- For other types of questions, see Help:Contents and Are you in the right place? If you have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page.
- Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
- We are all volunteers, so sometimes replies can take some time. Please be patient. Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.
- If you need real-time help, you can join our IRC help channel, #wikipedia-en-help.
- If you are a new editor, you might prefer to ask your question at the Teahouse, an area specifically for new users to get help with editing, article creation and general Wikipedia use, in a friendly environment.
- Remember to sign your post by adding four tildes (
~~~~
) at the end of your post. Alternatively, you can click on the signature icon () on the edit toolbar.
October 10
Help reference for dignitaries at Opening Ceremony Athens 2004
I need help I put in the references about dignitaries to attend the opening Ceremony of the Games of the XXVIII Olympiad, Athens 2004 the Olympic Homecoming on August 13, 2004. Can you fix it and make it correct? 100.2.114.167 (talk) 03:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Mistake by WIKIPEDIA in an article on Mulayan Singh Yadav's death
Please correct the year of death.. it is mentioned as 3022 instead of 2022..
14 hours ago — Mulayam Singh Yadav (22 November 1939 – 3022) was an Indian politician and the founder-patron of the Samajwadi Party. He served for three non-consecutive 103.5.135.70 (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's already been fixed... 14 hours ago. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 04:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
A quick question
Hello! Say I found a userpage where someone entered their birth date, and their name. Would that be under the criteria for requesting a revdel? Thanks. BlueNoise (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- If the user added the information themselves using their account and they aren't what would be considered a minor, then it most likely isn't a problem. If another account added the information, then it could be a problem depending on who added it and why they added. For example, it's possible that a user added the information themselves using an IP account for some reason. If the information was added by someone other than the user, the user is still an active and they haven't removed the information, then it most likely isn't a problem or at least not something that the user is worried about. For minors, a bit more caution may be needed. If you come across someone claiming to be a minor posting personal information on their user page, you might want to email WP:OVERSIGHT and let them know. If there's a problem, an oversighter will take care of it; if there's not, they will leave the page as is. Someone might be pretending to be a minor, but there's no way of knowing for sure since there's really no required age for editing Wikipedia. If you're not, sure emailing OVERSIGHT is probably the best thing to do. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
can't add bullet
The T-14 Armata next-generation Russian main battle tank
fair use. Teaching education research culturally historically aesthetically significant. Military Channel J (talk) 09:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Military Channel J: Wikipedia rules are stricter than fair use. All the criteria at WP:NFCC must be met. RudolfRed (talk) 17:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Salim Abdool Karim
I recently edited the page for Salim Abdool Karim, and all my changes have been reverted. I used citations, links and references, all credible information. Please assist with this. Nikita Devnarain (talk) 09:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Nikita Devnarain As noted by the editor in the edit log, your edits were removed mainly because autobiographies are not an acceptable source. Wikipedia is primarily interested in what independent reliable sources say about a topic, not what they say about themselves. A secondary reason it was removed it because you copied it from another location- content should be in your own words, and though you used public domain information in this case, in general copying content from elsewhere is a copyright violation, see WP:COPYVIO. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Requested move
What's the process of requesting a page move on the English Wikipedia? Thanks. 12u (talk) 10:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- 12u This is requested at Requested Moves. If you think it will be completely uncontroversial, you can go directly there, but if you think anyone at all may object, you should first hold a discussion on the article talk page. Please also be aware of WP:COMMONNAME. 331dot (talk) 10:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- To add to that, if you think the move will be uncontroversial and the title you're trying to move to does not exist yet, you can actually perform the move yourself. If you for some reason can't, you can post to Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. For moves that may be controversial, you should post on the talk page using the template {{subst:Requested move}}. Madeline (part of me) 10:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @331dot; @Maddy from Celeste: Thanks to the both of you for your kind help. I do actually have access to perform the move myself, however I do see that the move could be controversial and I therefore wanted to hold a discussion first. I have now successfully requested the move on the article's talk page. 12u (talk) 10:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- To add to that, if you think the move will be uncontroversial and the title you're trying to move to does not exist yet, you can actually perform the move yourself. If you for some reason can't, you can post to Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. For moves that may be controversial, you should post on the talk page using the template {{subst:Requested move}}. Madeline (part of me) 10:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
images
can images count as sources 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 10:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Not really. Can you give a specific example on what text you'd like to add to what article based on what image? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- it's copyrighted 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 10:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- and i'd like to say stagecoach operate caetano levante whn i can find lots of images but almost no reputable text surces 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 10:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @2006toyotacorrola "Stagecoach operate caetano levante" is confusing. What is it supposed to mean? David10244 (talk) 03:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- and i'd like to say stagecoach operate caetano levante whn i can find lots of images but almost no reputable text surces 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 10:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- it's copyrighted 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 10:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, they can in principle, but it's not very often that it will work. First, like any other source, the image must have been reliably published. If the image is just somewhere on the internet, then it is not a reliable source, and cannot be used. Second, there aren't many kinds of information that can be satisfactorily verified by an image. A photo that shows two identifiable people is probably evidence that they were in each others' company at least once, but probably not that either of them was present at some particular event, unless there is solid visual evidence for the event in the picture.
- In your case, you are wanting to verify that Stagecoach Group operate Salvador Caetano's "Levante" model of bus, and I'm guessing that you want to do so by citing an image of a Levante bus in Stagecoach livery. I think the answer is "maybe". If it's on Caetano's website, then it is probably to be classed as reliable, but not independent. There is also the question of whether the information (that S operate CLs) is encyclopaedic, if you can't find any textual statement of it anywhere. ColinFine (talk) 04:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I can only find it on sites such as bustimes.org and [1] 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 06:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- In text but i can find plenty on flickr 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 06:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- @2006toyotacorrola ColinFine's comment that the information might not be encyclopedic is a hint that possibly, the information doesn't actually need to be included in the article. Then the question of sourcing won't come up. Of course, his hint is not an absolute ban on you trying to get the info there. David10244 (talk) 05:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- In text but i can find plenty on flickr 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 06:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I can only find it on sites such as bustimes.org and [1] 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 06:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Baptism record as source for birth
Before civil record keeping, baptism records tend to be the only source for estimating when and where someone was born. In the overwhelming majority of cases, someone baptised in Example Village on 10 October 1770 would have been born in Example Village a few days earlier, but this is impossible to prove. (In some cases, the mother may have stayed elsewhere - perhaps with relatives - at the time of a child's birth, or the baptism may not have followed closely on the birth.)
Can baptism records be used on Wikipedia to state when and where someone was born? As a case in point, the article William Shakespeare states he was born in Stratford-upon-Avon but does not cite a source; we only know he was baptised there. Ni'jluuseger (talk) 12:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- See WP:RSPRIMARY. It is rarely wise to use baptismal records as Wikipedia sources at all. We much prefer to cite secondary sources, written by subject-matter experts, since they are more likely to have the skills and knowledge necessary to correctly interpret such material. As for Shakespeare's place of birth, if it is unsourced, you should probably raise the matter on the article talk page. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- It does cite a source, [2] p24, but all it says is "baptised", which can be read as Schoenbaum agreeing with you. @Xover, should we rewrite? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- If absolutely needed I can probably scare up a few hundred sources to say he was born in Stratford-upon-Avon, and most likely in the birthplace (rather than in the neighbouring wool-shop; do you want the speculation as to which room he was born in? `Cause I can probably scare that up for you too. Just sayin'…). But this fact just simply is not in dispute, which is why we're citing Schoenbaum for the date (with all its subtleties) rather than the place.But you probably don't want to use Shakespeare as an example: over 400 years of accumulated and accelerating scholarship makes him unique, and it is highly unlikely you'll find anyone whose biography is so well attested (not even Jesus). So for any real case (for which Shakespeare is here being used as a hypothetical) you'll need to assess the actual facts. Is there secondary sourcing? Are the sources high-quality and reliable? Do they address the relevant question (place or date of birth) directly? Do they address the baptismal records directly? Are there controversies or complicating circumstances that merit extra caution (someone travelling at the time of birth may be baptised much later and in a different place; or small parishes may see children baptised in a neighbouring parish out of convenience or similar; etc.)?Baptismal records are certainly primary sources and must be used on their own with caution, but so long as they are mediated through a secondary source of at least minimally acceptable quality, and absent actual causes for controversy, relying on them for basic facts such as the date and the fact the birth almost certainly happened in the parish in which the baptism took place is uncontroversial. "Could theoretically have happened" is a far cry from "significant doubt"; we just don't want random Wikipedia editors making that call themselves based on the primary sources. Xover (talk) 15:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Case in point: the first bardbio I checked—Smith, Emma. The Cambridge Shakespeare Guide (2019). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press—says
William Shakespeare was born in Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire in April 1564 …
, and then dives into a discussion of the trouble of pinning down the date (all subsequent scholars rely on Schoenbaum for that, incidentally; our use of him as the source for this in the article here was not accidental). Xover (talk) 15:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)- That's all well and good, but does it say he was English!!?? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure we actually had that fight too, somewhere down in the deep archives. Though that might have been someone objecting to referring to him as British (English nationalism is a thing—for some reason—and there are traces of that fight strewn all over the project; now also exported to Wikidata short descriptions). And then there's the revision history of Kenneth Branagh: is he a British actor of Irish descent? An Irish actor? Just a plain British actor? *sigh* Xover (talk) 21:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- So we have the interesting circumstance that while no primary source may exist that states incontrovertibly that X was born in Y, when one or more reputable secondary sources are satisfied (based on their assessment of the primary sources) that X can be reasonably stated to have been born in Y (because baptised there, perhaps among other reasons), then Wikipedia can go with that secondary source, and it's not our problem that the primary sources don't literally prove when or where someone was born.
- I see Shakespeare proved an excellent example to kindle some thinking about this, and I see Shakespeare's Birthplace duly says it's the house "where it is believed that William Shakespeare was born". William Shakespeare, on the contrary, states the place of birth as though known fact, though that may be based on good secondary sources doing the same, which makes it cool for Wikipedia. Ni'jluuseger (talk) 04:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- That's an apt summary. We cannot, in general, decide we do not want to follow the secondary sources based on our own assessment of the primary sources. They are the experts that can assess whether the evidence is sufficient for whatever conclusion. Xover (talk) 06:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I can imagine the fun of a centuries-long controversy, along the lines of the authorship question, as to whether Shakespeare was actually born - not just baptised - in Stratford, or whether the family happened to be holidaying in Cornwall at the time, etc. Ni'jluuseger (talk) 08:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- That can be fun, yes. Let me give you this quote from a different article: "Scholars Oliver Rackham and Peter Roberts have suggested that the age on the painting does not match Marlowe's age. They argue that ætatis suæ 21 means "in his 21st year", i.e. aged 20; which, combined with Marlowe's baptism date of February 1563 in the old style dates used at the time, would require the sitter to be at least a year younger than Marlowe."
- On topic though, I doubt any scholars have spent much time thinking beyond "His mum lived in Stratford, so absent records to the contrary, there's no reason to speculate on her having him elsewhere." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hey, scholars have to keep busy! And yeah, absent atomic proof, Occam's razor obtains and it's pointless to speculate whether WS might have been born - if not at the holiday home in Cornwall - in Wilmcote, at a stone's throw from Stratford, where his mother was being cared for by rellies during her pregnancy, this never having been recorded anywhere. Even if it's perfectly possible, tee-hee. Ni'jluuseger (talk) 09:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I can imagine the fun of a centuries-long controversy, along the lines of the authorship question, as to whether Shakespeare was actually born - not just baptised - in Stratford, or whether the family happened to be holidaying in Cornwall at the time, etc. Ni'jluuseger (talk) 08:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- That's an apt summary. We cannot, in general, decide we do not want to follow the secondary sources based on our own assessment of the primary sources. They are the experts that can assess whether the evidence is sufficient for whatever conclusion. Xover (talk) 06:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure we actually had that fight too, somewhere down in the deep archives. Though that might have been someone objecting to referring to him as British (English nationalism is a thing—for some reason—and there are traces of that fight strewn all over the project; now also exported to Wikidata short descriptions). And then there's the revision history of Kenneth Branagh: is he a British actor of Irish descent? An Irish actor? Just a plain British actor? *sigh* Xover (talk) 21:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- That's all well and good, but does it say he was English!!?? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Case in point: the first bardbio I checked—Smith, Emma. The Cambridge Shakespeare Guide (2019). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press—says
- If absolutely needed I can probably scare up a few hundred sources to say he was born in Stratford-upon-Avon, and most likely in the birthplace (rather than in the neighbouring wool-shop; do you want the speculation as to which room he was born in? `Cause I can probably scare that up for you too. Just sayin'…). But this fact just simply is not in dispute, which is why we're citing Schoenbaum for the date (with all its subtleties) rather than the place.But you probably don't want to use Shakespeare as an example: over 400 years of accumulated and accelerating scholarship makes him unique, and it is highly unlikely you'll find anyone whose biography is so well attested (not even Jesus). So for any real case (for which Shakespeare is here being used as a hypothetical) you'll need to assess the actual facts. Is there secondary sourcing? Are the sources high-quality and reliable? Do they address the relevant question (place or date of birth) directly? Do they address the baptismal records directly? Are there controversies or complicating circumstances that merit extra caution (someone travelling at the time of birth may be baptised much later and in a different place; or small parishes may see children baptised in a neighbouring parish out of convenience or similar; etc.)?Baptismal records are certainly primary sources and must be used on their own with caution, but so long as they are mediated through a secondary source of at least minimally acceptable quality, and absent actual causes for controversy, relying on them for basic facts such as the date and the fact the birth almost certainly happened in the parish in which the baptism took place is uncontroversial. "Could theoretically have happened" is a far cry from "significant doubt"; we just don't want random Wikipedia editors making that call themselves based on the primary sources. Xover (talk) 15:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
WP:ONEOTHER deletions
Can disambiguation pages, failing per WP:ONEOTHER be deleted per WP:CSD#G14 or do we need to start an AfD? Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 15:58, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- You could tag them as G14, but that would be for the discovering admin to deal with. I usually chuck them to WP:MFD as they aren't articles. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: What do you think about Non-cooperation movement (disambiguation)? —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 20:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
White-on-transparent logos
Hi all, I was thinking of uploading the logo of The Trevor Project. However, on their website, the logo is a file with white foreground and transparent background, always displayed on another couloured background. I was wondering what I can do about this when uploading to Wikipedia. Would it for example be permissible to invert the colours, or add a coloured background to the file itself? Madeline (part of me) 16:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Maddy from Celeste: I just added the logo with the tangerine background that shows up when you Google them and select images. See The Trevor Project TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 21:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Asking for closing an AfD
I can't close an AfD in which I voted but can I ask someone who didn't to do it? Dr Salvus 16:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- for this you would have to go to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for help as only they can close them. Tdshe/her 16:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- I think WP:RFCL would be a better choice. And non-admins can close afd:s. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
donation to wiki
Hello there, Received an email from Jimmy wales about donation, need more info. How to speak to someone to find details... Buyersellerasia (talk) 21:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Buyersellerasia: For questions about fundraising, contact please email donate(@)wikimedia.org RudolfRed (talk) 21:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- And would like to mention, the Wikimedia Foundation does not need your donations at all. They already have more than 200 million sitting in the bank. Sungodtemple (talk) 21:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, if they have so much money, when every time i visit a page, a pop up windows show up and they cry not to leave without donating $$$$...? Buyersellerasia (talk) 21:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Buyersellerasia: If you go into preferences, you can disable the fundraising banners. RudolfRed (talk) 21:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, if they have so much money, when every time i visit a page, a pop up windows show up and they cry not to leave without donating $$$$...? Buyersellerasia (talk) 21:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
How to stop haters from flagging and trying to delete my page
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Since the OP has been indefinitely blocked, there's not much more that can be done here at the Help Desk to help them with this. Further comments could be made on the OPs user talk page, but right now the main focus of the OP should be WP:UNBLOCK and not about things related any articles or drafts. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:56, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Good day to all of you, My question is how to stop or block the haters who like to see your pages deleted or flagged. I just got my page up only 4/5 days and already got a hater. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Buyersellerasia (talk) 21:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Buyersellerasia: Which article? Your draft at Draft:Kazi_Ahmed was deleted due to advertising/promotion, which is not allowed. RudolfRed (talk) 22:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- you referred to a wrong article.... Buyersellerasia (talk) 22:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Buyersellerasia: You don't. We do not care what their motivation is. We only care about whether or not an article meets the deletion criteria. Someone flagged the article as unambigous promotion. An experienced administrator agreed and deleted the article. End of story. If the admin had not agreed that it was a clear-cut case, the article would have been put through the more rigorous "articles for deletion" process and would likely have been deleted anyway. Please read WP:N. You do not seem to understand what Wikipedia is. -Arch dude (talk) 22:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- i am talking about another page... Buyersellerasia (talk) 22:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Buyersellerasia Which page? Note that only administrators can see deleted pages. Sungodtemple (talk) 22:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- I hired a freelancer and created a page for me, but already a hater is after my page and flagged it.
- Trying to get some help not only stop haters, also improve to make my wiki page even improve further. Would you be interested to help. Buyersellerasia (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Sungodtemple
- I hired a freelancer and created a page for me, but already a hater is after my page and flagged it.
- Trying to get some help not only stop haters, also improve to make my wiki page even improve further. Would you be interested to help. Buyersellerasia (talk) 22:23, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Which Wiki page? We aren't mind readers. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- We're not going to waste our time trying to improve a page that is so fundamentally flawed that it would need a complete and utter rewrite to make acceptable. Please quit trying to use Wikipedia to aggrandise yourself. (NOTE: I have tagged the article for speedy deletion as blatant and irreparable advertizing/promotion.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 22:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Buyersellerasia Which page? Note that only administrators can see deleted pages. Sungodtemple (talk) 22:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- i am talking about another page... Buyersellerasia (talk) 22:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Pretty sure this is Kazi Ahmed (inventor). Which is highly promotional. And if what Buyersellerasia says is true, also means User:Abusayeed did not identify as a paid editor. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Fixing mention. User:AbuSayeed is what I meant. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- There's also Kazi Ahmed (artist) which was deleted a few years back. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Floquenbeam
- Thank you for your feedback. I am totally new in this. How can I improve and make sure it is done with the wiki terms, so no one can flag? Please share your thoughts. Highly appreciate it. Buyersellerasia (talk) 22:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Bluntly speaking, you realistically cannot do so and nor can any mercenary writer you hire. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 22:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Well, a first step would be to stop with the insulting claim that someone who accurately tags your promotional article with a massive conflict of interest ... as an article with a conflict of interest is a "hater". But I'm not terribly interested in helping someone who is all aggressive and indignant when we don't know what page we're talking about, and all conciliatory once we figure it out. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- "Kazi Ahmed... founded Buyer Seller Asia, an online marketplace that connects South Asian manufacturers, wholesalers to the global buyers based in Singapore, and Key West, Florida" --Orange Mike | Talk 23:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- @AbuSayeed vai, creating the whole article, adding references (those were promotional refs), uploading photo, translating the article to other wikis etc is more than just "i expected to fix some issues and help him". আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 01:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Tibetan art museum
I am on the board of a small Tibetan art museum. I was reading several pages...and I would like to use some of the content (intact/without additional edits)...am I allowed to do such a thing? There were several descriptions for instance I would like to use...do I need to source the information even if I make some minor changes to the content. 2601:8C:4A81:C240:E0BC:F968:801E:61C7 (talk) 22:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- You can use any of the text, provided you give attribution. See WP:REUSE for more info. RudolfRed (talk) 23:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi IP 2601:8C:4A81:C240:E0BC:F968:801E:61C7. If you would like to use such content on other Wikipedia pages, then please also take a look at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Such things can be done, but it still needs to be done in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- By all means, feel free to use and even modify any of the text under the terms of the CC-BY-SA. Note that CC-BY-SA imposes two obligations. First, you must attribute the source. Second, you must license the resulting derived work (e.g., web page, brochure, book, etc.) under the same license. You may also use almost all of the images under the same terms, but check the license of each image separately, since we use some images under a "fair" use" rationale. You are NOT free to use those images under CC-BY-SA, and you must make your own separate determination as to whether or not you are justified in using them under a fair use rationale. As a separate issue, you are probably well qualified to help us, if you have the time. If you see a problem within Wikipedia, please fix it! You will need to cite a reliable source if you do this. If you are uncomfortable with editing a Wikipedia article, then make your suggestion for a change on the articles talk page. -Arch dude (talk) 02:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
October 11
Personal listicle in draftspace
Could you please tell me the proper action to take when I come across a draft like Draft:Songs i like? Aithus (talk) 06:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I would nominate it for speedy deletion per WP:U5. Shantavira|feed me 08:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- U5 wouldn't apply as it's not in the User namespace. WP:MFD would probably be a slam dunk though. Madeline (part of me) 10:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
categories
how can i see all uncategorised pages? 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 08:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- You could try Special:UncategorizedPages, or Category:Uncategorized pages and its subcategories if Template:Uncategorized has been added to the article. David Biddulph (talk) 08:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Website to be white listed
Hello There,
I don't know how and when did my website MarketsandMarkets.com is being blacklisted on Wikipedia. Can you please help me in identifying the issue and resolving this at earliest and make the website whitelist on Wikipedia and I would also like to add my company page on Wikipedia. Any suggestion in resolving this, would be of great help. Thanks Rraj07 (talk) 10:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Rraj07 Wikipedia does not have "company pages", not a single one. What Wikipedia does have is articles about certain companies that meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Mere existence does not merit a company an article, it depends on significant coverage in independent reliable sources; significant coverage goes beyond press releases, staff interviews, annoucements of routine activities, and the like- it goes into detail about why the company is important or influential as the source sees it(not the company itself).
- Please read conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures(paid editing includes mere employment, and declaring it is a Terms of Use requirement and mandatory). 331dot (talk) 10:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Apparently it was blacklisted back in 2015. If it wasn't your website, you could apply here to have it removed from the list, but as that page says, Requests from site owners or anyone with a conflict of interest will be declined. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 14:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
How can I get regular news
How can I get regular news updates by email? 92.22.127.41 (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- This page is for asking questions related to using Wikipedia only, it is not a general question asking forum, sorry. 331dot (talk) 11:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- IP editor. If you look at the Main page, you'll see a couple of places where you can set up automatic emails for "Featured articles" and "On this day". Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:55, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Since Wikipedia is not a news website, I assume you want news about Wikipedia itself, in which case you can subscribe to our newsletter. Shantavira|feed me 15:04, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Original lead singer for AC/DC
Wikipedia says the original singer for AC/DC was Bon Scott. Actually the original lead was Dave Evans from 1973-1974 before Bon Scott. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.52.131.243 (talk) 13:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Please direct any concerns about the AC/DC article to its talk page, Talk:AC/DC. 331dot (talk) 13:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi IP editor. The very first line in the history section says exactly that. Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Also, there's this: "AC/DC underwent several line-up changes before releasing their first album, 1975's High Voltage. Membership subsequently stabilised around the Young brothers, singer Bon Scott, drummer Phil Rudd, and bassist Mark Evans." That also does not say that Bon Scott was the original singer. David10244 (talk) 05:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
What's the template for requesting an image to be cropped?
I came across it recently, but I just cannot find it now (have spent 10-15 minutes hunting around, I should have asked here first). (And why are things so hard to find sometimes?) A bit iffy (talk) 19:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- @A bit iffy, {{Remove border}}? 199.208.172.35 (talk) 20:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, that's not the sort of cropping I'm thinking of (should have been clearer). I want to request someone to crop irrelevant people out of a group photo so as to show just one person. A bit iffy (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- You could post on Wikipedia:Graphics Lab, or c:Commons:Graphic Lab if the file is hosted on Commons. Madeline (part of me) 21:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- {{Cleanup image}} with an appropriate explanation would work; I can't find any others specifically about cropping. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 21:04, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, that's not the sort of cropping I'm thinking of (should have been clearer). I want to request someone to crop irrelevant people out of a group photo so as to show just one person. A bit iffy (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Instead of cropping an image, you can just display a region of it. I've put some examples at User:Maproom/cropping. Maproom (talk) 21:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't want to crop anything myself, I want others to do it, hence my request for that elusive template. I'm sure I saw it.--A bit iffy (talk) 18:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @A bit iffy {{CSS image crop}}? -- AxG / ✉ 21:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't want to crop anything myself, I want others to do it, hence my request for that elusive template. I'm sure I saw it.--A bit iffy (talk) 18:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @A bit iffy It may be appropriate to do what you want via a method I explained earlier today at the Teahouse. See WP:Teahouse#Help_with_cropping_CC_image_and_adding_to_infobox_of_BLP. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't want to crop anything myself, I want others to do it, hence my request for that elusive template. I'm sure I saw it.--A bit iffy (talk) 18:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- I would assume you're referring to a template similar to the template to request an image be converted to an SVG over on commons. I'll dig through templates and categories and see what I might be able to find. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't want to crop anything myself, I want others to do it, hence my request for that elusive template. I'm sure I saw it.--A bit iffy (talk) 18:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Angela Lansbury Movie Credits
You guys have a fairly comprehensive listing of her movies, but I never did see Blue Hawaii where she played a leading role in 1961? 47.220.155.3 (talk) 20:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Her role is mentioned in both Blue Hawaii and Angela Lansbury. If you have suggestions to improve the articles, you can start a discussion on that article's talk page. RudolfRed (talk) 20:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
How to unblock talk page after revoked by admin
If a user talk page was revoked by administrator due to inappropriate use, how to restore the talk page for unblock appeal. There is seem to be difficult to request even if banned by UTRS. 197.156.95.54 (talk) 21:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Which account are you talking about? Cullen328 (talk) 21:37, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I think they've had their account blocked, TPA'd and banned from UTRS and are asking what to do. Madeline (part of me) 07:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
A blocked account with indefinite expiry. 197.156.95.62 (talk) 07:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- The account you're referring to is not your own correct? If it is then you are committing block evasion. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Article in Draft and Mainspace
I initally placed this article List of geolocation-based video games into draft then the editor did some more work and moved it back to the mainspace and I redrafted it. Since then the editor has brought it up to scratch but then cut and paste the text into the mainspace. (I then had a grump on there talk page). Anyway, now both the article and draft exist but more work has been done on the article in the mainspace. Since then the editor who created the article has done some sort of further creative editing of the draft in an effort to remove it. Can you delete the draft and merge the histories? Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 21:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Hughesdarren:, please see WP:HISTMERGE#Instructions for tagging a page for history merging. Mathglot (talk) 10:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Mathglot: someone else tagged the page but it was declined for the reason "decline histmerge; single editor, no attribution issues", another user has redirected the draft. Cheers anyway. Regard. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
October 12
Help for reference of Petros Kourtis at the Opening Ceremony of Athens 2004 Olympic Games
Hi, I need help here about the reference of the ancient stadium of Olympia on the screen was Petros Kourtis the drummer at the Opening Ceremony Athens 2004 Olympics. I just update a new name as a playing drummer. The that appeared at the Countdown and Welcome in the article section. I don't know how to do it. 100.2.114.167 (talk) 14:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Cleanup template for articles that have a References section but no bibliography
Hi,
I found an article that seems to have a very extensive list of abbreviated references, but without a bibliography or any way to immediately know the full names of the sources mentioned. I was certain there was a template for this, but I can't find it. Does anyone know? *EDIT* I think it's more accurate to say notes but no references. TangoFett (talk) 09:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @TangoFett Perhaps @User:Maye Fernandez can explain. They moved the article to Mainspace in April this year and it does seem to be well-cited but missing the "sources" section. I think that the explanation is that the article is a translation from one that did have a bibliography. See es:Cultura mixteca. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- A very extensive bibliography has now been added. Thanks for the alert, TangoFett Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Notability Guidelines
Indy Hall Does this article meet the required Notability guidelines? Melancholyhelper (talk) 10:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indy Hall had no consensus for deletion. - David Biddulph (talk) 11:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
References not appearing
Is it just me or is there something odd about 2022 UCI Mountain Bike season where the references template isn't working? If not just me, do I report this as a bug? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's not just you. The templates appear normal in preview too which is weird. Madeline (part of me) 11:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, the page is too long, so they don't render properly, see Category:Pages where post-expand include size is exceeded. Madeline (part of me) 11:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Curb Safe Charmer: I have made a fix [3] which works for now. It currently uses 91% of the limit so it may break again when more events are added. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Curb Safe Charmer: If you want more room than 9% for additions and possible template changes using more resources then the currently 1973 {{flagathlete}} could be replaced with a flag icon linking the country followed by the linked athlete but no country abbreviation. This would reduce 91% to 31% if {{flagg}} is used. Many sports articles only have the linked flag icon, e.g. 2022 ATP Tour. The table would also fit better on narrow screens. I have regex to easily make all the replacements. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Curb Safe Charmer: I have made a fix [3] which works for now. It currently uses 91% of the limit so it may break again when more events are added. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, the page is too long, so they don't render properly, see Category:Pages where post-expand include size is exceeded. Madeline (part of me) 11:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
EMIDAX
Is a African rapper you wants to take his career to the next level — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.114.155.62 (talk) 16:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Do you have a question about editing Wikipedia? This is not a platform for advancing the careers of article subjects (or potential article subjects). 199.208.172.35 (talk) 16:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Am I registered with Wikipedia?
It's possible that I have registered using my E-mail address but that I have forgotten my password or user name. My E-mail address is (Redacted) 2600:8801:AF1A:4B00:E07C:C5DC:DD1F:83DC (talk) 19:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- We don't have access to email addresses associated with accounts. If you do not remember your login information, you will need to create a new account. On your new account, you can state on the user page that you had a prior account but lost access. Have you tried examining the edit histories of articles you may have edited to see if you recognize your username? 331dot (talk) 19:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Go to Special:PasswordReset and enter your email address. You will get a password reset link if there is an account linked to that email. RudolfRed (talk) 19:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Oath Keepers description
The Oath Keepers are a militia and they are strong Constitutionalists. Where’s the source for listing the group as “anti-government”?
Who does the fact checking for your organization?
If you can make this kind of mistake in a simple fact about a militia group, how can you be a trusted source for any information in general? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7080:E935:F19A:F1D4:CCDA:869B:A19 (talk) 22:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- If you look at Oath Keepers, you'll find two such sources, cited at the end of its first sentence. Maproom (talk) 22:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Eleven leading members of the Oath Keepers are now on trial for seditious conspiracy. Read what the US Justice Department says about the Oath Keepers. Cullen328 (talk) 22:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
October 13
Why is there a signature for some of these postings. ( ie the rock)
Why is there a signature ? On some of these postings ( ie Dwayne Johnson) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:CF:4780:4290:C0B5:86BE:EE04:4111 (talk) 04:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- are you looking for wikipedia:signatures or Wikipedia:Signatures of living persons? lettherebedarklight, 晚安, おやすみ, ping me when replying 04:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- If you mean why some infoboxes have an image of the handwritten signature of the subject then there has been some disagreement about it. You can search the archives of Template talk:Infobox person for "signature" to e.g. find Template talk:Infobox person/Archive 35#Signature parameter RFC. It closed with no consensus. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Changing the entity name of Burj Khalifa
Hi team,
Need your help in editing the name of Burj Khalifa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burj_Khalifa
Full name is Burj Khalifa by Emaar. How can we make this change? Umarkhandxb (talk) 05:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Umarkhandxb Please see wp:Commonname for info. David10244 (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Its own website calls it "Burj Khalifa" (not that that's relevant to Wikipedia's article naming policy). Maproom (talk) 07:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Alexander Technique wiki
I have added suggested edits in the talk section of the wiki, the article is a mess but editors don't want to change it. 68.129.197.221 (talk) 06:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- We mostly can't help you with stuff like that here; the venue for that starts and pretty much ends at the article talk page. If you can't get editors there to agree with your suggestions, you kind of have to accept that. That doesn't mean you have to give up. But suggesting a complete rewrite of any article is heavy lifting. If you could suggest (say) adding, deleting, or changing individual sentences, provide a reason, provide references, be able to defend those references as reliable, ask other editors what they think and listen to them just as you expect them to listen to you... that is a better way to move the article forward.
- You're new, and the fact that your material looks kind of like a pamphlet/handbook/advertisement for the Technique is going to put people off. It may be that the article is unbalanced and too harsh on the Technique. But even if it is, you have to convince the editors on that article's talk page, with concrete specific suggestions. And if you can't, really all you can do is roll your eyes, mutter under your breath about what a cockup Wikipedia is, and go watch the playoffs. Herostratus (talk) 07:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi IP 68.129.197.221. If your question has to do with Talk:Alexander Technique#Suggestions for desperately needed edits, then perhaps you might have a better chance of getting a response it you broke up your edit request into much smaller more easier to digest bits instead of one large wall text covering many different things. Trying focus of the one or two changes that you feel are really needed and then make an WP:EDITREQUEST for them. Trying to get lots of changes made at once (i.e. essentially have the article entirely rewritten) almost never gets a positive response because very few people are going to be willing to read through such a request and try and figure out what exactly is being asked. Instead of saying edits desparately need to be made, it's better to focus on how making them is in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Since articles about medical related topics tend to require very good sources per WP:MEDRS and WP:FRINGE, changes are often made slowly and only after being sufficiently discussed. To be honest, it would be near impossible to have a constructive discussion or establish a WP:CONSENSUS on every suggestion you're making all. Try trimming down and re-wording your request so that it's clear as to what you're asking (e.g change X to Y, add this to the section on ABC, add this citation for this sentence), it's clear why the change needs to be made in terms of relevant Wikipedia policies of guidelines, and its clear what reliable sources you're citing in support of a change. Smaller less complicated requests tend to be easier to answer and tend to be reponded to more quickly. When it comes to edit requests, less is often actually better. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
how do i view what pages i can edit?
i saw it once, then never again. where can i find it again?
michael User:Ifartedinagrandmain1992 08:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ifartedinagrandmain1992 Wikipedia allows the editing of the great bulk of articles. A very few are protected to seek to prevent vandalism. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- I guess you refer to a feature with suggested pages in a "Homepage" tab at User:Ifartedinagrandmain1992 if "Display newcomer homepage" is enabled at the bottom of Special:Preferences. PrimeHunter (talk) 09:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Best practices for extensive citations
Hi there
I'm editing the sensitive article on Stepan Bandera subject to discretionary sanctions.
The citation style is highly inconsistent and I am struggling to come up with a consistent way of salvaging it.
Currently my aim is to use references without page references but to use {{rp}} template when citing specific pages and the clumsy hash-tag template {{#tag:ref|...<ref name=":11" />|group=nb}} when citing quotations (see discussion).
I note however that currently this pushes the <ref> references all the way down the article in order to accommodate the quotations.
What are best practices for this? Also, I not that the French article on Bandera, while being much better balanced content wise, seems to have more advanced citing functionality, with citations nested in a scrollable window and proper refs listed. Jabbi (talk) 11:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- The references are going to the bottom (where they don't belong) because you made this edit where you changed
{{Reflist}}
to{{reflist|group=nb}}
. After you did that, MediaWiki does not know where to put the references list so it tags it on to the end of the rendered article. Typically, a 'Notes' section with{{reflist|group=nb}}
precedes a 'References' section with{{Reflist}}
. - —Trappist the monk (talk) 14:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @Trappist the monk:, that's helpful although I was mainly hoping to get responses about best practises in general. Is the above one of suggestion one of many ways to combine page citations and direct quotation? Is there a standard guide for this? Why are the French cooler? --Jabbi (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- I guess 'cool' is in the eye of the beholder.
- I believe, and this is me talking, not en.wiki, that quotations do not belong in citations but, rather, citations belong in quotations. If the quotation is important to the article, put it in the article body or a separate Notes section and cite it.
- It appears that only you care about the citations in that article given the dearth of comments at Talk:Stepan Bandera § Citations are a mess. That suggests that you are pretty much free to make what fixes you think appropriate. WP:CITEVAR is the rule. Of course, someone can come along later and object to your chosen style ...
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 16:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @Trappist the monk:, that's helpful although I was mainly hoping to get responses about best practises in general. Is the above one of suggestion one of many ways to combine page citations and direct quotation? Is there a standard guide for this? Why are the French cooler? --Jabbi (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Trying to update my page
I am trying to update my page, Barbara Mujica (writer). It contains outdated information and does not include my latest books and prizes. I have edited several times, but it always reverts to the old page. I have NOT written articles on bilingual education for thirty years, and my husband's position is not relevant to my career. I have written many new fiction and non-fiction books that I have not been able to add, and I have won several significant prizes, such as the GEMELA prize in 2022 for best book on early modern Hispanic women. Please allow me to update my page! BMujica (talk) 13:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, BMujica. If there are problems in a Wikipedia article about you (which is not in any way "your page" - see ownership of articles) you should not attempt to edit it directly, but you may make edit requests. See WP:AUTOPROB. ColinFine (talk) 14:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- An account (User:Mxmp2) was recently blocked for attempting to correct "misinformation" in that article and issuing various legal threats and personal attacks when reverted. @BMujica, the talk page for the article is here: Talk:Barbara Mujica (writer). If you start a discussion there, perhaps updates can be made. Please be aware that we will ask for sources to back up any information you want added. If you want unsourced information removed, that is much more easily done. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 14:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
i want to redirect all searches for my grandfather and father name to a specific place.
I want to redirect all searches for my grandfather and father name to a specific place and put their life and political history here in Wikipedia. They were politicians, both of them were Mayor and my dad was a Councilor then got voted as Mayor. How can I do that? And will Wikipedia help in writing the articles? Jason Legaspi (talk) 15:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a corporate body, it is a community of volunteers. Before you make any edits related to your father and grandfather, make sure to read WP:COI. Can you state what specifically you would like to be done? We don't know who your father is. Sungodtemple (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's important to bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a web host. In order to have an article, a person should meet WP:NPERSON. Generally speaking, Wikipedia does not have articles about most mayors or councillors because they are not notable enough. Other Wikipedians can help you when writing an article, but they cannot do all of the work for you. See your first article for more details.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- my grandfather was mayor was mayor for more than 20 years and thats notable enough for me as a part of history for the political history of the municipalty of penaranda nueva ecija and the philippines. Jason Legaspi (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- i would like to them to have their life and political accomplishment because they were mayors and councilor for 20 years and have done a lot for the municipality of penaranda, nueva ecija philippines. i would like to have the info available for the people for research about the life of my father and grand father and the political history of the municipality. Jason Legaspi (talk) 16:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Telling us what you would 'like' isn't going to make anything happen here. Any articles will only be accepted if it can be shown that the individuals concerned meet our notability guidelines, as demonstrated through significant coverage in reliable sources. And you are unlikely to find a volunteer to write such articles for you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- To provide a somewhat less grumpy (and perhaps more useful) explanation: You feel--sincerely--that your father and grandfather are historically worthy of note. You might very well be right. You're hoping that writing them up in Wikipedia will provide them with the notability that they deserve. But that's not the way Wikipedia is. Wikipedia does not host articles to MAKE someone notable--no matter how much that person might deserve it. Wikipedia notes people who have already achieved notability. Wikipedia is not meant to be the first place where someone is written about; it really should be among the last. Uporządnicki (talk) 17:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @ Jason Legaspi I'd also like, in a friendly way, to point this out. Your municipality Peñaranda has an article in Wikipedia. (So does its province Nueva Ecija, and the article makes it look like a place I'd love to visit.) However, even the current mayor, while he is named in the article, does not have his own article. Uporządnicki (talk) 17:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- To provide a somewhat less grumpy (and perhaps more useful) explanation: You feel--sincerely--that your father and grandfather are historically worthy of note. You might very well be right. You're hoping that writing them up in Wikipedia will provide them with the notability that they deserve. But that's not the way Wikipedia is. Wikipedia does not host articles to MAKE someone notable--no matter how much that person might deserve it. Wikipedia notes people who have already achieved notability. Wikipedia is not meant to be the first place where someone is written about; it really should be among the last. Uporządnicki (talk) 17:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Telling us what you would 'like' isn't going to make anything happen here. Any articles will only be accepted if it can be shown that the individuals concerned meet our notability guidelines, as demonstrated through significant coverage in reliable sources. And you are unlikely to find a volunteer to write such articles for you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- It's important to bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a web host. In order to have an article, a person should meet WP:NPERSON. Generally speaking, Wikipedia does not have articles about most mayors or councillors because they are not notable enough. Other Wikipedians can help you when writing an article, but they cannot do all of the work for you. See your first article for more details.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Typo in wikipedia page "Russian Revolution", as well as issues with account.
The page "Russian Revolution" has a typo: "A semi-capitalist country would suffice amd Russia had a working class base of 5% of the population."
On top of this typo, I have discovered that the edits I have made using the same account on my mobile phone are not showing up as edits made on this account. Is there any particular reason why, or is this just a bug? SakuraEditor (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Done, fixed the typo Cmr08 (talk) 16:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @SakuraEditor: Saved edits on any device show up on the same account if you are logged in when you save. Most pages can be edited without being logged in. This post is the only edit by your account at the English Wikipedia. Special:CentralAuth/SakuraEditor shows some edits at other wikis with the same owner and account system. There are also thousands of independent wikis which don't share accounts with us, e.g. Fandom. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Heather Campbell and Heather Anne Campbell
Hi there. I'm a big fan of Wikipedia and have contributed financially over the years. I'm on disability and have a lot of free time on my hands, so I read Wikipedia a LOT.
I just wanted to signal to you that you have a profile for Heather Campbell and Heather Anne Campbell, who are two different persons. However the text in their profiles is the same. Not sure which one it applies to.
Bye for now! 107.171.227.121 (talk) 18:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking. Heather Campbell is a redirect that will take you to the article Heather Anne Campbell RudolfRed (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- RudolfRed, there seem to be two people, Heather Campbell (Wikidata Q110660275) and Heather Anne Campbell (Wikidata Q5693722) with different IMDb pages, so having a redirect from Heather Campbell to the article Heather Anne Campbell is probably unhelpful. TSventon (talk) 19:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)