Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Amagrad | Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States/Defining the United States of America (Log · Amazray n usebter) |
User | Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 20 |
Minor edits | 1 (5%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 0,6 |
Yettawrna(iṭamḍanen)2 | 16 985 |
Deleted (bytes) | -18 |
Minor edits
·
1 (5%)
Major edits
·
19 (95%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
20 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
20 (100%)
1 Tanzagt talemmast ger sin ibeddilen
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Azemz | Links | Tiddi | Ẓreg agzul |
---|---|---|---|
2013-03-02 10:04 | Amgired · History | 599 | →Implications: striking my block of text; TVH largely rewrote the statement I replied to |
2013-03-02 09:15 | Amgired · History | 744 | →Implications: response |
2013-03-01 20:23 | Amgired · History | 783 | →Implications: response to not bringing up the argument on pages that would be affected |
2013-02-27 12:26 | Amgired · History | 491 | →American Jurisprudence definition: tweak to add quote about philippines |
2013-02-27 12:22 | Amgired · History | 307 | →American Jurisprudence definition: you've gotta be kidding me |
2013-02-26 21:36 | Amgired · History | 736 | →American Jurisprudence definition: looks like pretty much everything |
2013-02-26 16:21 | Amgired · History | 898 | →American Jurisprudence definition: how is this relevant? |
2013-02-26 13:12 | Amgired · History | 291 | →American Jurisprudence definition: how are the sources incompetent |
2013-02-26 04:07 | Amgired · History | 973 | →American Jurisprudence definition: check out the encyclopedia articles themselves |
2013-02-25 18:33 | Amgired · History | 1 430 | →American Jurisprudence definition: hasn't been overruled on that point, not that it matters; notes on wikipedia policy |
2013-02-25 14:30 | Amgired · History | 1 148 | →American Jurisprudence definition: providing citations; admittedly neither article is perfect, but i feel it provides sufficient context to resolve the ambiguity that they establish |
2013-02-21 15:38 | Amgired · History | 472 | →Arbitrary break: get to the point |
2013-02-20 07:56 | Amgired · History | 798 | →Comparative country-article usage at WP: arbitrary break; clarifying PSTS, sources for law |
2013-02-19 13:54 | Amgired · History | 785 | response |
2013-02-19 13:50 | Amgired · History | -18 | rm inflammatory subsectioning |
2013-02-19 07:52 | Amgired · History | 48 | →Comparative country-article usage at WP: fixing an error and elaborating on what i mean |
2013-02-19 01:00 | Amgired · History | 892 | →Discussion: that's basically what i tried to bring about at first |
2013-02-18 01:33 | Amgired · History | 448 | →The issue: adding quote from Am Jur that may explain things better |
2013-02-18 01:27 | Amgired · History | 896 | →Oppose: clarification of my intent |
2013-02-17 22:40 | Amgired · History | 4 246 | draft proposal for how we should define "United States" in articles, as recommended at WT:USA |
All times are in UTC.