donald Trump. Viriditas (talk) 08:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:Skippy logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Skippy logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gold Derby Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Gold Derby Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 August 2022
- From the editors: Rise of the machines, or something
- News and notes: Information considered harmful
- In the media: Censorship, medieval hoaxes, "pathetic supervillains", FB-WMF AI TL bid, dirty duchess deeds done dirt cheap
- Op-Ed: The "recession" affair
- Eyewitness Wikimedian – Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (part 3)
- Community view: Youth culture and notability
- Opinion: Criminals among us
- Arbitration report: Winds of change blow for cyclone editors, deletion dustup draws toward denouement
- Deletion report: This is Gonzo Country
- Discussion report: Notability for train stations, notices for mobile editors, noticeboards for the rest of us
- Featured content: A little list with surprisingly few lists
- Tips and tricks: Cleaning up awful citations with Citation bot
- On the bright side: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war — three (more) stories
- Essay: How to research an image
- Recent research: A century of rulemaking on Wikipedia analyzed
- Serendipity: Don't cite Wikipedia
- Gallery: A backstage pass
- From the archives: 2012 Russian Wikipedia shutdown as it happened
Orphaned non-free image File:Younique.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Younique.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Viatris stock index listings
Hi Feminist. I would like to discuss whether Viatris's Infobox should include the fact that the company is listed on the Russell 1000 Index and the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index, since you removed those indices on April 27. According to the documentation at Template:Infobox company, there seems to be no problem adding additional indices that the company is a component of: "Information about the company's status as a component of a major index can also be added." Other publicly traded companies list multiple indices when applicable, such as Vimeo, Gilead Sciences and Novavax. I hope you will reconsider your edit and add back the two indices to the Infobox. Thanks so much. PittGuy123ABC (talk) 14:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi PittGuy123ABC, most articles about publicly-traded American corporations contain listings of Dow Jones, S&P and Nasdaq-100 indices because these are generally considered the most significant stock market indices in the US based on usage and search interest. In my experience, only if a company is not included in any of these indices are they be listed as a component of less significant indices such as the Russell 1000 or 2000. Note MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE:
keep in mind the purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article ... The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance.
Most (if not all) members of the S&P 500 are also members of the Russell 1000, making the latter designation redundant. As for the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index, I have rarely if ever seen it on other articles, and it does not appear to be a "major index" compared to the likes of DJIA and S&P 500. I'm happy to start a site-wide discussion/RFC on this issue if necessary. feminist (talk) 10:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)