- Note
- Email may very occasionally be delayed due to spam filtering.
|
"Dark Grey" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dark Grey and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 14#Dark Grey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Q28 (talk) 05:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- With a capital it is an X11 colour. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 07:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC).
- On our colour pages we should eschew https://color-register.org/ as a source. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 09:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC).
Nomination for deletion of Template:Tropical cyclone classification
Template:Tropical cyclone classification has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jason Rees (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
"Slow Blind Driveway" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Slow Blind Driveway and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Slow Blind Driveway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- This is easily referenced here, here and strangely enough here. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 07:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC).
"Aluminium(metal)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Aluminium(metal) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 23#Aluminium(metal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 14:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:BLP unsourced section
Template:BLP unsourced section has been nominated for merging with Template:Unreferenced section. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 21:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:BLP sources section
Template:BLP sources section has been nominated for merging with Template:More citations needed section. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 21:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
"Slow Blind Driveway" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Slow Blind Driveway and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 14#Slow Blind Driveway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mambele (disambiguation)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220904010544im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mambele (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Steel1943 (talk) 18:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Category:ISO 639 name from code templates has been nominated for renaming
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220904010544im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:ISO 639 name from code templates has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tragic Black albums
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220904010544im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Category:Tragic Black albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Quick infobox
Template:Quick infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Coats of arms of dioceses of the Philippines
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220904010544im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Category:Coats of arms of dioceses of the Philippines indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 00:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:D&D/importance
Template:D&D/importance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Articles needing attention progress
Template:Articles needing attention progress has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 22:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Re-run of Helpful Pixie Bot for unreferenced articles dating
Hi Rich! I hope you're doing well. I am making my way through the unreferenced articles and noticed that in the 19,000+ articles tagged as December 2009, a good number were not actually created in December 2009. We are all pleased to have gotten through December 2006 so we can say the backlog is (only) 15 years old, but one of the December 2009 articles, as an example, dates back to January 2005. I don't know much about how the bot works but I was wondering if it would be possible to run it again to break down this super-category into more manageable chunks, even if it means re-opening some finished categories. Is this something you would be interested in doing, or think is feasible? I'm trying to get some momentum for WP:URA and could see this as a proverbial kick in the pants to shake things up. Thanks! Kazamzam (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, it would need a re-write, but it would be possible. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC).
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Ink Spots albums
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220904010544im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Category:The Ink Spots albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi User:Liz. I've asked you before not to leave me these messages in respect of albums categories. However in this case, the question of what happened to the Ink Spots album articles should be raised. As a pioneering and very important American musical group, quite apart from breaking ground in the industry for African Americans, their work is highly notable, and I am surprised that their albums articles have been deleted. Or more accurately I am not surprised, we seem to prefer deleting articles to finding sources to build them out. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC).
Speedy deletion nomination of Quiche Lorraine (disambiguation)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220904010544im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Quiche Lorraine (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Shhhnotsoloud, since this is now deleted I can't check the history, but I imagine it disambiguated between Quiche Lorraine and Quiche Lorraine (song). All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC).
- It was a redirect to Quiche Lorraine, which was a dab with three entries but has since been converted into an article. This deletion is just housekeeping. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. The correct housekeeping would have been to move the disambiguation page located at the primary title to Quiche Lorraine (disambiguation), before splitting the quiche article. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC).
- Meh, with only three titles to distinguish and a clear primary topic, hatnotes work fine now that the main title is an article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. The correct housekeeping would have been to move the disambiguation page located at the primary title to Quiche Lorraine (disambiguation), before splitting the quiche article. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC).
- It was a redirect to Quiche Lorraine, which was a dab with three entries but has since been converted into an article. This deletion is just housekeeping. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Mellohi!
You are wrong in two important respects. Firstly you did notify me, and secondly I am not banned. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC).
Nomination for deletion of Template:Prefix pages/doc/demo
Template:Prefix pages/doc/demo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 06:03, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
"Issac Wayne (1699-1774)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Issac Wayne (1699-1774) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 12#Issac Wayne (1699-1774) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dwkaminski (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Limited availability
Template:Limited availability has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Grove and Grubb
Template:Grove and Grubb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Yard craft
![Notice](https://web.archive.org/web/20220904010544im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Yard craft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No sources are cited within this article, and this has been tagged since March 2021. It seems that this page has been abandoned. However, if someone finds sources, then please remove this PROD and add them to the article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fats40boy11 (talk) 11:39, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Fats40boy11: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=c15PrCgw56QC for example? All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC).