Requests for permissions |
---|
This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, template editor rights and AutoWikiBrowser access. Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups". Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests. |
Permissions
Handled here
- Account creator ( • view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
- Autopatrolled ( • view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
- AutoWikiBrowser ( • view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
- Confirmed ( • view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
- Event coordinator ( • view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
- Extended confirmed ( • view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
- File mover ( • view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
- Mass message sender ( • view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
- New page reviewer ( • view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
- Page mover ( • view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
- Pending changes reviewer ( • view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
- Rollback ( • view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
- Template editor ( • view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.
Handled elsewhere
Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:
- Administrator and bureaucrat access: Requests for administrator or bureaucrat access need to be posted at requests for adminship and requests for bureaucratship, respectively.
- Bots: Request for bot flags should be made at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval.
- Edit filter: Requests for access to the edit filter manager group and the edit filter helper group should be made at Wikipedia:Edit filter noticeboard.
- Interface administrator: Requests for interface administrator access should be made at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard. Only current administrators may become interface administrators.
- IP-block-exempt: While the IP-block-exempt right can be granted by administrators, this flag is not handled here. Requests for the IP-block exempt right should be submitted via the Unblock Ticket Request System or, if there are significant privacy concerns, email the checkuser team at checkuser-en-wp
wikipedia.org or contact a CheckUser directly.
- Checkuser and Oversight: These rights are only granted by the Arbitration Committee, and only after strict scrutiny. More information can be found here.
- AfC reviewer: This access is granted by administrators at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants.
- Redirect autopatrol list: Addition to the list is granted by administrators at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list.
- Steward permissions can only be granted in yearly elections, and are rarely given.
- Global permissions such as global renamer, sysop, IP block exempt, rollback, etc should be made at meta:Steward requests/Global permissions.
Removal of permissions
If you wish to have any of your permission flags (except administrator) removed, you should contact an administrator. If you want your administrator flag removed, you should contact a bureaucrat.
This is not the place to request review of another user's rights. If you believe someone's actions merit removal of a permission flag, you should raise your concern at the incidents noticeboard.
The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight flags are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.
Process
Requestors
To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.
Any editor may comment on requests for permission.
Administrators
Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.
Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.
Current requests
Account creator
- ( • view requests)
Autopatrolled
- ( • view requests)
User:Zacmh
- Zacmh (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Has created 106 articles, only one has been deleted I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- I've reviewed your last 10 pages. They were all stubs and it is not possible to assess an editor's capability based on that. Have you written articles with more substance, User:Zacmh? If so, could you please link to them in a reply? Schwede66 09:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
AutoWikiBrowser
- ( • view requests)
User:Rathfelder
- Rathfelder (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Categorising Rathfelder (talk) 17:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has AutoWikiBrowser access. — MusikBot talk 17:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Rathfelder, you already have AWB rights but your one word rationale for gain this right is pretty cryptic. Can you please consider to expand on it? (Non-administrator comment) —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 23:11, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
User:Rohini
- Rohini (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
More efficient editing and review of changes. Rohini (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
User:lol1VNIO
- Lol1VNIO (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I meet the minimum requirements for AWB and have reviewed the abovementioned guide. I have experience dealing with editing tools such as Huggle, Twinkle and RedWarn. Edits I will make with AWB include typo fixes, curly quotation fixes and mass-short description additions to a category (roads for example). When I get AWB, I will not gain experience through trial and error, but rather I would read the user manual for every new button I want to click. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 22:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed
- ( • view requests)
User:Dipper Dalmatian
- Dipper Dalmatian (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
There’s an anonymous user manually reverting edits on Wiggly, Wiggly Christmas. They show no signs of stopping, as their edits makes the section too wordy. The section in question is about a display of the poster for the video release at the Powerhouse Museum in Sydney. The section has been changed so much that it’s starting to get annoying. Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 08:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot talk 08:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Dipper Dalmatian: Did you want to report the issue to WP:Requests for page protection? —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 09:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- I've just submitted a page protection request. Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 01:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Event coordinator
- ( • view requests)
User:Kaizenify
- Kaizenify (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I'm an experienced editor and a trainer within the Wikimedia movement in Nigeria. Presently conducting a training now and realized that I no longer have access to the tool and hence need it back to help with my facilitation process. I used to have the tool and have never in any way abused it. Thanks Kaizenify (talk) 08:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 08:10, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Extended confirmed
- ( • view requests)
File mover
- ( • view requests)
Mass message sender
- ( • view requests)
New page reviewer
- ( • view requests)
User:Paradise Chronicle
- Paradise Chronicle (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I have received the NPP rights for one month a bit less than one month ago on the 27 August by Rosguill. So far I believe I am doing well. Now the October backlog drive message came out and I'd also like to take part in that one, so I am applying for the renewal of the NPP userrights.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 22:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Things seem to be in order, but i'm concerned about the lack of deletion experience with NPP as it seems you are mostly only approving well built articles. I'm going to
extend for another month in the hope that we can see some further development in that area. -- Amanda (she/her) 05:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Sideswipe9th
- Sideswipe9th (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I'd like to request a temporary extension of my probationary period with the new page reviewer rights. I received the message on my talk page yesterday about the October backlog drive and I'd like to participate in it. However my current permission expires at 00:00, 6 October 2022 (UTC) so I'd only be able to participate for the first week without an extension. Thanks. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 6 October 2022 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 19:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- You still have another week and yet have barely touched your userrights for the past month. I'd like to see some more contributions before the 6th that show you know what is going on before I grant another month. Feel free to rerequest and ping me before the 6th.
Not done -- Amanda (she/her) 05:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- The patrols so far look good, so extended for another month. Femke (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- That was a mistake, meant to respond to the next editor. I'm very sorry. Femke (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- If you don't object @AmandaNP, I'm would like to not revoke this. Apologies for the mistake again. Since your last comment, there have been a few additional patrols that look good, even if it's still just below the level I'd like to see for a temporary extension. A backlog drive is a good learning experience, given the systemic rereviews. Femke (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Femke: I won't revoke it, but I would ask you keep an eye on them every once in a while because of the long granting period, as the patrols are not at their peak imo. -- Amanda (she/her) 11:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
User:JML1148
- JML1148 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I am applying again for the role after my 1-month probationary period expired. I have done some work as a patroller, and expect to be more active in the future compared to this month, as I have been on holiday and taken wikibreaks. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 04:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 04:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) User has made only 751 mainspace edits in 12 months since registering and has made only 11 reviews this month (September). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- As I stated earlier, I have been on holiday and taken breaks from Wikipedia for much of this month, and my intention is to be more active on NPP if my request is approved. In the four days of August that I was a new page reviewer, I made 19 reviews, which is in the region of the number of page reviews I would like to do in that timeframe. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 08:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Gabriel601
- Gabriel601 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Have been on Wikipedia for years with little knowledge back then about the “article for creation” which although I had little issue while creating up articles in year the 2021, December. Ever since then, I choose to made up my mind following @Liz advice on my talk page which has really built up my editing skills over the months. Sometimes I do patrol pages checking to see if they suit to be on Wikipedia by making sure they meets the General notability guidelines at first and not promotional as well, if not I have to nominate for an AFD for other editors opinion using the Twinkle tool. I’m requesting for the New page reviewer right because I know what it takes to accept or decline an article. Regardless, I’m a good faith editor and wish to see the platform more greater. Gabrielt@lk 01:51, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 140 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 02:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Not done. Thanks for your enthusiasm. NPP reviewing requires an excellent understanding of Wikipedia's WP:notability criteria, and given the comments on your talk page, you still have quite some learning to do. I'd suggest you continue contributing to AfD discussions, and ensure that articles you write all meet GNG, as a starting point. Femke (talk) 08:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Well understood, thanks for your response --Gabriel (talk to me ) 11:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
User:IndyNotes
- IndyNotes (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I am applying after completing and graduating from the rigors of WP:NPP school (thanks to Atsme) and graduated. You can see the course completion here. I have been active on Wikipedia for nearly five years and look forward to assisting with NPP.--IndyNotes (talk) 13:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 358 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 13:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- I fully endorse IndyNotes after working with him (a retired high school history teacher) in a rather lengthy and difficult NPP training course in which they demonstrated all the necessary skills to be a quality reviewer. Training began 2022-08-23 and was completed 2022-10-05. Atsme 💬 📧 13:52, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Page mover
- ( • view requests)
User:Ljgua124
- Ljgua124 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I am requesting page mover access to avoid having to continue to request 'round robin' page moves in perpetuity. I have been a registered editor for 15 years, have performed ~8000 edits, have participated in and moved pages according to the guidelines and have no behavioural blocks/3RR violations. Ljgua124 (talk) 10:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm leaning towards declining this one, primarily due to lack of need. There are a few RM/TR requests in recent history, but I'm not seeing much in the way of RM participation or moves that required suppression of a redirect (recognising this last one is not why the request is being made). Plus, only a half-dozen moves made this year. Will leave this open for a bit more (primarily due to tenure) in case other admins have opinions. Primefac (talk) 11:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
- ( • view requests)
User:Daveout
- Daveout (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Can I have the ability to accept pending changes, please? I used to "unofficially" accept uncontroversial pending changes for some time now by "double reverting" the edit, but this isn't working anymore. What I mainly do here is copyedit and fight vandalism. –Daveout
(talk) 18:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Gabriel601
- Gabriel601 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Have always been on the watch regarding inappropriate edits made on pages, inappropriate reliable source added to pages & vandalism. My main field are on the WikiProject Africa and WikiProject Nigeria but as from time to time I do randomly look towards other pages. I would love to support other editors who have been in this task journey to make wikipedia a better community in accepting what is right & rejecting what is not right. Gabrielt@lk 10:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Taukeerppw
- Taukeerppw (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Hello! I'm Taukeerppw. I would like to be pending changes reviewer. I have the right to rollback but I can address the pending changes backlog. I see when patrolling the recent changes page. I have been an editor for over 4 years, performed by 4000 edits and have obtained experience with reviewing articles and reverting vandalism and unconstructive edit(s) by patrolling the recent changes. I have read and am aware of the relevant guidlines on reviewing. Thanks for your consideration . Taukeerppw (talk) 20:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Jha09
- Jha09 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I have been on Wikipedia for quite some time and actively trying to make this a better space. I have had made many edits majorly in the entertainment space. I have tried my best to add useful inputs and remove destructive edits. I have also made various wikipedia pages that have been reviewed successfully by fellow editors. I request for the following as it will mke the pending work easy and would help me make and improve pages to a better version.
Hope you find me useful for the work. Thank you!! Jha09 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:35, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 10:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Mlkj
- Mlkj (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I've started doing some rollbacking again after a few years of inactivity. I'm starting to have a pretty good understanding of vandalism, copyvio, BLP issues, and the content policy in general. I've read the guide and tips. Requesting the pending change reviewer bit to try contributing in an adjacent area. Mlkj (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Rollback
- ( • view requests)
User:Yarrowfes21
- Yarrowfes21 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Yarrowfes21 (talk) 19:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Despite being on the site for 2 months, I have been capable of detecting suspicious edits being made on articles I frequently visit. I can distinguish between false edits and legitimate edits based on the correct sources being published alongside the edit.
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 19:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Noting that after I let you know three days ago to warn users after undoing vandalism, you've still failed to do so. DatGuyTalkContribs 22:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Nush1125
- Nush1125 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I have been on Wikipedia for quite some time and actively trying to make this a better space. My fields of interest have been majorly history and I have done much work on pages like Mariam-uz-Zamani, and Khusrao Mirza while trying to protect pages relating to historic figures against vandalism. There are a ginormous amount of pages that are subjected to vandalism frequently however manually my bandwidth decreases to restore them to their references and correct piece of information. I would for this very purpose, to protect such pages against vandalism, would like to be granted access to the rollback. Thank you Nush1125 (talk) 20:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
User:Satrar
- Satrar (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I am trying to act as per Wikipedia's policies against vandalism and sock puppetry. If administrators consider me worthy of granting these rights, I will be grateful.-- Satrar (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
User:BlueNoise
- BlueNoise (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Hello. I am requesting the permission for rollback as it would make contributing to Wikipedia in the aspect of reverting vandalism a lot less difficult. Thank you. BlueNoise (talk) 22:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
User:Blazin777
- Blazin777 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I have been working to revert vandalism for some time now, mostly patrolling Recent changes. I have used Twinkle and RedWarn to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Rollback rights would make it easier for me to revert obvious vandalism. Blazin777 (talk) 00:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
User:ToastGuard
- ToastGuard (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I frequently go on recent changes patrols and practice anti-vandalism. It would be very helpful to have rollback as it would streamline the process of reverting vandalism. I plan on join the CVU mentorship program. Toast (talk) 17:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
User:IndyNotes
- IndyNotes (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I seek to continue my increasing involvement with Wikipedia and, in particular, countering vandalism.--IndyNotes (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC) IndyNotes (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
User:Wesoree
- Wesoree (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I have started reverting vandalism since April 2022. As I plan on continuing to have faster tools to revert, such as rb, tw, and rw, I wish to have rb for faster revert times and so I can continue to do good things to Wikipedia as a whole. Wesoree (Talk) 17:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
User:Aknip
- Aknip (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Requesting rollback perms because I have attempted (and sometimes failed, i may admit) to counter-vandalize. Aknip (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 30 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 19:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Template editor
- ( • view requests)