|
|
Programs list of Hum TV
Move Ibn-e-Hawwa to the list of former programming. 111.88.86.114 (talk) 11:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Module:Taxobox
You seem to be attempting to bypass {{Taxobox/core}}
in creating this module. This is highly undesirable, as {{Taxobox/core}}
is used not only by the minority of articles that now use manual taxoboxes, but also by all the automated taxoboxes, which ensures consistency across all kinds of taxobox. See Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system/map.
The whole taxobox system, manual and automated, is highly complex and integrated. Please discuss what you are attempting to do before releasing anything, even the sandbox versions. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hey there. I've gotten a similar caution from someone else. At the moment, I'm looking to make a functioning draft before I go ahead and start a discussion. The whole problem I have with taxoboxes is that they are wikitables masquerading as an infobox. I understand that it is an intricate system, and my attempt would be to make it less so. SWinxy (talk) 17:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
{{Taxobox/core}}
is what produces the display for all kinds of taxobox, manual or automated. It uses a table withclass="infobox biota"
. Infoboxes are tables, whether produced via wikitext syntax or via constructed HTML. Anyway, absolutely do not attempt to change one of the drivers of{{Taxobox/core}}
in a way that bypasses it. This would be very, very undesirable, since consistency is vital and all taxobox-wide changes are made by changing{{Taxobox/core}}
. It could doubtless be altered to use Module:Infobox, but{{Taxobox/core}}
has many special cases and checks – what would actually be gained? Peter coxhead (talk) 08:16, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- I think you should either use Draft space pages, pages in your own user space or create "sandbox2" pages to make drastic changes to such key templates. Otherwise you block other users from testing minor changes in the sandboxes. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:11, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hey Peter. In case you haven't noticed, {{Taxobox}} has two sandboxes (/sandbox and /sanxbox2). I am using the sandbox for it's intended purpose, and I am not blocking anyone from using the other sandbox. Sandboxes are for experimentation, big or small. You reverting my testing is disruptive to that experimentation, so I have to ask you to please stop. In short, my effort is to make a module that will encompass manual and automated taxoboxes so it's more contained and less spaghetti monster. I will explain further the issues and such on the taxobox talk page, but that is for later. Getting me to explain everything now when it's not done is like demanding an airplane designer to give over early prototype sketches to use for the flight manual, then getting upset when dozens of planes crash. SWinxy (talk) 18:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- Infoboxes are also Wikitables so that difference isn't particularly important. The reason the taxoboxes don't use the infobox infrastructure is that taxoboxes were created earlier.
- As for why discussion first is worthwhile, it can avoid wasted effort. Converting templates used on hundreds of thousands of pages must done with caution and needs to allow for all variants. There is already a prototype module for taxoboxes (Module:Biota infobox) and it is currently used for a small subset of taxoboxes (e.g. {{paraphyletic group}}, {{population taxobox}}, {{hybridbox}}). — Jts1882 | talk 10:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- I think you should either use Draft space pages, pages in your own user space or create "sandbox2" pages to make drastic changes to such key templates. Otherwise you block other users from testing minor changes in the sandboxes. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:11, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Important Notice
![]() | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place{{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
— TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 18:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
help me to improve my work
- Hello Mr SWinxy. Thanks for your clarification. I'm new here, trying to do something , according to my media experience in my area, to highlight the sports community here. I was very surprised that there are questionable sources and good sources. Can you point to me the good sources for this? I would like to write about the sports teams in my area since they are just starting out i tried to add these sources because the article in english, could arabic sources work on english articles?