Bir makalenin en iyi düzenlemeleri
Bir sayfaya bir kullanıcı tarafından yapılan tüm düzenlemeler kronolojik sıraya göre yapılır.
Madde | Detransition (Günlük · Sayfa Geçmişi) |
Kullanıcı | Crossroads (Değişiklik Sayacı· En İyi Düzenlemeler) |
Toplam düzenlemeleri | 52 |
Küçük değişiklikler | 2 (%3,8) |
(Yarı)-Otomatik düzenlemeler | 4 (%7,7) |
Geri alınan düzenlemeler | 8 (%15,4) |
atbe1 | 23,3 |
Eklendi (bayt)2 | 9.186 |
Silindi (bayt) | -5.190 |
Küçük değişiklikler
·
2 (%3,8)
Önemli düzenlemeler
·
50 (%96,2)
(Yarı)-Otomatik düzenlemeler
·
4 (%7,7)
Manuel düzenlemeler
·
48 (%92,3)
Geri alınan düzenlemeler
·
8 (%15,4)
Geri alınmayan düzenlemeler
·
44 (%84,6)
1 Düzenlemeler arasındaki ortalama zaman (gün)
2 Eklenen metin, geri döndürülmeyen olumlu bir eklemedir (yaklaşık)
Tarih | Bağlantılar | Boyut | Değişiklik özeti |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-26 19:13 | Fark · Geçmiş | -297 | Doesn't seem to be an WP:RS, also not necessary (social environment is already covered) |
2023-02-18 02:21 | Fark · Geçmiş | -21 | Per recent talk page comment |
2023-01-19 20:31 | Fark · Geçmiş | -392 | (geri alındı) This survey only studied people who currently identified as trans in some form - see below |
2022-12-10 21:28 | Fark · Geçmiş | -13 | Not normally a word used in this context; seems to be covered by "social" |
2022-09-30 23:23 | Fark · Geçmiş | -14 | Undid revision 1113299180 by Mercer17 (talk) Is this based on a source? |
2022-09-14 00:21 | Fark · Geçmiş | 17 | →Cultural and political impact: WP:SAID, align description with the org's Wikipedia article, clarify that not all detransition communities are transphobic |
2022-08-18 19:40 | Fark · Geçmiş | -38 | Not where "see also" goes (and anything in a subsection should be here also as this is the main article on it) |
2022-05-07 01:46 | Fark · Geçmiş | 7 | →Occurrence: Not going beyond the source: "who, by current DSM-5 standards, would not likely have been categorized as transgender" |
2022-05-05 01:59 | Fark · Geçmiş | -18 | →Cultural and political impact: copyedit, de-redlink name that was found non-notable at AfD |
2022-05-02 23:18 | Fark · Geçmiş | 368 | (geri alındı) The existing sources are also primary or, worse, are from the news media rather than academic journals. |
2022-04-28 02:20 | Fark · Geçmiş | -289 | Absorb new tiny section into "society and culture" which it clearly falls under. Consolidate duplicate refs. |
2022-04-21 03:18 | Fark · Geçmiş | 109 | Rationale on Talk is outdated, as this is cited to a study. Changed it to "some". |
2022-04-10 03:43 | Fark · Geçmiş | -1.000 | Not a consensus for this on the talk page. It cites a blog, with no evidence of WP:DUE being met, and makes psychological claims that need a WP:MEDRS. |
2022-03-27 05:39 | Fark · Geçmiş | -1.000 | (geri alındı) Too many issues with this, as explained on Talk, including MEDRS-related. Per WP:ONUS it should not be restored without consensus. |
2022-03-27 01:51 | Fark · Geçmiş | -1.000 | (geri alındı) Wordpress blog is not WP:RS or WP:DUE. |
2022-01-23 06:04 | Fark · Geçmiş | -352 | →Individual accounts: The existing sources are from 2019, but this quote speaks about something from 2021? Seems sketchy. |
2022-01-04 01:42 | Fark · Geçmiş | -65 | Unclear in meaning and possibly unsupported |
2021-11-15 23:17 | Fark · Geçmiş | -250 | Unnecessary blog post. This material is cited to the citations coming at the end of the following sentence. Also, the blog post repeats the common misconception about the USTS that it is representative of the population - it only surveyed people who were trans. |
2021-09-18 04:46 | Fark · Geçmiş | 767 | Include both here. Update does not justify removing past events. |
2021-09-05 22:21 | Fark · Geçmiş | -344 | Remove specific rates from lead for now - best not to pick a couple studies to emphasize, and that survey of 27,000 shouldn't be mentioned without it being clear that only transgender people were surveyed. |
2021-08-27 23:13 | Fark · Geçmiş | -341 | →Cultural and political impact: Rm source and name-drop that does not mention detransition per WP:SYNTH |
2021-08-27 23:06 | Fark · Geçmiş | -200 | Don't think this summary is lead-worthy |
2021-08-26 03:22 | Fark · Geçmiş | -39 | →Further reading: only two navboxes, surrounding template not needed |
2021-08-26 03:15 | Fark · Geçmiş | -35 | Lead is *not* too short, please don't rock the boat on this one, not feeling like hours and hours of talk page wrangling to hash out a longer lead |
2021-08-25 05:04 | Fark · Geçmiş | -56 | →Occurrence: Smooth wording |
2021-08-25 03:34 | Fark · Geçmiş | -410 | Rm non sequitur - can't see what lack of criteria prior to 1980 has to do with 2000. |
2021-07-08 02:04 | Fark · Geçmiş | -4 | →Individual accounts: circular redirect |
2021-06-11 03:00 | Fark · Geçmiş | 11 | Copyedits; remove odd quotation marks |
2021-06-05 23:49 | Fark · Geçmiş | 477 | →Occurrence: 'Majority retransition' applies only to the 2015 survey of trans people; have split the reference into its own footnote, cited the original report as well, and clarified the text. |
2021-06-05 23:28 | Fark · Geçmiş | -1 | →Occurrence: Move up sentence, combine with paragraph |
2021-06-05 23:25 | Fark · Geçmiş | 147 | →Occurrence: Ref quote |
2021-06-05 23:23 | Fark · Geçmiş | 204 | →Occurrence: Add cite for CN tag |
2021-06-04 05:00 | Fark · Geçmiş | 1 | Meant to add: The 12 *are* the 9.4 percent in that study. The 'majority retransition' point appears to be from the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey, which only accepted responses from transgender people - see User:Genericusername57's 27 May edit summary. Other removals are not justified. Claimed redundancy does not appear to be mentioned elsewhere. CN tag not needed for reliably sourced study. Please discuss on Talk if you wish to pursue these further. |
2021-06-04 04:52 | Fark · Geçmiş | 2.355 | I carefully examined each edit. The IP's edits are personal opinion, but I did preserve the pronoun changes |
2021-06-03 05:10 | Fark · Geçmiş | -33 | Lead's fine. Who wants to spend hours wrangling over how to word it anyway. If there is something specific you feel is missing then point it out. |
2021-06-02 05:44 | Fark · Geçmiş | -34 | Revert vague and unhelpful WP:Drive-by tagging. |
2021-05-23 21:18 | Fark · Geçmiş | -43 | Split thought to hold more closely to sources per my comment at Talk:Detransition#Harassment sentence. |
2021-05-22 23:09 | Fark · Geçmiş | 110 | (geri alındı) Revert POV cover-up; it's in the sources, see the quotes |
2021-05-22 21:35 | Fark · Geçmiş | -176 | Overtagging - see WP:LEADCITE (citations not mandatory in lead so long as body is accurately summarized). As for "by whom", we're obviously not going to list person after person mid-sentence; that's terrible writing. Fixed POV doubt-casting language about detransitioner accounts from study. |
2021-05-21 03:47 | Fark · Geçmiş | 6 | →Cultural and political impact: clarify/fix |
2021-05-21 03:46 | Fark · Geçmiş | 41 | "Atmosphere of" is closer to the refs; also clarified what WPATH is |
2021-05-09 05:01 | Fark · Geçmiş | -595 | (geri alındı) Rv special pleading; see talk page. Review article outranks primary sources every time. See WP:MEDRS. |
2021-05-04 05:27 | Fark · Geçmiş | 916 | (geri alındı) We already have other primary sources; no NPOV reason to exclude this one. |
2021-04-04 03:06 | Fark · Geçmiş | 553 | Verified, add quote |
2021-03-28 22:13 | Fark · Geçmiş | -525 | This is a medical topic and is thus covered by *WP:MEDRS* which you should see. KQED is *not* a peer-reviewed medical source, NPR or not. |
2021-03-27 21:35 | Fark · Geçmiş | -542 | (geri alındı) KQED is not WP:MEDRS nor even scholarship; see WP:SOURCETYPES. |
2020-08-26 03:13 | Fark · Geçmiş | -27 | →Cultural and political impact: clear enough |
2020-08-25 15:53 | Fark · Geçmiş | 3.809 | Reverted to revision 974787366 by Aircorn: Revert. There is as yet no consensus for these removals or for purging Herzog, Singal, etc. from the article. See the portions of WP:MEDRS which Wikipedia:Biomedical information talks about - society and culture content, such as talking about attacks on social media, does not need review article sourcing. You already tried purging Singal before. Discuss on the talk page. (TW) |
2020-07-15 19:45 | Fark · Geçmiş | 680 | You're cutting The Atlantic now? See WP:RSP, it's in green. Also see WP:BIASEDSOURCES: "reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject." |
2020-03-26 02:37 | Fark · Geçmiş | -74 | Reverted to revision 946884383 by Equivamp (talk): Not needed (TW) |
2020-03-22 06:17 | Fark · Geçmiş | 2 | →Transitioning after detransitioning: making subsection |
2019-11-29 22:28 | Fark · Geçmiş | -491 | Undid revision 928529519 by Thesciencenewsonline (talk) Likely COI, see contribs |
Tüm zamanlar UTC'ye göredir.