Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
ⴰⵎⴳⵔⴰⴷ | Talk:Genetically modified food (Log · Amazray n usebter) |
User | Petrarchan47 (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 200 |
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵎⵥⵢⴰⵏⴻⵏ | 61 (30,5 %) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 1 (0,5 %) |
Reverted edits | 1 (0,5 %) |
atbe1 | 1,4 |
Yettawrna(iṭamḍanen)2 | 148 244 |
ⵉⵜⵜⵓⴽⴽⵙ (ⵉⴱⴰⵢⵜⵏ) | -4 577 |
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵎⵥⵢⴰⵏⴻⵏ
·
61 (30,5 %)
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵎⵇⵔⴰⵏⴻⵏ
·
139 (69,5 %)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (0,5 %)
ⵉⵙⵏⵉⴼⵉⵍⵏ ⵉⵡⴼⵓⵙⵏ
·
199 (99,5 %)
Reverted edits
·
1 (0,5 %)
Unreverted edits
·
199 (99,5 %)
1 Tanzagt talemmast ger sin ibeddilen
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
ⴰⵙⴰⴽⵓⴷ | ⵉⵙⵖⵏⴰⵏ | Tiddi | Ẓreg agzul |
---|---|---|---|
2016-02-25 06:21 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 0 | →Removal of images: |
2016-02-25 06:20 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 526 | →Removal of images: not up for debate |
2016-02-04 06:06 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 95 | →A new take on the safety summary: |
2016-02-04 06:03 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 88 | →A new take on the safety summary: |
2016-02-04 06:02 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 217 | →A new take on the safety summary: King you do not have PAGs on your side; stop bullying |
2015-11-22 02:52 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 | →FDA's new definition of GMO: |
2015-11-22 02:51 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 12 | →FDA's new definition of GMO: |
2015-11-22 02:50 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 424 | →FDA's new definition of GMO: +NEJM |
2015-11-22 01:39 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 0 | →GMO salmon: |
2015-11-22 01:38 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 457 | →GMO salmon: +ref |
2015-11-21 18:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 701 | →FDA's new definition of GMO: new section |
2015-11-17 00:50 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 411 | →Controversy: American Academy of Environmental Medicine: ? |
2015-10-02 02:39 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 6 | →Recap: |
2015-10-02 02:38 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 6 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: |
2015-10-02 01:51 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 137 | →Additional high-quality sources for GMO articles that provide a balanced view: Added 2 bits |
2015-10-02 01:28 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 844 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: "Illusory Consensus Behind GMO Health Assessment" from Tufts full review now available; re |
2015-09-10 16:50 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 372 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: help needed with adding MEDRS to existing phrase re health effects |
2015-09-10 16:18 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -1 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: |
2015-09-10 16:17 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 48 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: |
2015-09-10 16:15 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 760 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: Request for link to aforementioned discussion; request for input |
2015-09-09 23:48 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -182 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: swapped quotations |
2015-09-09 23:41 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 8 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: |
2015-09-09 22:44 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 81 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: added link to Krimsky |
2015-09-08 22:07 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 84 | →An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment: amend to correct context |
2015-09-06 20:16 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 59 | →Recap: clearly mark where convo stalled |
2015-08-30 20:59 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 317 | →RFC regarding WHO study: PW:POVFORKing? |
2015-08-30 20:52 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 3 794 | →Readding of OR references: it is high time. |
2015-08-29 04:15 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 452 | →Recap: Question for Jytdog about claim, request for link to discussion |
2015-08-29 04:10 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 205 | →Readding of OR references: cmt |
2015-08-28 21:47 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 987 | →RFC regarding WHO study: WP:LINKSTYLE |
2015-08-27 20:37 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 0 | →Recap: |
2015-08-27 20:36 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 530 | →Recap: cmt |
2015-08-27 20:28 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 0 | →Recap: |
2015-08-27 20:16 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 615 | →Recap: r |
2015-08-27 04:38 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -4 | →Recap: |
2015-08-27 04:28 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 3 340 | →proposal for consensus statement: cmt |
2015-08-27 03:37 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 545 | →RFC regarding WHO study: Support |
2015-08-18 01:58 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 22 | →Taleb, redux: |
2015-08-18 01:54 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 624 | →Taleb, redux: cmt |
2015-08-18 01:49 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 812 | →Taleb, redux: r |
2015-08-13 23:54 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 0 | →Recap: |
2015-08-13 23:54 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 60 | →Recap: |
2015-08-13 23:52 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 699 | →Recap: re |
2015-08-06 14:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 875 | →Arbitrary break: another (mini) RfC? |
2015-08-01 05:07 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 365 | →proposal for consensus statement: |
2015-08-01 05:04 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 799 | →proposal for consensus statement: troublesome change to WP:RS/AC |
2015-07-31 03:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 | →proposal for consensus statement: |
2015-07-31 03:56 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 353 | →proposal for consensus statement: MEDRS required |
2015-07-29 17:05 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 875 | →Arbitrary break: oops, violation WP:RS |
2015-07-29 06:29 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 110 | →Arbitrary break: cmt |
2015-07-28 15:17 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 602 | →GrayDuck156's Proposed Revised Language: stop off-topic meandering please |
2015-07-28 03:58 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 591 | →GrayDuck156's Proposed Revised Language: WP:OWNBEHAVIOR |
2015-07-28 00:11 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 | →GrayDuck156's Proposed Revised Language: |
2015-07-28 00:08 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -3 960 | →GrayDuck156's Proposed Revised Language: Removed offending bits/source (?) |
2015-07-28 00:06 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 127 | →RfC on Sentence on “broad scientific consensus” of GMO food safety fails to achieve consensus: It is time to improve it.: ? |
2015-07-27 22:14 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 257 | →RfC on Sentence on “broad scientific consensus” of GMO food safety fails to achieve consensus: It is time to improve it.: r |
2015-07-27 22:07 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 80 | Undid revision 673354344 by Jytdog (talk)There is no reason to :shorten the header" - please don't change another editor's input for no good reason |
2015-07-27 19:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 7 438 | →RfC on Sentence on “broad scientific consensus” of GMO food safety fails to achieve consensus: It is time to improve it.: added references |
2015-07-24 03:31 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 201 | →RfC on Sentence on “broad scientific consensus” of GMO food safety fails to achieve consensus: It is time to improve it.: r, cmt |
2015-07-23 09:07 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 681 | →RfC on Sentence on “broad scientific consensus” of GMO food safety fails to achieve consensus: It is time to improve it.: cmt |
2015-07-22 08:25 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 0 | →RfC on Sentence on “broad scientific consensus” of GMO food safety fails to achieve consensus: It is time to improve it.: |
2015-07-22 08:25 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 319 | →RfC on Sentence on “broad scientific consensus” of GMO food safety fails to achieve consensus: It is time to improve it.: |
2015-07-14 07:43 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -49 | getting rid of my bolding |
2015-07-11 17:11 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -125 | →RfC: Should the "Safety Consensus" discussion be moved out of the Controversy section?: moved safety para |
2015-07-10 21:03 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 257 | →Survey: Move or Remain: cmt |
2015-07-09 21:36 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 626 | →RfC: Should the "Safety Consensus" discussion be moved out of the Controversy section?: cmt |
2015-07-07 00:18 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 195 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": cmt |
2015-07-06 05:18 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 010 | →Uninvolved editors: cmt |
2015-07-03 21:49 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 580 | →Uninvolved editors: discuss content, not editors |
2015-07-02 22:45 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 113 | (reverted) →Uninvolved editors: Hatting misinformation related to RfC |
2015-07-02 06:25 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 947 | →Uninvolved editors: r, r |
2015-07-02 03:52 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 700 | →Uninvolved editors: cmt |
2015-07-01 19:02 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 53 | →Survey: |
2015-07-01 18:56 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 504 | →Survey: cmt |
2015-06-29 09:46 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 9 | →Survey: |
2015-06-29 09:43 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 376 | →Survey: |
2015-06-29 09:35 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 316 | note to Martin |
2015-06-29 05:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 18 | →Survey: + date |
2015-06-29 05:51 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 288 | →Survey: + sig |
2015-06-29 05:48 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -3 | →Survey: |
2015-06-29 05:44 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 12 292 | →Survey: rmvd 'question and comment' as addressed; updated Oppose/comments per discussion |
2015-06-26 19:21 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 4 | →Not just safety is controversial: |
2015-06-26 19:20 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 842 | →Not just safety is controversial: r |
2015-06-26 01:50 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 28 | →Discussion: |
2015-06-26 01:49 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 431 | →Discussion: r, ping knowledgeable one |
2015-06-26 01:42 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 327 | →Not just safety is controversial: TFD is right |
2015-06-25 07:30 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 662 | →Discussion: GreyDuck speaks truth. |
2015-06-25 05:22 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 927 | →Not just safety is controversial: r |
2015-06-25 05:15 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 12 | →If Safety is "the biggest GMO controversy", why don't we tell the reader?: |
2015-06-25 05:14 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 | →If Safety is "the biggest GMO controversy", why don't we tell the reader?: |
2015-06-25 05:12 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 288 | →Not just safety is controversial: + |
2015-06-23 03:44 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 35 | →Survey: Move or Remain: |
2015-06-22 02:55 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 972 | →Discussion: r |
2015-06-21 16:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 360 | →Survey: Move or Remain: r |
2015-06-21 16:51 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 301 | →Survey: Move or Remain: r |
2015-06-21 16:50 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 583 | →Discussion: resource for PAG clarification? |
2015-06-21 05:45 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 7 | →Survey: Move or Remain: |
2015-06-21 05:44 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 759 | →Survey: Move or Remain: r |
2015-06-21 05:36 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 830 | →Survey: Move or Remain: r |
2015-06-20 21:24 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 48 | →Survey: |
2015-06-20 21:21 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 255 | →Survey: Move or Remain: quoting T to T |
2015-06-20 01:59 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 866 | →Discussion: cmt |
2015-06-19 00:07 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 16 | →Survey: Specify options |
2015-06-19 00:06 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -27 | →Survey: |
2015-06-19 00:05 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 192 | →RfC: Should the "Safety Consensus" discussion be moved out of the Controversy section?: added survey, comment and notices |
2015-06-18 23:48 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 235 | →RfC: Should the "Safety Consensus" discussion be moved out of the Controversy section?: background |
2015-06-18 23:47 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 604 | →RfC: Should the "Safety Consensus" discussion be moved out of the Controversy section?: new section |
2015-06-16 00:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 | →Related articles: separating thoughts (hope that's OK, David) |
2015-06-16 00:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 509 | →Related articles: r T |
2015-06-15 00:38 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 324 | →Related articles: r |
2015-06-15 00:25 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 338 | →Removal of sources older than 5 years: cmt |
2015-06-14 18:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 19 | →Related articles: |
2015-06-14 18:51 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 285 | →Related articles: r |
2015-06-14 05:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 8 | →Related articles: |
2015-06-14 05:46 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 | →Related articles: |
2015-06-14 05:46 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 944 | →Related articles: r |
2015-06-14 00:01 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 861 | →Related articles: r |
2015-06-13 23:56 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 385 | →Article: r |
2015-06-13 23:52 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 492 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": r |
2015-06-12 17:18 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 924 | →Article: if I hear SYNC one more time ;) |
2015-06-12 03:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 | →Article: |
2015-06-12 03:54 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 859 | →Article: r |
2015-06-10 22:55 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 519 | →Objections?: r |
2015-06-10 22:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 776 | →How on earth did these sections even get in here? Some reorganization is needed.: r |
2015-06-10 20:22 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 553 | →How on earth did these sections even get in here? Some reorganization is needed.: r |
2015-06-10 19:09 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 534 | →Comparison of pre-rearrangement article with current version: r |
2015-06-10 01:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 622 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": r Zad |
2015-06-10 01:49 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 509 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": r, r |
2015-06-10 01:27 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 359 | →Objections?: old article more comprehensive: another look |
2015-06-09 04:14 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 129 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": |
2015-06-09 04:09 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 113 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": |
2015-06-09 03:09 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 119 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": |
2015-06-08 20:07 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 74 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": |
2015-06-08 20:06 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 627 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": Support per Tsavage |
2015-06-08 05:54 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -5 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": |
2015-06-08 05:52 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 844 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": r |
2015-06-08 05:25 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -58 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": |
2015-06-08 05:16 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -14 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": |
2015-06-08 03:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 3 358 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": r Zad |
2015-06-07 03:31 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 412 | →Objections?: linked edit in question |
2015-06-07 03:12 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 38 | →Objections?: |
2015-06-07 03:09 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 284 | →Objections?: |
2015-06-07 03:04 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 120 | →Objections?: r |
2015-06-06 22:20 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 576 | →Objections?: r |
2015-06-06 20:37 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 514 | →Objections?: Agree to move Safety Consensus statement from Controversies & into its own section? |
2015-06-06 04:55 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 706 | →Objections?: Why is the Safety Consensus statement in the Controversies section? |
2015-06-06 03:50 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 5 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": |
2015-06-06 03:49 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 215 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": r |
2015-06-05 20:59 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 563 | →WHO source: course of action? |
2015-06-05 20:55 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -1 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": |
2015-06-05 20:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 787 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": cmt |
2015-06-05 20:37 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -135 | →Objections?: |
2015-06-05 20:36 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 80 | →Objections?: |
2015-06-05 20:31 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 854 | →Public Perception: comprehension issues |
2015-06-05 19:04 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 497 | →Public Perception: Policy based objections requested |
2015-06-05 05:56 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 0 | →Public Perception: |
2015-06-05 05:56 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 18 | →Public Perception: added relevant PAGs |
2015-06-05 02:00 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 477 | →How on earth did these sections even get in here? Some reorganization is needed.: thx |
2015-06-05 01:35 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 754 | →Public Perception: r |
2015-06-04 23:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 9 | →Public Perception: |
2015-06-04 23:50 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 171 | →Public Perception: + Vegas |
2015-06-04 23:46 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 | →Public Perception: |
2015-06-04 23:44 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 26 | →Public Perception: |
2015-06-04 23:43 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 3 | →Public Perception: |
2015-06-04 23:42 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 3 501 | →Public Perception: not exempt from PAGs |
2015-06-04 08:50 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 200 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": amended |
2015-06-04 03:28 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 389 | →Discussion: interrupted flow fix |
2015-06-04 03:14 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 168 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": still ignoring WHO? |
2015-06-04 02:21 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 920 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": r |
2015-06-04 00:09 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 868 | →Discussion: cmt on WP:OR def as displayed in "consensus" statement |
2015-06-03 23:05 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 014 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": further clarity requested |
2015-06-03 21:12 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 469 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": Jytdog - ref request |
2015-06-03 09:48 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 663 | →Removal of sources older than 5 years: inaccurate assessment |
2015-06-03 07:09 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 316 | →2015 review: no safety consensus, risks acknowledged: |
2015-06-03 00:30 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 344 | →2011 peer-reviewed studies: No Consensus: WP:OWN |
2015-06-03 00:18 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 292 | →2011 peer-reviewed studies: No Consensus: sig |
2015-06-03 00:17 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | -13 | →2015 peer reviewed study: no safety consensus, risks acknowledged: |
2015-06-03 00:15 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 719 | →2011 peer-reviewed studies: No Consensus: misunderstanding |
2015-06-02 23:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 139 | →2011 peer-reviewed studies: No Consensus: 2015 review |
2015-06-02 23:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 550 | →2011 peer-reviewed studies: No Consensus: Who ignores WHO? |
2015-06-02 23:47 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 864 | →Removal of sources older than 5 years: r Wnt |
2015-06-02 06:49 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 841 | →2011 peer-reviewed studies: No Consensus: r |
2015-06-02 05:01 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 487 | →Discussion: added skeptic view |
2015-06-02 04:37 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 645 | →WHO source: r |
2015-06-02 03:45 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 353 | →2011 peer-reviewed studies: No Consensus: more info - problem? |
2015-06-02 02:05 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 271 | →2011 peer-reviewed study: No Consensus: + another 2011 review |
2015-06-01 21:56 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 764 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": cannot change the RfC after it is well on its way just to gain a new support vote |
2015-06-01 21:39 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 540 | →2011 peer-reviewed study: No Consensus: r Guy |
2015-06-01 05:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 396 | →2011 peer-reviewed study: No Consensus: |
2015-06-01 05:53 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 595 | →RfC - "The scientific consensus holds that currently marketed GM food poses no greater risk than conventional food.": added to my iVote |
2015-06-01 05:38 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 016 | →quotes from all sources: 2011 review of literature: no consensus |
2015-05-31 18:51 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 123 | →Survey: ignoring sources, promoting SYNTH |
2015-05-31 09:09 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 873 | →Discussion: r Jdog |
2015-05-31 03:33 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 3 069 | →Discussion: 2015 review from Environmental Sciences Europe concludes no consensus exists |
2015-05-30 08:44 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 423 | →Survey: remove repetition; re |
2015-05-30 05:33 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 005 | →Survey: No |
2015-05-30 04:57 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 563 | →WHO source: r |
2015-05-30 04:33 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 1 150 | →Survey: cmt |
2015-05-29 08:59 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 490 | →WHO source: link please |
2015-05-28 23:20 | Amgired · ⴰⵎⵣⵔⵓⵢ | 2 255 | →WHO source: comment on SYNTH/OR? Advocacy |
All times are in UTC.