This page is for listing and discussing possible copyright problems involving text on Wikipedia, including pages suspected to be copyright violations. Listings typically remain for at least five days before review and closure by a copyright problems clerk or administrator. During this time, interested contributors are invited to offer feedback about the problem at the relevant talk page, propose revisions to the material, or request copyright permission. After the listing period, a copyright problems clerk or administrator will review the listing and take further action if necessary.
Pages listed for copyright review appear in the bottom section of the page. The top includes information for people who have copyright concerns about pages or images, and for community volunteers who'd like to help resolve concerns.
To add a new listing, please go to . Instructions for dealing with copyright concerns can be found at Instructions for dealing with text-based copyright concerns.
Handling previously published text on Wikipedia
Under the United States law that governs Wikipedia, copyright is automatically assumed as soon as any content (text or other media) is created in a physical form. An author does not need to apply for or claim copyright, for a copyright to exist.
Only one of the following allows works to be reused in Wikimedia projects:
A) Explicit Statement. An explicit statement (by the author, or by the holder of the rights to the work) that the material is either:
- in the public domain,
- licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA), or
- otherwise compatible with CC-BY-SA.
B) Public Domain. If the work is inherently in the public domain, due to its age, source or lack of originality; or
C) Fair Use. United States law allows for fair use of copyrighted content, and (within limits) Wikipedia does as well. Under guidelines for non-free content, brief selections of copyrighted text may be used, but only if clearly marked and with full attribution.
Even if a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, material should be properly attributed in accordance with Wikipedia:Plagiarism in respect of local customs and attribution requirements of compatible licenses. If the terms of the compatible license are not met, use of the content can constitute a violation of copyright even if the license is compatible.
Repeated copyright violations
Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted text or images may be subject to contributor copyright investigations, to ensure the removal from the project of all copyright infringement. Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material after appropriate warnings will be blocked from editing, to protect the project; see 17 United States Code § 512.
Backwards copying: when Wikipedia had (or may have had) it first
In some instances, it is clear that two pieces of text (one on Wikipedia, and one elsewhere) are copies of each other, but not clear which piece is the original and which is the copy. "Compliant" sites that copy Wikipedia text note that they have done so, but not all of our re-users are compliant.
If you've found such a case, you might first check the discussion page to see if a note has been added to the top of the talk page to allay people's concerns. If not, you can look for clues. Do other pages in the other website copy other Wikipedia articles? Did the content show up on Wikipedia all in one piece, placed by a single editor? If you don't see good evidence that Wikipedia had it first, it's a good idea to bring it up for investigation. You might follow the Instructions for listing below or tag the article {{copy-paste|url=possible source}}
so that others can evaluate.
If you confirm definitely that the content was on Wikipedia first, please consider adding {{backwardscopy}} to the article's talk page with an explanation of how you know. If you see an article somewhere else which was copied from Wikipedia without attribution, you might visit the CC-BY-SA compliance page or Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks. There are well-documented cases of plagiarism from Wikipedia by external publications.
Instructions for dealing with text-based copyright concerns
Blatant infringement
Pages exhibiting blatant copyright infringements may be speedily deleted if:
- Content was copied from a source which does not have a license compatible with Wikipedia, and was not copied from a mirror source.
- The page can neither be restored to a previous revision without infringing content, nor would the page be viable if the infringing content were removed.
- There is no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a free license.
To nominate an article for speedy deletion for copyright concerns, add one of these to the page:
{{db-copyvio|url=insert URL of source here}}
{{db-copyvio|describe non-web source here}}
Both of these templates will generate a notice that you should give the contributor of the content. This is important to help ensure that they do not continue to add copyrighted content to Wikipedia. An administrator will examine the article and decide whether to delete it or not. You should not blank the page in this instance.
Suspected or complicated infringement
If infringement is not blatant or the speedy deletion criteria do not apply:
- Remove or rewrite the infringing text avoiding copyright violations or revert the page to before the text was added.
- The infringing text will remain in the page history, and it may be tagged for {{copyvio-revdel}}. Administrators hold discretion on the appropriateness of revision deletion for each case. Please note the reason for removal in the edit summary and at the article's talk page (you may wish to use {{subst:cclean}}). Please identify and alert the contributor of the material to the problem, unless advised not to. The template {{Uw-copyright}} may be used for this purpose.
- However, if all revisions have copyright problems, the removal of the copyright problem is contested, reversion/removal is otherwise complicated, or the article is eligible for presumptive deletion:
- Replace the text with one of the following:
{{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}
{{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}}
- Go to and add:
{{subst:article-cv|PageName}}
from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~
- to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you.) If there is not already a page for the day, as yours would be the first listing, please add a header to the top of the page using the page for another date as an example.
- Advise the contributor of the listing at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.
Instructions for special cases
- Probable copyvios without a known source: If you suspect that a page contains a copyright violation, but you cannot find a source for the violation (so you can't be sure that it's a violation), do not list it here. Instead, place {{cv-unsure|~~~|2=FULL_URL}} on the page's talk page, but replace FULL_URL with the full URL of the page version that you believe contains a violation. (To determine the URL, click on "Permanent link" in the toolbox area, and copy the URL.)
- One contributor has verifiably introduced copyright problems into multiple pages or files and assistance is needed in further review: See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.
Instructions for handling image copyright concerns
Image copyright concerns are not handled on this board. For images that are clear copyright violations, follow the procedure for speedy deletion; otherwise list at Files for Discussion. To request assistance with contributors who have infringed copyright in multiple articles or files, see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.
Responding to articles listed for copyright investigation
Any contributor is welcome to help investigate articles listed for copyright concerns, although only administrators, copyright problems board clerks, and VRT (formerly OTRS) agents should remove {{copyvio}} tags and mark listings resolved.
Assistance might include supplying evidence of non-infringement (or, conversely, of infringement) or obtaining and verifying permission of license. You might also help by rewriting problematic articles or removing infringing text (without removing {{copyvio}}).
Supplying evidence of non-infringement
Articles listed here are suspect of copyright concern, but not every article contains infringement. The content may be on Wikipedia first, in the public domain, compatibly licensed, or falls below threshold of originality for copyright. Sometimes, the person who placed it here is the copyright owner of freely-licensed material and this simply needs to be verified.
Information can be provided to prove compatible licensing or public domain status under the listing of the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article. A link or a clear explanation can be very helpful when a clerk or administrator evaluates the matter. As listings are not immediately addressed on the board, it may take a few days after you make your note before a response is provided.
If the article is tagged for {{copyvio}}, you should allow an administrator or copyright problems clerk to remove the tag. If the article is tagged for {{copy-paste}} or {{close paraphrasing}}, you may remove the tag from the article when the problem is addressed (or disproven), but please do not close the listing on the copyright problems board itself.
Obtaining/verifying permission
Sometimes material was placed on Wikipedia with the permission of the copyright owner. Sometimes copyright owners are willing to give permission (and proper license!) even if it was not.
Any contributor can write to the owner of copyright and check whether they gave or will give permission (or maybe they in fact posted it here!). See Wikipedia:Example requests for permission. In either case, unless a statement authorizing the material under compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, permission will need to be confirmed through e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation. See Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission. If a compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, please provide a link to that under the listing for the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article.
Please note that it may take a few days for letters to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged.
Rewriting content
Any contributor may rewrite articles that are or seem to be copyight problems to exclude duplicated or closely paraphrased text. When articles or sections of articles are blanked as copyright problems, rewriting is done on a temporary page at Talk:PAGENAME/Temp so that the new material can be copied over the old. (The template blanking the article will link to the specific temporary page.)
Please do not copy over the version of the article that is a copyright problem as your base. All copied content, or material derived from it, should be removed first. Other content from the article can be used, if there is no reason to believe that it may be a copyright issue as well. It is often a good idea – and essential when the content is copied from an inaccessible source such as a book – to locate the point where the material entered the article and eliminate all text added by that contributor. This will help avoid inadvertently continuing the copyright issues in your rewrite. If you use any text at all from the earlier version of the article, please leave a note on the listing to alert the administrator or clerk who review the rewrite. The history of the old article will then have to be retained. (If the original turns out to be non-infringing, the two versions of the article can be merged.)
Rewrites can be done directly in articles that have been tagged for {{close paraphrasing}} and {{copy-paste}}, with those tags removed after the rewrite is complete.
Please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and the linked guidelines and policies within it if necessary to review Wikipedia's practices for handling non-free text. Reviewing Wikipedia:Plagiarism is also helpful, particularly where content is compatibly licensed or public domain. Repairing these issues can sometimes be as simple as supplying proper attribution.
Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia (or people editing on their behalf)
If you submitted work to Wikipedia which you had previously published and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, then stating on the article's talk page that you are the copyright holder of the work (or acting as his or her agent), while not likely to prevent deletion, helps. To completely resolve copyright concerns, it is sufficient to either:
- Link to a note permitting reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation, ideally using the email template at WP:CONSENT.
See also Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Please note that it may take a bit of time for letters and e-mails to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged. Your e-mail will receive a response whether the permission is usable or not. If you have not received a response to your letter within two weeks, it is a good idea to follow up.
One other factor you should consider, however, is that content that has been previously published elsewhere may not meet Wikipedia's specific guidelines and policies. If you are not familiar with these policies and guidelines, please review especially the core policies that govern the project. This may help prepare you to deal with any other issues with the text that may arise.
Should you choose to rewrite the content rather than release it under the requisite license, please see above.
Clerks and patrolling administrators
Copyright clerks
For a more complete description of clerks and their duties, as well as a list of active clerks, please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Clerks.
Copyright clerks are experienced editors on Wikipedia who are familiar with copyright and non-free content policies and its enforcement. They are trusted to evaluate and close listings and request administrative actions when necessary. Clerks are periodically reviewed by other clerks and patrolling administrators.
Copyright problems board administrators
For a more complete description of administrators on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Administrators.
Any administrator may work the copyright problems board. Working the copyright problems board may involve evaluating listings personally or using tools as necessary to complete closures by clerks. Clerks have been evaluated in their work, and their recommendations may be implemented without double-checking, although any administrator is welcome to review recommendations and discuss them with the clerks in question.
Closing listings
Pages can be processed at any time by anyone, but are not formally closed until a clerk or administrator verifies that all problems are resolved. Pages listed for presumptive deletion stay open for a minimum of 7 days before being processed. VRT agents may close listings at any times.
For advice for resolving listings, see:
- Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Advice for admins (VRT agents, see section there)
- Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Advice for clerks
The templates collected at Template:CPC may be useful for administrators, clerks and VRT agents noting resolution.
Listings of possible copyright problems
Older than 7 days
15 June 2023
- Copied and pasted articles and sections with url provided from April 2018
- Lamba people (Zambia) (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://lambaland.com/history
- The given source is a backwards copy but there are still copyright concerns with this article. MER-C 17:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Removed some CV, as well as unverified content Sennecaster (Chat) 20:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- PhagesDB (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/33/5/784/2731030
- Article cleaned, revision deletion requested. Sennecaster (Chat) 22:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Revision deletion completed. Copyright problem removed from history. MER-C 09:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Suspected copyright infringements without a source from February 2011
- John Henry Anderson (history · last edit · rewrite)
- August: Osage County (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Stuart Gitlow (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Meisei Goto (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MER-C 09:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Leonidas Kouris (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 19:39, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Lagonda Club (history · last edit · rewrite)
- The earwig tool is clean and sources are PD so considering it clean. Wizardman 19:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hedgemon Lewis (history · last edit · rewrite)
- No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Wizardman 19:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- List of Dastaan characters (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Redirected with no content transferred Wizardman 22:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Natta Company (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Raj Thackeray (history · last edit · rewrite)
- No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Wizardman 13:10, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Tata Young (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 13:14, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Ends. MER-C 18:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
19 July 2023
- Hardcore History (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://web.archive.org/web/20080801053729/https://www.dancarlin.com/disp.php/hharchive. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- The copyrighted material has existed at Dan Carlin for about 15 years and I only noticed it after splitting it into a separate article. See my comment on the talk page for more detail: Talk:Hardcore_History#Copyright_Violation. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MER-C 17:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Draft:Frequency principle/spectral bias (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/2201.07395/. — Diannaa (talk) 10:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- VRT ticket pending per talk page. MER-C 17:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket received, and is currently being processed. Sennecaster (Chat) 21:59, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- VRT ticket pending per talk page. MER-C 17:52, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
28 July 2023
- List of PAW Patrol episodes (history · last edit · rewrite) - was tagged as
{{cleanup|reason=Not following the guidelines of MOS:TV, and lots of possible WP:COPYVIO, as discussed in the talk page.|date=January 2021}}
* Pppery * it has begun... 01:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)- A cursory look at the wording does seem to indicate there may be copying from streaming site summaries, or other official episode descriptions. I'll be working my way through them. -- Whpq (talk) 15:11, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Just throwing in my two-cents, a quick google of a random selection of episode descriptions (20 eps) all returned nearly or completely identical descriptions on Streaming Services, TheTVDB (may have taken from Wikipedia) or the Paw Patrol Fandom wiki/website. Lyeuhm (talk) 17:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- A cursory look at the wording does seem to indicate there may be copying from streaming site summaries, or other official episode descriptions. I'll be working my way through them. -- Whpq (talk) 15:11, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Murder of Samantha Josephson (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/life-prison-man-killing-south-carolina-student-who-mistook-his-n1275215. Earwig shows other close paraphrasing and phrases copied directly from other news articles (as well as some spam pages copying it), but I'm not sure how close counts as close paraphrasing under our guidelines. Apocheir (talk) 21:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
29 July 2023
- The Dark Side Of The Moon Redux (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://nailcityrecord.com/collections/pre-orders/products/roger-waters-the-dark-side-of-the-moon-redux-2lp-vinyl. —siroχo 01:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Articles with improper non-free content from May 2017 to February 2018
- Transport Manager CPC (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Ranger APC (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 23:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Pallet Rack Safety Bolt (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Article deleted due to copyright concerns. Wizardman 22:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Gisle Kverndokk (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 02:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Sadae Mazlomeen Dharna (Parachinar) (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MER-C 16:47, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ebene, Mauritius (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 23:44, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ruth Katz (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Chinese Peasants' Association (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Geschlechterkampf (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Automatic number-plate recognition in the United Kingdom (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Butterflies with New Wings Building a Future (Butterflies) (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Partially cleaned. MER-C 17:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Mascall Formation (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Wizardman 22:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Ends. MER-C 19:01, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
3 August 2023
- Bridgeman Island (South Shetland Islands) (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://volcano.si.edu/volcano.cfm?vn=390040. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MER-C 16:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- 1000 Thalaivangi Apoorva Chinthamani (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.amazon.com/dp/9384301051/. Note: The potential violation is not of the URL's actual content, but might be of the content of the book described at the URL − Pride of Tamil Cinema 1931-2013 (Tamil Films That Have Earned National and International Recognition) – I don't know for certain that a copyvio exists in the article, but I strongly suspect it due to User:Sangavitamilmani, who added the plot summary, having a history of previous copyvios, and her having cited the book in question as the source for the "Plot section". I don't have access to the book; I would greatly appreciate if someone who does would check it out. First revision with questionable material: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1000_Thalaivangi_Apoorva_Chinthamani&oldid=713470248 Last revision before flagging: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1000_Thalaivangi_Apoorva_Chinthamani&oldid=1103927630 SmileySnail (talk) 22:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Google Books isn't helpful in my region. MER-C 16:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I tried Google Books too. I also tried Archive.org Open Library, with no success. Amazon sells it as an E-book, but it costs $15. I haven't got $15 to spend on a book that I'm not truly interested in reading for myself, and I'm sure you and a lot of other people are in the same situation. Hopefully, someone who already owns the book will see this listing, or someone who knows someone who owns it, or else some benevolent wealthy person who has no issues with buying a $15 book solely for the purpose of solving this problem. Honestly, I'm just happy to get any response to my listing at all, be it positive or negative. So, thank you for your response, and for all the good work you do here on Wikipedia. SmileySnail (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps WP:RX can help? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:48, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- WP:RX looks promising; I will try it, although I think I will wait until I have gone through the entire list on the CCI subpage for Sangavitamilmani, just in case she cited the book in other articles, so I can request all relevant pages in a single request. Thank you, Jo-Jo Eumerus, for your response and for everything you do on Wikipedia. SmileySnail (talk) 18:25, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps WP:RX can help? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:48, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I tried Google Books too. I also tried Archive.org Open Library, with no success. Amazon sells it as an E-book, but it costs $15. I haven't got $15 to spend on a book that I'm not truly interested in reading for myself, and I'm sure you and a lot of other people are in the same situation. Hopefully, someone who already owns the book will see this listing, or someone who knows someone who owns it, or else some benevolent wealthy person who has no issues with buying a $15 book solely for the purpose of solving this problem. Honestly, I'm just happy to get any response to my listing at all, be it positive or negative. So, thank you for your response, and for all the good work you do here on Wikipedia. SmileySnail (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Google Books isn't helpful in my region. MER-C 16:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
New listings
New listings are not added directly to this page but are instead on daily reports. To add a new listing, please go to . Instructions for adding new listings can be found at Instructions for listing text-based copyright concerns. Editors may resolve issues within listings by removing the copyrighted content or rewriting content on the temporary pages at any time, save for presumptive deletion. See the section on responding for more information.
6 August 2023
- Suspected copyright infringements without a source from March 2011
- 2nd Battalion 32nd Field Artillery Regiment (United States) (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Merged to 32nd Field Artillery Regiment. MER-C 17:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Massive dump with no sources, probably a copyvio but I can't find a source. Will remove as unsourced. Sennecaster (Chat) 00:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- BMW Marine (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Botanical Research Institute of Texas (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Congregation B'nai Jacob (Woodbridge, Connecticut) (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Gordon E. Hines (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Charles Andrew Howell III (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Michael Hudson (economist) (history · last edit · rewrite)
- José Limón (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Louis W. Menk (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Steve Daines (history · last edit · rewrite) (archive 1)
- Tanycyte (history · last edit · rewrite)
- Marcos Valle (history · last edit · rewrite)
Ends. MER-C 17:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Regular suspected copyright infringements
- Hayflick limit (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236227809_Three_layer_functional_model_and_energy_exchange_concept_of_aging_process - you need to view the pdf to see the copy/pasted sentence. The user inserted the sentence in this edit on 21 Sep 2021 with an edit description that doesn't match the actual edit. Could be an innocent mistake but in that case the user didn't double-check the edit. Boud (talk) 20:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
7 August 2023
- Draft:Timeline of violent events relating to the Lebanese Civil War (1975–1977) (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Report-Lebanon-Mapping-2013-EN_0.pdf. — Diannaa (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
8 August 2023
- History of Dedham, Massachusetts, 2000–present (history · last edit · rewrite) has incomplete attribution because it contains text copied from the deleted article History of Dedham, Massachusetts, in television and film. See WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1135#Merging deleted content for more context. Note that one revision is currently at User:Slugger O'Toole/History of Dedham, Massachusetts, in television and film.
- One approach is to undelete and redirect, but that would alter the delete outcome of WP:Articles for deletion/History of Dedham, Massachusetts, in television and film.
- WP:Merge and delete (essay) lists other options. Flatscan (talk) 04:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
9 August 2023
- David D. Stern (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.davidsternstudio.com/cv. I couldn't find a clean version to revert to. — Diannaa (talk) 02:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Sean McFate (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.midcoastforum.org/2021/?cat=18. — Diannaa (talk) 14:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
11 August 2023
- Alliance of Girls' Schools Australasia (history · last edit · rewrite) from agsa.org.au/page/About/Our_History. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 19:04, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
13 August 2023
- Trindade and Martim Vaz (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://web.archive.org/web/20041225055500/http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1805-051. Text came from Trindade (island) and was revdeleted from there per Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20230812. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:15, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia's current date is 13 August 2023. Put new article listings in Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2023 August 13. Files should be handled by speedy deletion or Wikipedia:Files for discussion.